↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : CAT009-3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OiK5A1jTKM true

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:29:58 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.62s 0.90s
% Output   : Refutation 0.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : CAT009-3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.OiK5A1jTKM true
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 10:43:53 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.58/0.69  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.58/0.69  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.58/0.69  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.61/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.62/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.62/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.62/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.62/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.62/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.62/0.81  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.62/0.90  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.62/0.90  % BCE start: 19
% 0.62/0.90  % BCE eliminated: 1
% 0.62/0.90  % PE start: 18
% 0.62/0.90  logic: eq
% 0.62/0.90  % PE eliminated: 3
% 0.62/0.90  % done 150 iterations in 0.107s
% 0.62/0.90  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.62/0.90  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.62/0.90  thf(compose_type, type, compose: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(domain_type, type, domain: $i > $i).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(there_exists_type, type, there_exists: $i > $o).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(codomain_type, type, codomain: $i > $i).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(compose_domain, axiom, (( compose @ X @ ( domain @ X ) ) = ( X ))).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i]: ((compose @ X0 @ (domain @ X0)) = (X0))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [compose_domain])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(ab_exists, axiom, (there_exists @ ( compose @ a @ b ))).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain, ( (there_exists @ (compose @ a @ b))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ab_exists])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(domain_codomain_composition1, axiom,
% 0.62/0.90    (( ~( there_exists @ ( compose @ X @ Y ) ) ) | 
% 0.62/0.90     ( ( domain @ X ) = ( codomain @ Y ) ))).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.90         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.62/0.90          | ((domain @ X0) = (codomain @ X1)))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [domain_codomain_composition1])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl71, plain, (((domain @ a) = (codomain @ b))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(compose_codomain, axiom, (( compose @ ( codomain @ X ) @ X ) = ( X ))).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i]: ((compose @ (codomain @ X0) @ X0) = (X0))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [compose_codomain])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl83, plain, (((compose @ (domain @ a) @ b) = (b))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl71, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(associativity_of_compose, axiom,
% 0.62/0.90    (( compose @ X @ ( compose @ Y @ Z ) ) =
% 0.62/0.90     ( compose @ ( compose @ X @ Y ) @ Z ))).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.90         ((compose @ X0 @ (compose @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.62/0.90           = (compose @ (compose @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_compose])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl96, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.90         ((compose @ (domain @ a) @ (compose @ b @ X0)) = (compose @ b @ X0))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl83, zip_derived_cl8])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.90         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.62/0.90          | ((domain @ X0) = (codomain @ X1)))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [domain_codomain_composition1])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl142, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.90         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ b @ X0))
% 0.62/0.90          | ((domain @ (domain @ a)) = (codomain @ (compose @ b @ X0))))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl96, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl83, plain, (((compose @ (domain @ a) @ b) = (b))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl71, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.90         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.62/0.90          | ((domain @ X0) = (codomain @ X1)))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [domain_codomain_composition1])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl86, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      ((~ (there_exists @ b) | ((domain @ (domain @ a)) = (codomain @ b)))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl83, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl71, plain, (((domain @ a) = (codomain @ b))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl88, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      ((~ (there_exists @ b) | ((domain @ (domain @ a)) = (domain @ a)))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl86, zip_derived_cl71])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl71, plain, (((domain @ a) = (codomain @ b))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(codomain_has_elements, axiom,
% 0.62/0.90    (( ~( there_exists @ ( codomain @ X ) ) ) | ( there_exists @ X ))).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i]: (~ (there_exists @ (codomain @ X0)) |  (there_exists @ X0))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [codomain_has_elements])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl82, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      ((~ (there_exists @ (domain @ a)) |  (there_exists @ b))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl71, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain, ( (there_exists @ (compose @ a @ b))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ab_exists])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(composition_implies_domain, axiom,
% 0.62/0.90    (( ~( there_exists @ ( compose @ X @ Y ) ) ) | 
% 0.62/0.90     ( there_exists @ ( domain @ X ) ))).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.90         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.62/0.90          |  (there_exists @ (domain @ X0)))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [composition_implies_domain])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl74, plain, ( (there_exists @ (domain @ a))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl84, plain, ( (there_exists @ b)),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl82, zip_derived_cl74])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl89, plain, (((domain @ (domain @ a)) = (domain @ a))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl88, zip_derived_cl84])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl147, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.90         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ b @ X0))
% 0.62/0.90          | ((domain @ a) = (codomain @ (compose @ b @ X0))))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl142, zip_derived_cl89])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl74, plain, ( (there_exists @ (domain @ a))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(domain_codomain_composition2, axiom,
% 0.62/0.90    (( ~( there_exists @ ( domain @ X ) ) ) | 
% 0.62/0.90     ( ( domain @ X ) != ( codomain @ Y ) ) | 
% 0.62/0.90     ( there_exists @ ( compose @ X @ Y ) ))).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.90         (~ (there_exists @ (domain @ X0))
% 0.62/0.90          | ((domain @ X0) != (codomain @ X1))
% 0.62/0.90          |  (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ X1)))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [domain_codomain_composition2])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl81, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.90         (((domain @ a) != (codomain @ X0))
% 0.62/0.90          |  (there_exists @ (compose @ a @ X0)))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl74, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl208, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.90         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ b @ X0))
% 0.62/0.90          | ((domain @ a) != (domain @ a))
% 0.62/0.90          |  (there_exists @ (compose @ a @ (compose @ b @ X0))))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl147, zip_derived_cl81])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl219, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.90         ( (there_exists @ (compose @ a @ (compose @ b @ X0)))
% 0.62/0.90          | ~ (there_exists @ (compose @ b @ X0)))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl208])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.90         ((compose @ X0 @ (compose @ X1 @ X2))
% 0.62/0.90           = (compose @ (compose @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_compose])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.90         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.62/0.90          | ((domain @ X0) = (codomain @ X1)))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [domain_codomain_composition1])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl91, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.90         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X2 @ (compose @ X1 @ X0)))
% 0.62/0.90          | ((domain @ (compose @ X2 @ X1)) = (codomain @ X0)))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl817, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.90         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ b @ X0))
% 0.62/0.90          | ((domain @ (compose @ a @ b)) = (codomain @ X0)))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl219, zip_derived_cl91])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(prove_domain_of_ab_equals_domain_of_b, conjecture,
% 0.62/0.90    (( domain @ ( compose @ a @ b ) ) = ( domain @ b ))).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.62/0.90    (( domain @ ( compose @ a @ b ) ) != ( domain @ b )),
% 0.62/0.90    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_domain_of_ab_equals_domain_of_b])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (((domain @ (compose @ a @ b)) != (domain @ b))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl901, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.90         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ b @ X0))
% 0.62/0.90          | ((codomain @ X0) != (domain @ b)))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl817, zip_derived_cl18])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.62/0.90         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.62/0.90          | ((domain @ X0) = (codomain @ X1)))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [domain_codomain_composition1])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl913, plain,
% 0.62/0.90      (![X0 : $i]: ~ (there_exists @ (compose @ b @ X0))),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('clc', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl901, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl914, plain, (~ (there_exists @ b)),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9, zip_derived_cl913])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl84, plain, ( (there_exists @ b)),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl82, zip_derived_cl74])).
% 0.62/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl919, plain, ($false),
% 0.62/0.90      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl914, zip_derived_cl84])).
% 0.62/0.90  
% 0.62/0.90  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.62/0.90  
% 0.62/0.90  
% 0.62/0.90  % Terminating...
% 0.66/1.01  % Runner terminated.
% 0.66/1.02  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------