↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : CAT004-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:07:06 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.55s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   11 (  10 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(associativity_of_compose,axiom,
    compose(X,compose(Y,Z)) = compose(compose(X,Y),Z),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CAT003-0.ax',associativity_of_compose) ).

cnf(cancellation_for_product1,hypothesis,
    ( compose(X,a) != Y
    | compose(Z,a) != Y
    | X = Z ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cancellation_for_product1) ).

cnf(cancellation_for_product2,hypothesis,
    ( compose(X,b) != Y
    | compose(Z,b) != Y
    | X = Z ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cancellation_for_product2) ).

cnf(h_ab_equals_g_ab,hypothesis,
    compose(h,compose(a,b)) = compose(g,compose(a,b)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',h_ab_equals_g_ab) ).

cnf(prove_h_equals_g,negated_conjecture,
    h != g,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_h_equals_g) ).

cnf(70,plain,
    compose(h,a) != compose(g,a),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cancellation_for_product1,prove_h_equals_g,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(159,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cancellation_for_product2,70,theory(equality)]),h_ab_equals_g_ab,associativity_of_compose,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : CAT004-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun May 29 18:46:58 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  "."
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-29T18:46:58
% 0.19/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n029.cluster.edu at 2022-05-29T18:46:58
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.55  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|compose| ?X (|compose| ?Y ?Z)) (|compose| (|compose| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.19/0.55  
% 0.19/0.55  #||
% 0.19/0.55  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.55  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.55  ||#
% 0.19/0.55  
% 0.19/0.55  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.19/0.55  ;       463 formulas have been input or derived (from 48 formulas).
% 0.19/0.55  ;       159 (34%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.19/0.55  ;            4 ( 3%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.19/0.55  ;          155 (97%) are still being kept.
% 0.19/0.55  ; 
% 0.19/0.55  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.19/0.55  ;     0.004   5%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.19/0.55  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (23 calls)
% 0.19/0.55  ;     0.016  20%   Process new row              (352 calls)
% 0.19/0.55  ;     0.014  18%   Resolution                   (94 calls)
% 0.19/0.55  ;     0.002   2%   Paramodulation               (47 calls)
% 0.19/0.55  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (2 calls)
% 0.19/0.55  ;     0.002   2%   Condensing                   (90 calls)
% 0.19/0.55  ;     0.004   5%   Forward subsumption          (90 calls)
% 0.19/0.55  ;     0.003   4%   Backward subsumption         (78 calls)
% 0.19/0.55  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (199 calls)
% 0.19/0.55  ;     0.006   8%   Forward simplification       (352 calls)
% 0.19/0.55  ;     0.002   2%   Backward simplification      (159 calls)
% 0.19/0.55  ;     0.002   2%   Ordering                     (419 calls)
% 0.19/0.55  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.19/0.55  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.19/0.55  ;     0.025  31%   Other
% 0.19/0.55  ;     0.080        Total
% 0.19/0.55  ;     0.082        Real time
% 0.19/0.55  ; 
% 0.19/0.55  ; Term-hash-array has 344 terms in all.
% 0.19/0.55  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 76 entries (76 at peak, 78 added, 2 deleted).
% 0.19/0.55  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 258 nodes (258 at peak, 276 added, 18 deleted).
% 0.19/0.55  ;  Retrieved 170 possibly forward subsuming rows in 90 calls.
% 0.19/0.55  ;  Retrieved 31 possibly backward subsumed rows in 78 calls.
% 0.19/0.55  ; Path-index has 346 entries (346 at peak, 348 added, 2 deleted).
% 0.19/0.55  ; Path-index has 645 nodes (645 at peak, 647 added, 2 deleted).
% 0.19/0.55  ; Trie-index has 346 entries (346 at peak, 348 added, 2 deleted).
% 0.19/0.55  ; Trie-index has 849 nodes (849 at peak, 854 added, 5 deleted).
% 0.19/0.55  ; Retrieved 381 generalization terms in 965 calls.
% 0.19/0.55  ; Retrieved 97 instance terms in 96 calls.
% 0.19/0.55  ; Retrieved 6,443 unifiable terms in 552 calls.
% 0.19/0.55  ; 
% 0.19/0.55  ; The agenda of rows to process has 31 entries:
% 0.19/0.55  ;    15 with value 16             16 with value 25
% 0.19/0.55  ; The agenda of rows to give has 107 entries:
% 0.19/0.55  ;    13 with value (4 10)          4 with value (4 18)           4 with value (4 28)
% 0.19/0.55  ;    10 with value (4 11)          4 with value (4 19)           2 with value (4 29)
% 0.19/0.55  ;    10 with value (4 12)         10 with value (4 20)           2 with value (4 30)
% 0.19/0.55  ;    10 with value (4 13)          4 with value (4 21)           4 with value (4 31)
% 0.19/0.55  ;     5 with value (4 14)          2 with value (4 25)           2 with value (4 34)
% 0.19/0.55  ;     7 with value (4 15)          4 with value (4 27)           8 with value (4 35)
% 0.19/0.55  ;     2 with value (4 16)
% 0.19/0.55  Evaluation took:
% 0.19/0.55    0.083 seconds of real time
% 0.19/0.55    0.069936 seconds of user run time
% 0.19/0.55    0.013046 seconds of system run time
% 0.19/0.55    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.19/0.55    0 page faults and
% 0.19/0.55    3,853,416 bytes consed.
% 0.19/0.55  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.55  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-29T18:46:58
% 0.19/0.55  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.55  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------