%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : CAT003-4 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2iqVNMxnth true
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:29:56 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.93s 0.75s
% Output : Refutation 0.93s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : CAT003-4 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2iqVNMxnth true
% 0.08/0.33 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 10:50:23 EDT 2025
% 0.08/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.33 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.08/0.33 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.33 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.08/0.33 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.08/0.33 % Running in FO mode
% 0.12/0.56 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.12/0.56 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.12/0.56 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.74/0.65 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.74/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.74/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.93/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.93/0.75 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.93/0.75 % BCE start: 16
% 0.93/0.75 % BCE eliminated: 1
% 0.93/0.75 % PE start: 15
% 0.93/0.75 logic: eq
% 0.93/0.75 % PE eliminated: 2
% 0.93/0.75 % done 46 iterations in 0.026s
% 0.93/0.75 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.93/0.75 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.93/0.75 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.93/0.75 thf(compose_type, type, compose: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.93/0.75 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.93/0.75 thf(h_type, type, h: $i).
% 0.93/0.75 thf(g_type, type, g: $i).
% 0.93/0.75 thf(ha_equals_ga, axiom, (( compose @ h @ a ) = ( compose @ g @ a ))).
% 0.93/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain, (((compose @ h @ a) = (compose @ g @ a))),
% 0.93/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ha_equals_ga])).
% 0.93/0.75 thf(associativity_of_compose, axiom,
% 0.93/0.75 (( compose @ X @ ( compose @ Y @ Z ) ) =
% 0.93/0.75 ( compose @ ( compose @ X @ Y ) @ Z ))).
% 0.93/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.93/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.93/0.75 ((compose @ X0 @ (compose @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.93/0.75 = (compose @ (compose @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 0.93/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_compose])).
% 0.93/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl82, plain,
% 0.93/0.75 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.93/0.75 ((compose @ g @ (compose @ a @ X0))
% 0.93/0.75 = (compose @ (compose @ h @ a) @ X0))),
% 0.93/0.75 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl14, zip_derived_cl8])).
% 0.93/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.93/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.93/0.75 ((compose @ X0 @ (compose @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.93/0.75 = (compose @ (compose @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 0.93/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_compose])).
% 0.93/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl84, plain,
% 0.93/0.75 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.93/0.75 ((compose @ g @ (compose @ a @ X0))
% 0.93/0.75 = (compose @ h @ (compose @ a @ X0)))),
% 0.93/0.75 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl82, zip_derived_cl8])).
% 0.93/0.75 thf(epimorphism, axiom,
% 0.93/0.75 (( ( compose @ X @ ( compose @ a @ b ) ) != ( Y ) ) |
% 0.93/0.75 ( ( compose @ Z @ ( compose @ a @ b ) ) != ( Y ) ) | ( ( X ) = ( Z ) ))).
% 0.93/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 0.93/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.93/0.75 (((compose @ X1 @ (compose @ a @ b)) != (X0))
% 0.93/0.75 | ((compose @ X2 @ (compose @ a @ b)) != (X0))
% 0.93/0.75 | ((X1) = (X2)))),
% 0.93/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [epimorphism])).
% 0.93/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl92, plain,
% 0.93/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.93/0.75 (((X0) = (X1))
% 0.93/0.75 | ((compose @ X1 @ (compose @ a @ b))
% 0.93/0.75 != (compose @ X0 @ (compose @ a @ b))))),
% 0.93/0.75 inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl12])).
% 0.93/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl168, plain,
% 0.93/0.75 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.93/0.75 (((X0) = (g))
% 0.93/0.75 | ((compose @ h @ (compose @ a @ b))
% 0.93/0.75 != (compose @ X0 @ (compose @ a @ b))))),
% 0.93/0.75 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl84, zip_derived_cl92])).
% 0.93/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl189, plain, (((h) = (g))),
% 0.93/0.75 inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl168])).
% 0.93/0.75 thf(prove_g_equals_h, conjecture, (( g ) = ( h ))).
% 0.93/0.75 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( g ) != ( h )),
% 0.93/0.75 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_g_equals_h])).
% 0.93/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain, (((g) != (h))),
% 0.93/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.93/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl190, plain, ($false),
% 0.93/0.75 inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 0.93/0.75 [zip_derived_cl189, zip_derived_cl15])).
% 0.93/0.75
% 0.93/0.75 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.93/0.75
% 0.93/0.75
% 0.93/0.75 % Terminating...
% 1.13/0.87 % Runner terminated.
% 1.13/0.89 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------