%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : CAT006-3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.crPlHr3XPX true
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:29:57 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.40s 0.85s
% Output : Refutation 0.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : CAT006-3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.crPlHr3XPX true
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 10:49:53 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.36 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.39 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.39 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.39 % Running in FO mode
% 0.37/0.72 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.37/0.72 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.37/0.72 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.40/0.81 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.40/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.40/0.83 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.40/0.85 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.40/0.85 % BCE start: 21
% 0.40/0.85 % BCE eliminated: 1
% 0.40/0.85 % PE start: 20
% 0.40/0.85 logic: eq
% 0.40/0.85 % PE eliminated: 3
% 0.40/0.85 % done 16 iterations in 0.018s
% 0.40/0.85 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.40/0.85 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.40/0.85 thf(compose_type, type, compose: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(domain_type, type, domain: $i > $i).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(there_exists_type, type, there_exists: $i > $o).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(codomain_type, type, codomain: $i > $i).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(compose_codomain, axiom, (( compose @ ( codomain @ X ) @ X ) = ( X ))).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 0.40/0.85 (![X0 : $i]: ((compose @ (codomain @ X0) @ X0) = (X0))),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [compose_codomain])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(xd_equals_x, axiom,
% 0.40/0.85 (( ~( there_exists @ ( compose @ X @ d ) ) ) |
% 0.40/0.85 ( ( compose @ X @ d ) = ( X ) ))).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain,
% 0.40/0.85 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.40/0.85 (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ d)) | ((compose @ X0 @ d) = (X0)))),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [xd_equals_x])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl77, plain,
% 0.40/0.85 ((~ (there_exists @ d) | ((d) = (codomain @ d)))),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10, zip_derived_cl18])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(da_exists, axiom, (there_exists @ ( compose @ d @ a ))).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain, ( (there_exists @ (compose @ d @ a))),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [da_exists])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(composition_implies_domain, axiom,
% 0.40/0.85 (( ~( there_exists @ ( compose @ X @ Y ) ) ) |
% 0.40/0.85 ( there_exists @ ( domain @ X ) ))).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.40/0.85 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.40/0.85 (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.40/0.85 | (there_exists @ (domain @ X0)))),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [composition_implies_domain])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl78, plain, ( (there_exists @ (domain @ d))),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(domain_has_elements, axiom,
% 0.40/0.85 (( ~( there_exists @ ( domain @ X ) ) ) | ( there_exists @ X ))).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.40/0.85 (![X0 : $i]: (~ (there_exists @ (domain @ X0)) | (there_exists @ X0))),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [domain_has_elements])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl81, plain, ( (there_exists @ d)),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl78, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl82, plain, (((d) = (codomain @ d))),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl77, zip_derived_cl81])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 0.40/0.85 (![X0 : $i]: ((compose @ (codomain @ X0) @ X0) = (X0))),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [compose_codomain])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl87, plain, (((compose @ d @ d) = (d))),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl82, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(domain_codomain_composition1, axiom,
% 0.40/0.85 (( ~( there_exists @ ( compose @ X @ Y ) ) ) |
% 0.40/0.85 ( ( domain @ X ) = ( codomain @ Y ) ))).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.40/0.85 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.40/0.85 (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.40/0.85 | ((domain @ X0) = (codomain @ X1)))),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [domain_codomain_composition1])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl94, plain,
% 0.40/0.85 ((~ (there_exists @ d) | ((domain @ d) = (codomain @ d)))),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl87, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl81, plain, ( (there_exists @ d)),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl78, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl82, plain, (((d) = (codomain @ d))),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl77, zip_derived_cl81])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl97, plain, (((domain @ d) = (d))),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.40/0.85 [zip_derived_cl94, zip_derived_cl81, zip_derived_cl82])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(prove_codomain_of_a_is_d, conjecture, (( codomain @ a ) = ( d ))).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( codomain @ a ) != ( d )),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_codomain_of_a_is_d])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain, (((codomain @ a) != (d))),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain, ( (there_exists @ (compose @ d @ a))),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [da_exists])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.40/0.85 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.40/0.85 (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.40/0.85 | ((domain @ X0) = (codomain @ X1)))),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [domain_codomain_composition1])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl83, plain, (((domain @ d) = (codomain @ a))),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl89, plain, (((domain @ d) != (d))),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl20, zip_derived_cl83])).
% 0.40/0.85 thf(zip_derived_cl98, plain, ($false),
% 0.40/0.85 inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 0.40/0.85 [zip_derived_cl97, zip_derived_cl89])).
% 0.40/0.85
% 0.40/0.85 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.40/0.85
% 0.40/0.85
% 0.40/0.85 % Terminating...
% 1.35/0.94 % Runner terminated.
% 1.35/0.96 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------