↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : CAT005-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:01:07 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.35s 1.17s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  16 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   87 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   64 (  34   ~;  30   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   2 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   0 sgn  33   !;   0   ?;  19   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( defined(X1,X3)
      | ~ defined(X2,X3)
      | ~ product(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CAT001-0.ax',associative_property2) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0] : identity_map(domain(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CAT001-0.ax',domain_is_an_identity_map) ).

fof(f14,axiom,
    ! [X0] : product(X0,domain(X0),X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CAT001-0.ax',product_on_domain) ).

fof(f16,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( product(X0,X1,X1)
      | ~ identity_map(X0)
      | ~ defined(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CAT001-0.ax',identity1) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( product(X0,X1,X0)
      | ~ identity_map(X1)
      | ~ defined(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CAT001-0.ax',identity2) ).

fof(f18,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( X2 = X3
      | ~ product(X0,X1,X3)
      | ~ product(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CAT001-0.ax',composition_is_well_defined) ).

fof(f19,axiom,
    defined(a,d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ad_defined) ).

fof(f20,axiom,
    identity_map(d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d_is_identity_map) ).

fof(f21,negated_conjecture,
    domain(a) != d,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_domain_of_a_is_d) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    d != domain(a),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f21]) ).

tcf(c_72,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( defined(X1,X3)
      | ~ defined(X2,X3)
      | ~ product(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_79,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : identity_map(domain(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tcf(c_83,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : product(X0,domain(X0),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tcf(c_85,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( product(X0,X1,X1)
      | ~ identity_map(X0)
      | ~ defined(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tcf(c_86,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( product(X0,X1,X0)
      | ~ identity_map(X1)
      | ~ defined(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tcf(c_87,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( X2 = X3 )
      | ~ product(X0,X1,X3)
      | ~ product(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

tcf(c_88,plain,
    defined(a,d),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tcf(c_89,plain,
    identity_map(d),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tcf(c_90,negated_conjecture,
    domain(a) != d,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tcf(c_387,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = domain(a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_388,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_10 != d,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_90,c_387]) ).

tcf(c_669,plain,
    product(a,iPr_def_10,a),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_387,c_83]) ).

tcf(c_671,plain,
    identity_map(iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_387,c_79]) ).

tcf(c_707,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( defined(iPr_def_10,X0)
      | ~ defined(a,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_669,c_72]) ).

tcf(c_719,plain,
    ( defined(iPr_def_10,d)
    | ~ defined(a,d) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_707]) ).

tcf(c_882,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( iPr_def_10 = d )
      | ~ product(X0,X1,iPr_def_10)
      | ~ product(X0,X1,d) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_87]) ).

tcf(c_2233,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( product(iPr_def_10,X0,iPr_def_10)
      | ~ identity_map(X0)
      | ~ defined(iPr_def_10,X0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_86]) ).

tcf(c_2234,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( iPr_def_10 = d )
      | ~ product(iPr_def_10,X0,iPr_def_10)
      | ~ product(iPr_def_10,X0,d) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_882]) ).

tcf(c_2235,plain,
    ( product(iPr_def_10,d,iPr_def_10)
    | ~ identity_map(d)
    | ~ defined(iPr_def_10,d) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_2233]) ).

tcf(c_2236,plain,
    ( ( iPr_def_10 = d )
    | ~ product(iPr_def_10,d,iPr_def_10)
    | ~ product(iPr_def_10,d,d) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_2234]) ).

tcf(c_3181,plain,
    ( product(iPr_def_10,d,d)
    | ~ identity_map(iPr_def_10)
    | ~ defined(iPr_def_10,d) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_85]) ).

tcf(c_3182,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_3181,c_2236,c_2235,c_719,c_671,c_388,c_88,c_89]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CAT005-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 06:57:13 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.42  
% 0.09/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.09/0.42  
% 0.09/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.09/0.43  % Proving...
% 3.35/1.17  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.35/1.17  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.35/1.17  
% 3.35/1.17  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.35/1.17  
% 3.35/1.17  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.35/1.17  
% 3.35/1.17  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.35/1.17  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.35/1.17  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.35/1.17  
% 3.35/1.17  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.35/1.17  
% 3.35/1.17  
% 3.35/1.17  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.35/1.17  
% 3.35/1.17  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.35/1.17  
% 3.35/1.17  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.35/1.17  
% 3.35/1.17  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.35/1.17  % ------ Proving...
% 3.35/1.17  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.35/1.17  
% 3.35/1.17  % 
% 3.35/1.17  % clauses                               22
% 3.35/1.17  % conjectures                           1
% 3.35/1.17  % EPR                                   14
% 3.35/1.17  % Horn                                  22
% 3.35/1.17  % unary                                 10
% 3.35/1.17  % binary                                2
% 3.35/1.17  % lits                                  49
% 3.35/1.17  % lits eq                               3
% 3.35/1.17  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.35/1.17  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.35/1.17  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.35/1.17  % fd_pseudo_cond                        1
% 3.35/1.17  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.35/1.17  
% 3.35/1.17  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.35/1.17  
% 3.35/1.17  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.35/1.17  
% 3.35/1.17  
% 3.35/1.17  % ------ 
% 3.35/1.17  % Current options:
% 3.35/1.17  % ------ 
% 3.35/1.17  
% 3.35/1.17  
% 3.35/1.17  % 
% 3.35/1.17  
% 3.35/1.17  % ------ Proving...
% 3.35/1.17  % 
% 3.35/1.17  
% 3.35/1.17  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.35/1.17  
% 3.35/1.17  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.35/1.17  
% 3.35/1.17  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------