↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : CAT006-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:01:07 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.58s 1.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  16 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   87 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   64 (  34   ~;  30   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   2 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   0 sgn  33   !;   0   ?;  19   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( defined(X3,X0)
      | ~ defined(X3,X2)
      | ~ product(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CAT001-0.ax',category_theory_axiom3) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0] : identity_map(codomain(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CAT001-0.ax',codomain_is_an_identity_map) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] : product(codomain(X0),X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CAT001-0.ax',product_on_codomain) ).

fof(f16,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( product(X0,X1,X1)
      | ~ identity_map(X0)
      | ~ defined(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CAT001-0.ax',identity1) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( product(X0,X1,X0)
      | ~ identity_map(X1)
      | ~ defined(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CAT001-0.ax',identity2) ).

fof(f18,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( X2 = X3
      | ~ product(X0,X1,X3)
      | ~ product(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CAT001-0.ax',composition_is_well_defined) ).

fof(f19,axiom,
    defined(h,a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ha_defined) ).

fof(f20,axiom,
    identity_map(h),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',h_is_the_identity_map) ).

fof(f21,negated_conjecture,
    codomain(a) != h,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_codomain_of_a_is_h) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    h != codomain(a),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f21]) ).

tcf(c_75,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( defined(X3,X0)
      | ~ defined(X3,X2)
      | ~ product(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_80,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : identity_map(codomain(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tcf(c_84,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : product(codomain(X0),X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_85,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( product(X0,X1,X1)
      | ~ identity_map(X0)
      | ~ defined(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tcf(c_86,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( product(X0,X1,X0)
      | ~ identity_map(X1)
      | ~ defined(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tcf(c_87,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( X2 = X3 )
      | ~ product(X0,X1,X3)
      | ~ product(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

tcf(c_88,plain,
    defined(h,a),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tcf(c_89,plain,
    identity_map(h),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tcf(c_90,negated_conjecture,
    codomain(a) != h,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tcf(c_387,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = codomain(a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_388,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_10 != h,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_90,c_387]) ).

tcf(c_670,plain,
    identity_map(iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_387,c_80]) ).

tcf(c_671,plain,
    product(iPr_def_10,a,a),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_387,c_84]) ).

tcf(c_733,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( defined(X0,iPr_def_10)
      | ~ defined(X0,a) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_671,c_75]) ).

tcf(c_745,plain,
    ( defined(h,iPr_def_10)
    | ~ defined(h,a) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_733]) ).

tcf(c_887,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( iPr_def_10 = h )
      | ~ product(X0,X1,iPr_def_10)
      | ~ product(X0,X1,h) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_87]) ).

tcf(c_2273,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( product(X0,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10)
      | ~ identity_map(X0)
      | ~ defined(X0,iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_85]) ).

tcf(c_2274,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( iPr_def_10 = h )
      | ~ product(X0,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10)
      | ~ product(X0,iPr_def_10,h) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_887]) ).

tcf(c_2275,plain,
    ( product(h,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10)
    | ~ identity_map(h)
    | ~ defined(h,iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_2273]) ).

tcf(c_2276,plain,
    ( ( iPr_def_10 = h )
    | ~ product(h,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10)
    | ~ product(h,iPr_def_10,h) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_2274]) ).

tcf(c_2870,plain,
    ( product(h,iPr_def_10,h)
    | ~ identity_map(iPr_def_10)
    | ~ defined(h,iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_86]) ).

tcf(c_2871,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_2870,c_2276,c_2275,c_745,c_670,c_388,c_88,c_89]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : CAT006-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 06:50:38 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.35  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.12/0.42  % Proving...
% 3.58/1.27  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.58/1.27  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.58/1.27  
% 3.58/1.27  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.58/1.27  
% 3.58/1.27  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.58/1.27  
% 3.58/1.27  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.58/1.27  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.58/1.27  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.58/1.27  
% 3.58/1.27  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.58/1.27  
% 3.58/1.27  
% 3.58/1.27  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.58/1.27  
% 3.58/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.58/1.27  
% 3.58/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.58/1.27  
% 3.58/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.58/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 3.58/1.27  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.58/1.27  
% 3.58/1.27  % 
% 3.58/1.27  % clauses                               22
% 3.58/1.27  % conjectures                           1
% 3.58/1.27  % EPR                                   14
% 3.58/1.27  % Horn                                  22
% 3.58/1.27  % unary                                 10
% 3.58/1.27  % binary                                2
% 3.58/1.27  % lits                                  49
% 3.58/1.27  % lits eq                               3
% 3.58/1.27  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.58/1.27  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.58/1.27  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.58/1.27  % fd_pseudo_cond                        1
% 3.58/1.27  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.58/1.27  
% 3.58/1.27  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.58/1.27  
% 3.58/1.27  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.58/1.27  
% 3.58/1.27  
% 3.58/1.27  % ------ 
% 3.58/1.27  % Current options:
% 3.58/1.27  % ------ 
% 3.58/1.27  
% 3.58/1.27  
% 3.58/1.27  % 
% 3.58/1.27  
% 3.58/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 3.58/1.27  % 
% 3.58/1.27  
% 3.58/1.27  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.58/1.27  
% 3.58/1.27  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.58/1.27  
% 3.58/1.27  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------