↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : CAT005-3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FsnVNzDbKt true

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:29:57 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.49s 0.64s
% Output   : Refutation 0.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.14/0.16  % Problem  : CAT005-3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.14/0.16  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FsnVNzDbKt true
% 0.17/0.37  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 10:44:23 EDT 2025
% 0.17/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.37  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.17/0.37  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.37  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.17/0.37  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.17/0.38  % Running in FO mode
% 0.42/0.55  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.42/0.55  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.42/0.55  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.45/0.60  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.45/0.61  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.45/0.61  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.45/0.63  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.45/0.63  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.45/0.63  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.49/0.63  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.49/0.64  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.49/0.64  % BCE start: 21
% 0.49/0.64  % BCE eliminated: 1
% 0.49/0.64  % PE start: 20
% 0.49/0.64  logic: eq
% 0.49/0.64  % PE eliminated: 3
% 0.49/0.64  % done 26 iterations in 0.016s
% 0.49/0.64  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.49/0.64  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.49/0.64  thf(compose_type, type, compose: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(domain_type, type, domain: $i > $i).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(there_exists_type, type, there_exists: $i > $o).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(codomain_type, type, codomain: $i > $i).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(xd_equals_x, axiom,
% 0.49/0.64    (( ~( there_exists @ ( compose @ X @ d ) ) ) | 
% 0.49/0.64     ( ( compose @ X @ d ) = ( X ) ))).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain,
% 0.49/0.64      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.64         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ d)) | ((compose @ X0 @ d) = (X0)))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [xd_equals_x])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(ad_exists, axiom, (there_exists @ ( compose @ a @ d ))).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain, ( (there_exists @ (compose @ a @ d))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ad_exists])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl85, plain, (((compose @ a @ d) = (a))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl17])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(domain_codomain_composition1, axiom,
% 0.49/0.64    (( ~( there_exists @ ( compose @ X @ Y ) ) ) | 
% 0.49/0.64     ( ( domain @ X ) = ( codomain @ Y ) ))).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.49/0.64      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.64         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.49/0.64          | ((domain @ X0) = (codomain @ X1)))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [domain_codomain_composition1])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl99, plain,
% 0.49/0.64      ((~ (there_exists @ a) | ((domain @ a) = (codomain @ d)))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl85, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain, ( (there_exists @ (compose @ a @ d))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ad_exists])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl85, plain, (((compose @ a @ d) = (a))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl17])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl89, plain, ( (there_exists @ a)),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl85])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl100, plain, (((domain @ a) = (codomain @ d))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl99, zip_derived_cl89])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(codomain_has_elements, axiom,
% 0.49/0.64    (( ~( there_exists @ ( codomain @ X ) ) ) | ( there_exists @ X ))).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.49/0.64      (![X0 : $i]: (~ (there_exists @ (codomain @ X0)) |  (there_exists @ X0))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [codomain_has_elements])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl101, plain,
% 0.49/0.64      ((~ (there_exists @ (domain @ a)) |  (there_exists @ d))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl100, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl100, plain, (((domain @ a) = (codomain @ d))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl99, zip_derived_cl89])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(compose_codomain, axiom, (( compose @ ( codomain @ X ) @ X ) = ( X ))).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 0.49/0.64      (![X0 : $i]: ((compose @ (codomain @ X0) @ X0) = (X0))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [compose_codomain])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain,
% 0.49/0.64      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.64         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ d)) | ((compose @ X0 @ d) = (X0)))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [xd_equals_x])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl87, plain,
% 0.49/0.64      ((~ (there_exists @ d)
% 0.49/0.64        | ((compose @ (codomain @ d) @ d) = (codomain @ d)))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10, zip_derived_cl18])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 0.49/0.64      (![X0 : $i]: ((compose @ (codomain @ X0) @ X0) = (X0))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [compose_codomain])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl88, plain,
% 0.49/0.64      ((~ (there_exists @ d) | ((d) = (codomain @ d)))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl87, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl103, plain,
% 0.49/0.64      ((((d) = (domain @ a)) | ~ (there_exists @ d))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl100, zip_derived_cl88])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(prove_domain_of_a_is_d, conjecture, (( domain @ a ) = ( d ))).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( domain @ a ) != ( d )),
% 0.49/0.64    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_domain_of_a_is_d])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain, (((domain @ a) != (d))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl104, plain, (~ (there_exists @ d)),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 0.49/0.64                [zip_derived_cl103, zip_derived_cl20])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl165, plain, (~ (there_exists @ (domain @ a))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl101, zip_derived_cl104])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl85, plain, (((compose @ a @ d) = (a))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl17])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(composition_implies_domain, axiom,
% 0.49/0.64    (( ~( there_exists @ ( compose @ X @ Y ) ) ) | 
% 0.49/0.64     ( there_exists @ ( domain @ X ) ))).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.49/0.64      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.49/0.64         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.49/0.64          |  (there_exists @ (domain @ X0)))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [composition_implies_domain])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl90, plain,
% 0.49/0.64      ((~ (there_exists @ a) |  (there_exists @ (domain @ a)))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl85, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl89, plain, ( (there_exists @ a)),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl85])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl166, plain, ( (there_exists @ (domain @ a))),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl90, zip_derived_cl89])).
% 0.49/0.64  thf(zip_derived_cl167, plain, ($false),
% 0.49/0.64      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl165, zip_derived_cl166])).
% 0.49/0.64  
% 0.49/0.64  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.49/0.64  
% 0.49/0.64  
% 0.49/0.64  % Terminating...
% 0.57/0.75  % Runner terminated.
% 1.34/0.76  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------