%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : lazyCoP---0.1 % Problem : CAT004-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:03:26 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 84.91s 11.20s % Output : Assurance 0s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----No solution output by system %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.11 % Problem : CAT004-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.03/0.12 % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 29 18:45:26 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 84.91/11.20 % SZS status Unsatisfiable % 84.91/11.20 % SZS output begin IncompleteProof % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c0, axiom, % 84.91/11.20 h != g). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c1, plain, % 84.91/11.20 h != g, % 84.91/11.20 inference(start, [], [c0])). % 84.91/11.20 % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c2, axiom, % 84.91/11.20 X0 = X1 | compose(X0,a) != compose(X1,a)). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(a0, assumption, % 84.91/11.20 g = X0). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c3, plain, % 84.91/11.20 $false, % 84.91/11.20 inference(variable_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c4, plain, % 84.91/11.20 compose(X0,a) != compose(X1,a), % 84.91/11.20 inference(variable_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c5, plain, % 84.91/11.20 X1 != X2 | h != X2, % 84.91/11.20 inference(variable_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])). % 84.91/11.20 % 84.91/11.20 cnf(a1, assumption, % 84.91/11.20 X1 = X2). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c6, plain, % 84.91/11.20 h != X2, % 84.91/11.20 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a1])], [c5])). % 84.91/11.20 % 84.91/11.20 cnf(a2, assumption, % 84.91/11.20 h = X2). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c7, plain, % 84.91/11.20 $false, % 84.91/11.20 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a2])], [c6])). % 84.91/11.20 % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c8, axiom, % 84.91/11.20 X3 = X4 | compose(X3,b) != compose(X4,b)). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(a3, assumption, % 84.91/11.20 compose(X0,a) = X4). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c9, plain, % 84.91/11.20 $false, % 84.91/11.20 inference(variable_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c4, c8])). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c10, plain, % 84.91/11.20 compose(X3,b) != compose(X4,b), % 84.91/11.20 inference(variable_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c4, c8])). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c11, plain, % 84.91/11.20 X3 != X5 | X5 != compose(X1,a), % 84.91/11.20 inference(variable_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c4, c8])). % 84.91/11.20 % 84.91/11.20 cnf(a4, assumption, % 84.91/11.20 X3 = X5). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c12, plain, % 84.91/11.20 X5 != compose(X1,a), % 84.91/11.20 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a4])], [c11])). % 84.91/11.20 % 84.91/11.20 cnf(a5, assumption, % 84.91/11.20 X5 = compose(X1,a)). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c13, plain, % 84.91/11.20 $false, % 84.91/11.20 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a5])], [c12])). % 84.91/11.20 % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c14, axiom, % 84.91/11.20 compose(X6,compose(X7,X8)) = compose(compose(X6,X7),X8)). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(a6, assumption, % 84.91/11.20 compose(X4,b) = compose(compose(X6,X7),X8)). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c15, plain, % 84.91/11.20 $false, % 84.91/11.20 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c10, c14])). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c16, plain, % 84.91/11.20 $false, % 84.91/11.20 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c10, c14])). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c17, plain, % 84.91/11.20 X9 != compose(X6,compose(X7,X8)) | compose(X3,b) != X9, % 84.91/11.20 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c10, c14])). % 84.91/11.20 % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c18, axiom, % 84.91/11.20 compose(h,compose(a,b)) = compose(g,compose(a,b))). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(a7, assumption, % 84.91/11.20 compose(X6,compose(X7,X8)) = compose(g,compose(a,b))). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c19, plain, % 84.91/11.20 compose(X3,b) != X9, % 84.91/11.20 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a7])], [c17, c18])). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c20, plain, % 84.91/11.20 $false, % 84.91/11.20 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a7])], [c17, c18])). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c21, plain, % 84.91/11.20 X10 != compose(h,compose(a,b)) | X9 != X10, % 84.91/11.20 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a7])], [c17, c18])). % 84.91/11.20 % 84.91/11.20 cnf(a8, assumption, % 84.91/11.20 X10 = compose(h,compose(a,b))). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c22, plain, % 84.91/11.20 X9 != X10, % 84.91/11.20 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a8])], [c21])). % 84.91/11.20 % 84.91/11.20 cnf(a9, assumption, % 84.91/11.20 X9 = X10). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c23, plain, % 84.91/11.20 $false, % 84.91/11.20 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a9])], [c22])). % 84.91/11.20 % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c24, axiom, % 84.91/11.20 compose(X11,compose(X12,X13)) = compose(compose(X11,X12),X13)). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(a10, assumption, % 84.91/11.20 compose(X3,b) = compose(compose(X11,X12),X13)). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c25, plain, % 84.91/11.20 $false, % 84.91/11.20 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a10])], [c19, c24])). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c26, plain, % 84.91/11.20 $false, % 84.91/11.20 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a10])], [c19, c24])). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c27, plain, % 84.91/11.20 X14 != compose(X11,compose(X12,X13)) | X14 != X9, % 84.91/11.20 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a10])], [c19, c24])). % 84.91/11.20 % 84.91/11.20 cnf(a11, assumption, % 84.91/11.20 X14 = compose(X11,compose(X12,X13))). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c28, plain, % 84.91/11.20 X14 != X9, % 84.91/11.20 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a11])], [c27])). % 84.91/11.20 % 84.91/11.20 cnf(a12, assumption, % 84.91/11.20 X14 = X9). % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c29, plain, % 84.91/11.20 $false, % 84.91/11.20 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a12])], [c28])). % 84.91/11.20 % 84.91/11.20 cnf(c30, plain, % 84.91/11.20 $false, % 84.91/11.20 inference(constraint_solving, [ % 84.91/11.20 bind(X0, g), % 84.91/11.20 bind(X1, h), % 84.91/11.20 bind(X2, h), % 84.91/11.20 bind(X3, compose(X1,a)), % 84.91/11.20 bind(X4, compose(X0,a)), % 84.91/11.20 bind(X5, compose(X1,a)), % 84.91/11.20 bind(X6, g), % 84.91/11.20 bind(X7, a), % 84.91/11.20 bind(X8, b), % 84.91/11.20 bind(X9, compose(h,compose(a,b))), % 84.91/11.20 bind(X10, compose(h,compose(a,b))), % 84.91/11.20 bind(X11, h), % 84.91/11.20 bind(X12, a), % 84.91/11.20 bind(X13, b), % 84.91/11.20 bind(X14, compose(X11,compose(X12,X13))) % 84.91/11.20 ], % 84.91/11.20 [a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10, a11, a12])). % 84.91/11.20 % 84.91/11.20 % SZS output end IncompleteProof %------------------------------------------------------------------------------