↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : CAT013-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 04:40:15 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.50s 0.59s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.11  % Problem    : CAT013-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.02/0.11  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Tue Jun 18 12:45:38 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.53  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.48/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.59  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.48/0.59  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.48/0.59  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.48/0.59  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.48/0.59  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.48/0.59  
% 0.48/0.59  % Result      :Theorem 0.030000s
% 0.48/0.59  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.030000s
% 0.48/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.59  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.59  % File     : CAT013-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.50/0.59  % Domain   : Category Theory
% 0.50/0.59  % Problem  : domain(codomain(x)) = codomain(x)
% 0.50/0.59  % Version  : [Sco79] axioms : Reduced > Complete.
% 0.50/0.59  % English  :
% 0.50/0.59  
% 0.50/0.59  % Refs     : [Sco79] Scott (1979), Identity and Existence in Intuitionist L
% 0.50/0.59  % Source   : [ANL]
% 0.50/0.59  % Names    : p13.ver3.in [ANL]
% 0.50/0.59  
% 0.50/0.59  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.50/0.59  % Rating   : 0.05 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.5.0, 0.05 v7.4.0, 0.06 v7.3.0, 0.08 v7.1.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.4.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.10 v6.1.0, 0.14 v6.0.0, 0.10 v5.5.0, 0.20 v5.4.0, 0.15 v5.3.0, 0.11 v5.2.0, 0.12 v5.1.0, 0.06 v5.0.0, 0.00 v4.0.1, 0.09 v4.0.0, 0.00 v3.3.0, 0.07 v3.2.0, 0.08 v3.1.0, 0.09 v2.7.0, 0.08 v2.6.0, 0.00 v2.1.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.50/0.59  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (   5 unt;   2 nHn;  14 RR)
% 0.50/0.59  %            Number of literals    :   39 (  16 equ;  18 neg)
% 0.50/0.59  %            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
% 0.50/0.59  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.50/0.59  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.50/0.59  %            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.50/0.59  %            Number of variables   :   31 (   4 sgn)
% 0.50/0.59  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN
% 0.50/0.59  
% 0.50/0.59  % Comments : Axioms simplified by Art Quaife.
% 0.50/0.59  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.59  %----Include Scott's axioms for category theory
% 0.50/0.59  include('Axioms/CAT003-0.ax').
% 0.50/0.59  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(assume_codomain_exists,hypothesis,
% 0.50/0.59      there_exists(codomain(a)) ).
% 0.50/0.59  
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(prove_domain_of_codomain_is_codomain,negated_conjecture,
% 0.50/0.59      domain(codomain(a)) != codomain(a) ).
% 0.50/0.59  
% 0.50/0.59  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.59  % Proof found
% 0.50/0.59  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.50/0.59  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.50/0.59  %ClaNum:30(EqnAxiom:12)
% 0.50/0.59  %VarNum:58(SingletonVarNum:27)
% 0.50/0.59  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.50/0.59  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.50/0.59  %SharedTerms:5
% 0.50/0.59  %goalClause: 17
% 0.50/0.59  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.50/0.59  [13]P1(f2(a1))
% 0.50/0.59  [17]~E(f3(f2(a1)),f2(a1))
% 0.50/0.59  [14]E(f4(x141,f3(x141)),x141)
% 0.50/0.59  [15]E(f4(f2(x151),x151),x151)
% 0.50/0.59  [16]E(f4(f4(x161,x162),x163),f4(x161,f4(x162,x163)))
% 0.50/0.59  [18]P1(x181)+~P1(f3(x181))
% 0.50/0.59  [19]P1(x191)+~P1(f2(x191))
% 0.50/0.59  [20]~P2(x201,x202)+E(x201,x202)
% 0.50/0.59  [22]P1(x221)+~P2(x222,x221)
% 0.50/0.59  [23]P1(x231)+~P2(x231,x232)
% 0.50/0.59  [25]E(x251,x252)+P1(f5(x251,x252))
% 0.50/0.59  [27]E(f2(x271),f3(x272))+~P1(f4(x272,x271))
% 0.50/0.59  [28]P1(f3(x281))+~P1(f4(x281,x282))
% 0.50/0.59  [29]P1(f2(x291))+~P1(f4(x291,x292))
% 0.50/0.59  [21]~E(x211,x212)+~P1(x211)+P2(x211,x212)
% 0.50/0.59  [26]E(x261,x262)+E(f5(x261,x262),x262)+E(f5(x261,x262),x261)
% 0.50/0.59  [30]~E(f2(x302),f3(x301))+~P1(f3(x301))+P1(f4(x301,x302))
% 0.50/0.59  %EqnAxiom
% 0.50/0.59  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.50/0.59  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.50/0.59  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.50/0.59  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41),f2(x42))
% 0.50/0.59  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f3(x51),f3(x52))
% 0.50/0.59  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f4(x61,x63),f4(x62,x63))
% 0.50/0.59  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f4(x73,x71),f4(x73,x72))
% 0.50/0.59  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f5(x81,x83),f5(x82,x83))
% 0.50/0.59  [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f5(x93,x91),f5(x93,x92))
% 0.50/0.59  [10]~P1(x101)+P1(x102)+~E(x101,x102)
% 0.50/0.59  [11]P2(x112,x113)+~E(x111,x112)+~P2(x111,x113)
% 0.50/0.59  [12]P2(x123,x122)+~E(x121,x122)+~P2(x123,x121)
% 0.50/0.59  
% 0.50/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(34,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (E(x341,f4(x341,f3(x341)))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,14,20,2])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(35,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (P1(a1)),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,14,13,20,2,19])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(37,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (P2(f2(a1),f4(f2(a1),f3(f2(a1))))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,14,13,20,2,19,21])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(39,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (~E(f3(f2(a1)),f4(f2(f2(a1)),f2(a1)))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,14,15,13,20,2,19,21,3])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(44,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (~E(f2(a1),f3(f2(a1)))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,14,15,13,20,2,19,21,3,10,12,11])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(47,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (E(f4(x471,f4(x472,x473)),f4(f4(x471,x472),x473))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[39,16,20,2])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(48,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (P2(a1,f4(a1,f3(a1)))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[34,39,35,16,20,2,21])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(49,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (E(x491,f4(x491,f3(x491)))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(rename_variables,[],[34])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(53,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (~P1(f4(f4(x531,x532),x533))+P1(f4(x531,f4(x532,x533)))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[34,49,39,35,16,20,2,21,11,10])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(54,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (~P2(x541,f4(f4(x542,x543),x544))+P1(f4(x542,f4(x543,x544)))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[34,49,39,35,16,20,2,21,11,10,22])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(62,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (E(x621,f4(f2(x621),x621))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,44,20,2])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(63,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (P1(f4(f2(f2(a1)),f2(a1)))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,13,44,20,2,10])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(64,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (P2(a1,f4(f2(a1),a1))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[62,35,21])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(65,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (E(x651,f4(f2(x651),x651))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(rename_variables,[],[62])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(69,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (~P1(f4(x691,f4(x692,x693)))+P1(f4(f4(x691,x692),x693))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[62,65,47,48,35,21,11,10])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(71,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (~P2(x711,f4(x712,f4(x713,x714)))+P1(f4(f4(x712,x713),x714))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[62,65,47,48,35,21,11,10,53,22])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(73,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (~P2(f4(x731,f4(x732,x733)),x734)+P1(f4(f4(x731,x732),x733))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[62,65,47,48,35,21,11,10,53,22,23])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(79,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (~P1(f3(f4(f2(a1),a1)))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[44,18,27])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(94,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (~P2(x941,f4(f4(f2(a1),a1),x942))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[37,79,63,28,69,71,73,22,23,21,11,54])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(102,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     (~P2(x1021,f4(f4(f2(a1),a1),x1022))),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(rename_variables,[],[94])).
% 0.50/0.59  cnf(104,plain,
% 0.50/0.59     ($false),
% 0.50/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[34,64,94,102,35,21,12]),
% 0.50/0.60     ['proof']).
% 0.50/0.60  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.50/0.60  % Total time :0.030000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------