↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : CAT005-4 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xBwKn6yfNR true

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:29:57 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.75s
% Output   : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : CAT005-4 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.xBwKn6yfNR true
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 10:48:08 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.34  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.54/0.64  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.54/0.64  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.54/0.64  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.54/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.75  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.56/0.75  % BCE start: 15
% 0.56/0.75  % BCE eliminated: 1
% 0.56/0.75  % PE start: 14
% 0.56/0.75  logic: eq
% 0.56/0.75  % PE eliminated: 2
% 0.56/0.75  % done 23 iterations in 0.012s
% 0.56/0.75  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.56/0.75  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.56/0.75  thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(compose_type, type, compose: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(domain_type, type, domain: $i > $i).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(there_exists_type, type, there_exists: $i > $o).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(codomain_type, type, codomain: $i > $i).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(compose_domain, axiom, (( compose @ X @ ( domain @ X ) ) = ( X ))).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 0.56/0.75      (![X0 : $i]: ((compose @ X0 @ (domain @ X0)) = (X0))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [compose_domain])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(dy_equals_y, axiom,
% 0.56/0.75    (( ~( there_exists @ ( compose @ d @ Y ) ) ) | 
% 0.56/0.75     ( ( compose @ d @ Y ) = ( Y ) ))).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 0.56/0.75      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.75         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ d @ X0)) | ((compose @ d @ X0) = (X0)))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [dy_equals_y])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl60, plain,
% 0.56/0.75      ((~ (there_exists @ d) | ((compose @ d @ (domain @ d)) = (domain @ d)))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9, zip_derived_cl13])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 0.56/0.75      (![X0 : $i]: ((compose @ X0 @ (domain @ X0)) = (X0))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [compose_domain])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl61, plain, ((~ (there_exists @ d) | ((d) = (domain @ d)))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl60, zip_derived_cl9])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(domain_codomain_composition1, axiom,
% 0.56/0.75    (( ~( there_exists @ ( compose @ X @ Y ) ) ) | 
% 0.56/0.75     ( ( domain @ X ) = ( codomain @ Y ) ))).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.56/0.75      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.75         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.56/0.75          | ((domain @ X0) = (codomain @ X1)))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [domain_codomain_composition1])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(ad_exists, axiom, (there_exists @ ( compose @ a @ d ))).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain, ( (there_exists @ (compose @ a @ d))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ad_exists])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl62, plain, (((domain @ a) = (codomain @ d))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(codomain_has_elements, axiom,
% 0.56/0.75    (( ~( there_exists @ ( codomain @ X ) ) ) | ( there_exists @ X ))).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.56/0.75      (![X0 : $i]: (~ (there_exists @ (codomain @ X0)) |  (there_exists @ X0))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [codomain_has_elements])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl80, plain,
% 0.56/0.75      ((~ (there_exists @ (domain @ a)) |  (there_exists @ d))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl62, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(composition_implies_domain, axiom,
% 0.56/0.75    (( ~( there_exists @ ( compose @ X @ Y ) ) ) | 
% 0.56/0.75     ( there_exists @ ( domain @ X ) ))).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.56/0.75      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.75         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.56/0.75          |  (there_exists @ (domain @ X0)))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [composition_implies_domain])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain, ( (there_exists @ (compose @ a @ d))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ad_exists])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl50, plain, ( (there_exists @ (domain @ a))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl82, plain, ( (there_exists @ d)),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl80, zip_derived_cl50])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl102, plain, (((d) = (domain @ d))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl61, zip_derived_cl82])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 0.56/0.75      (![X0 : $i]: ((compose @ X0 @ (domain @ X0)) = (X0))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [compose_domain])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl104, plain, (((compose @ d @ d) = (d))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl102, zip_derived_cl9])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.56/0.75      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.75         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.56/0.75          | ((domain @ X0) = (codomain @ X1)))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [domain_codomain_composition1])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl107, plain,
% 0.56/0.75      ((~ (there_exists @ d) | ((domain @ d) = (codomain @ d)))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl104, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl82, plain, ( (there_exists @ d)),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl80, zip_derived_cl50])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl102, plain, (((d) = (domain @ d))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl61, zip_derived_cl82])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl62, plain, (((domain @ a) = (codomain @ d))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl113, plain, (((d) = (domain @ a))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.56/0.75                [zip_derived_cl107, zip_derived_cl82, zip_derived_cl102, 
% 0.56/0.75                 zip_derived_cl62])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(prove_domain_of_a_is_d, conjecture, (( domain @ a ) = ( d ))).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( domain @ a ) != ( d )),
% 0.56/0.75    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_domain_of_a_is_d])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain, (((domain @ a) != (d))),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.56/0.75  thf(zip_derived_cl114, plain, ($false),
% 0.56/0.75      inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 0.56/0.75                [zip_derived_cl113, zip_derived_cl14])).
% 0.56/0.75  
% 0.56/0.75  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.56/0.75  
% 0.56/0.75  
% 0.56/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.75  % Terminating...
% 0.60/0.85  % Runner terminated.
% 1.54/0.86  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------