↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : CAT011-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 04:40:14 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.22s 3.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : CAT011-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Jun 18 11:58:39 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.60  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 3.22/3.36  %-------------------------------------------
% 3.22/3.36  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 3.22/3.36  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 3.22/3.36  % Transform   :cnf
% 3.22/3.36  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 3.22/3.36  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 3.22/3.36  
% 3.22/3.36  % Result      :Theorem 2.670000s
% 3.22/3.36  % Output      :CNFRefutation 2.670000s
% 3.22/3.36  %-------------------------------------------
% 3.22/3.37  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 3.22/3.37  % File     : CAT011-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 3.22/3.37  % Domain   : Category Theory
% 3.22/3.37  % Problem  : domain(domain(x)) = domain(x)
% 3.22/3.37  % Version  : [Sco79] axioms : Reduced > Complete.
% 3.22/3.37  % English  :
% 3.22/3.37  
% 3.22/3.37  % Refs     : [Sco79] Scott (1979), Identity and Existence in Intuitionist L
% 3.22/3.37  % Source   : [ANL]
% 3.22/3.37  % Names    : p11.ver3.in [ANL]
% 3.22/3.37  
% 3.22/3.37  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 3.22/3.37  % Rating   : 0.10 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.5.0, 0.05 v7.4.0, 0.06 v7.3.0, 0.08 v7.1.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.13 v6.4.0, 0.07 v6.3.0, 0.09 v6.2.0, 0.10 v6.1.0, 0.21 v6.0.0, 0.10 v5.5.0, 0.35 v5.4.0, 0.30 v5.3.0, 0.33 v5.2.0, 0.19 v5.1.0, 0.12 v5.0.0, 0.07 v4.1.0, 0.08 v4.0.1, 0.18 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.5.0, 0.09 v3.4.0, 0.17 v3.3.0, 0.21 v3.2.0, 0.23 v3.1.0, 0.27 v2.7.0, 0.25 v2.6.0, 0.30 v2.5.0, 0.25 v2.4.0, 0.22 v2.3.0, 0.33 v2.2.1, 0.44 v2.2.0, 0.56 v2.1.0, 0.56 v2.0.0
% 3.22/3.37  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (   5 unt;   2 nHn;  14 RR)
% 3.22/3.37  %            Number of literals    :   39 (  16 equ;  18 neg)
% 3.22/3.37  %            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
% 3.22/3.37  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 3.22/3.37  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 3.22/3.37  %            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 3.22/3.37  %            Number of variables   :   31 (   4 sgn)
% 3.22/3.37  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN
% 3.22/3.37  
% 3.22/3.37  % Comments : Axioms simplified by Art Quaife.
% 3.22/3.37  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 3.22/3.37  %----Include Scott's axioms for category theory
% 3.22/3.37  include('Axioms/CAT003-0.ax').
% 3.22/3.37  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 3.22/3.37  cnf(assume_domain_exists,hypothesis,
% 3.22/3.37      there_exists(domain(a)) ).
% 3.22/3.37  
% 3.22/3.37  cnf(prove_domain_is_idempotent,negated_conjecture,
% 3.22/3.37      domain(domain(a)) != domain(a) ).
% 3.22/3.37  
% 3.22/3.37  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 3.22/3.37  %-------------------------------------------
% 3.22/3.37  % Proof found
% 3.22/3.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 3.22/3.37  % SZS output start Proof
% 3.22/3.38  %ClaNum:30(EqnAxiom:12)
% 3.22/3.38  %VarNum:58(SingletonVarNum:27)
% 3.22/3.38  %MaxLitNum:3
% 3.22/3.38  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 3.22/3.38  %SharedTerms:5
% 3.22/3.38  %goalClause: 17
% 3.22/3.38  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 3.22/3.38  [13]P1(f2(a1))
% 3.22/3.38  [17]~E(f2(f2(a1)),f2(a1))
% 3.22/3.38  [14]E(f3(x141,f2(x141)),x141)
% 3.22/3.38  [15]E(f3(f4(x151),x151),x151)
% 3.22/3.38  [16]E(f3(f3(x161,x162),x163),f3(x161,f3(x162,x163)))
% 3.22/3.38  [18]P1(x181)+~P1(f2(x181))
% 3.22/3.38  [19]P1(x191)+~P1(f4(x191))
% 3.22/3.38  [20]~P2(x201,x202)+E(x201,x202)
% 3.22/3.38  [22]P1(x221)+~P2(x222,x221)
% 3.22/3.38  [23]P1(x231)+~P2(x231,x232)
% 3.22/3.38  [25]E(x251,x252)+P1(f5(x251,x252))
% 3.22/3.38  [27]E(f4(x271),f2(x272))+~P1(f3(x272,x271))
% 3.22/3.38  [28]P1(f2(x281))+~P1(f3(x281,x282))
% 3.22/3.38  [29]P1(f4(x291))+~P1(f3(x291,x292))
% 3.22/3.38  [21]~E(x211,x212)+~P1(x211)+P2(x211,x212)
% 3.22/3.38  [26]E(x261,x262)+E(f5(x261,x262),x262)+E(f5(x261,x262),x261)
% 3.22/3.38  [30]~E(f4(x302),f2(x301))+~P1(f2(x301))+P1(f3(x301,x302))
% 3.22/3.38  %EqnAxiom
% 3.22/3.38  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 3.22/3.38  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 3.22/3.38  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 3.22/3.38  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41),f2(x42))
% 3.22/3.38  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f4(x51),f4(x52))
% 3.22/3.38  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f3(x61,x63),f3(x62,x63))
% 3.22/3.38  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f3(x73,x71),f3(x73,x72))
% 3.22/3.38  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f5(x81,x83),f5(x82,x83))
% 3.22/3.38  [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f5(x93,x91),f5(x93,x92))
% 3.22/3.38  [10]~P1(x101)+P1(x102)+~E(x101,x102)
% 3.22/3.38  [11]P2(x112,x113)+~E(x111,x112)+~P2(x111,x113)
% 3.22/3.38  [12]P2(x123,x122)+~E(x121,x122)+~P2(x123,x121)
% 3.22/3.38  
% 3.22/3.38  %-------------------------------------------
% 3.22/3.38  cnf(34,plain,
% 3.22/3.38     (E(x341,f3(x341,f2(x341)))),
% 3.22/3.38     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,14,20,2])).
% 3.22/3.38  cnf(35,plain,
% 3.22/3.38     (~E(f2(a1),a1)),
% 3.22/3.38     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,14,20,2,4])).
% 3.22/3.38  cnf(36,plain,
% 3.22/3.38     (P1(a1)),
% 3.22/3.38     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,14,13,20,2,4,18])).
% 3.22/3.38  cnf(65,plain,
% 3.22/3.38     (P1(f3(f4(f2(a1)),f2(a1)))),
% 3.22/3.38     inference(scs_inference,[],[35,15,13,20,2,10])).
% 3.22/3.38  cnf(146,plain,
% 3.22/3.38     (E(f4(f2(a1)),f2(a1))),
% 3.22/3.38     inference(scs_inference,[],[36,34,10,27])).
% 3.22/3.38  cnf(149,plain,
% 3.22/3.38     (~E(f2(f2(a1)),f4(f2(a1)))),
% 3.22/3.38     inference(scs_inference,[],[36,17,34,10,27,2,3])).
% 3.22/3.38  cnf(284,plain,
% 3.22/3.38     (~P1(f3(f2(a1),f2(a1)))),
% 3.22/3.38     inference(scs_inference,[],[149,2,27])).
% 3.22/3.38  cnf(287,plain,
% 3.22/3.38     (~P2(x2871,f3(f2(a1),f2(a1)))),
% 3.22/3.38     inference(scs_inference,[],[284,23,22])).
% 3.22/3.38  cnf(373,plain,
% 3.22/3.38     ($false),
% 3.22/3.38     inference(scs_inference,[],[287,146,65,21,6]),
% 3.22/3.38     ['proof']).
% 3.22/3.38  % SZS output end Proof
% 3.22/3.38  % Total time :2.670000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------