↑ Up

Drodi-SAT---4.1.1.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Drodi-SAT---4.1.1
% Problem  : CAT004-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : drodi -satmode(on) -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:07:41 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.09s 0.54s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : CAT004-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : drodi -satmode(on) -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.49  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.49  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.49  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.49  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.49  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.49  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.49  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.49  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 13:58:08 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.49  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.50  % Drodi V4.1.1
% 0.09/0.54  % Refutation found
% 0.09/0.54  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark: Theory is unsatisfiable
% 0.09/0.54  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.54  fof(f9,axiom,(
% 0.09/0.54    (![X,Y,Z]: (compose(X,compose(Y,Z)) = compose(compose(X,Y),Z) ))),
% 0.09/0.54    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.09/0.54  fof(f19,hypothesis,(
% 0.09/0.54    (![X,Y,Z]: (( compose(X,a) != Y| compose(Z,a) != Y| X = Z ) ))),
% 0.09/0.54    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.09/0.54  fof(f20,hypothesis,(
% 0.09/0.54    (![X,Y,Z]: (( compose(X,b) != Y| compose(Z,b) != Y| X = Z ) ))),
% 0.09/0.54    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.09/0.54  fof(f22,hypothesis,(
% 0.09/0.54    compose(h,compose(a,b)) = compose(g,compose(a,b)) ),
% 0.09/0.54    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.09/0.54  fof(f23,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.09/0.54    h != g ),
% 0.09/0.54    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.09/0.54  fof(f34,plain,(
% 0.09/0.54    ![X0,X1,X2]: (compose(X0,compose(X1,X2))=compose(compose(X0,X1),X2))),
% 0.09/0.54    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 0.09/0.54  fof(f46,plain,(
% 0.09/0.54    ![X,Z]: ((![Y]: (~compose(X,a)=Y|~compose(Z,a)=Y))|X=Z)),
% 0.09/0.54    inference(miniscoping,[status(thm)],[f19])).
% 0.09/0.54  fof(f47,plain,(
% 0.09/0.54    ![X0,X1,X2]: (~compose(X0,a)=X1|~compose(X2,a)=X1|X0=X2)),
% 0.09/0.54    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f46])).
% 0.09/0.54  fof(f48,plain,(
% 0.09/0.54    ![X,Z]: ((![Y]: (~compose(X,b)=Y|~compose(Z,b)=Y))|X=Z)),
% 0.09/0.54    inference(miniscoping,[status(thm)],[f20])).
% 0.09/0.54  fof(f49,plain,(
% 0.09/0.54    ![X0,X1,X2]: (~compose(X0,b)=X1|~compose(X2,b)=X1|X0=X2)),
% 0.09/0.54    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f48])).
% 0.09/0.54  fof(f51,plain,(
% 0.09/0.54    compose(h,compose(a,b))=compose(g,compose(a,b))),
% 0.09/0.54    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f22])).
% 0.09/0.54  fof(f52,plain,(
% 0.09/0.54    ~h=g),
% 0.09/0.54    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f23])).
% 0.09/0.54  fof(f56,plain,(
% 0.09/0.54    ![X0,X1]: (~compose(X0,a)=compose(X1,a)|X1=X0)),
% 0.09/0.54    inference(destructive_equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f47])).
% 0.09/0.54  fof(f57,plain,(
% 0.09/0.54    ![X0,X1]: (~compose(X0,b)=compose(X1,b)|X1=X0)),
% 0.09/0.54    inference(destructive_equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f49])).
% 0.09/0.54  fof(f67,plain,(
% 0.09/0.54    ![X0,X1,X2]: (~compose(X0,b)=compose(X1,compose(X2,b))|compose(X1,X2)=X0)),
% 0.09/0.54    inference(paramodulation,[status(thm)],[f34,f57])).
% 0.09/0.54  fof(f125,plain,(
% 0.09/0.54    ![X0]: (~compose(X0,b)=compose(g,compose(a,b))|compose(h,a)=X0)),
% 0.09/0.54    inference(paramodulation,[status(thm)],[f51,f67])).
% 0.09/0.54  fof(f163,plain,(
% 0.09/0.54    compose(h,a)=compose(g,a)),
% 0.09/0.54    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f125,f34])).
% 0.09/0.54  fof(f171,plain,(
% 0.09/0.54    g=h),
% 0.09/0.54    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f163,f56])).
% 0.09/0.54  fof(f182,plain,(
% 0.09/0.54    $false),
% 0.09/0.54    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f171,f52])).
% 0.09/0.54  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.56  % Elapsed time: 0.066397 seconds
% 0.09/0.56  % CPU time: 0.251187 seconds
% 0.09/0.56  % Total memory used: 105.412 MB
% 0.09/0.56  % Net memory used: 104.894 MB
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------