↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : CAT014-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:14:09 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.43s
% Output   : Proof 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   24 (  14 unt;   0 nHn;  22 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   36 (  28 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(domain_of_codomain_is_codomain,axiom,
    domain(codomain(X)) = codomain(X),
    file('CAT002-0.ax',domain_of_codomain_is_codomain) ).

cnf(codomain_composition,axiom,
    compose(X,codomain(X)) = X,
    file('CAT002-0.ax',codomain_composition) ).

cnf(codomain_domain2,axiom,
    ( codomain(compose(X,Y)) = codomain(Y)
    | codomain(X) != domain(Y) ),
    file('CAT002-0.ax',codomain_domain2) ).

cnf(prove_codomain_is_idempotent,negated_conjecture,
    codomain(codomain(a)) != codomain(a),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_codomain_is_idempotent) ).

cnf(equality_2,axiom,
    ( Eq_x_1 = Eq_x_0
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
    theory(equality,[symmetry]) ).

cnf(equality_3,axiom,
    ( Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
    theory(equality,[transitivity]) ).

cnf(equality_5,axiom,
    ( codomain(Eq_x_0) = codomain(Eq_y_0)
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_functions]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    codomain(codomain(a)) != codomain(a),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[prove_codomain_is_idempotent]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( codomain(a) != codomain(codomain(a))
    | codomain(codomain(a)) = codomain(a) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[equality_2]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    ( codomain(compose(a,codomain(a))) != codomain(codomain(a))
    | codomain(a) != codomain(compose(a,codomain(a)))
    | codomain(a) = codomain(codomain(a)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[equality_3]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    ( a != compose(a,codomain(a))
    | codomain(a) = codomain(compose(a,codomain(a))) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:2)],[equality_5]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t4:2]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    ( compose(a,codomain(a)) != a
    | a = compose(a,codomain(a)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t6:2)],[equality_2]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t6:2]) ).

cnf(t10,plain,
    compose(a,codomain(a)) = a,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t8:2)],[codomain_composition]) ).

cnf(t11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t10:1)],[t10:1,t8:2]) ).

cnf(t12,plain,
    ( codomain(a) != domain(codomain(a))
    | codomain(compose(a,codomain(a))) = codomain(codomain(a)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:3)],[codomain_domain2]) ).

cnf(t13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t12:1)],[t12:1,t4:3]) ).

cnf(t14,plain,
    ( domain(codomain(a)) != codomain(a)
    | codomain(a) = domain(codomain(a)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t12:2)],[equality_2]) ).

cnf(t15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t14:1)],[t14:1,t12:2]) ).

cnf(t16,plain,
    domain(codomain(a)) = codomain(a),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t14:2)],[domain_of_codomain_is_codomain]) ).

cnf(t17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t16:1)],[t16:1,t14:2]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CAT014-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_PEQ_NUE problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.40  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.40  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 14:04:25 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.43  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.43  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------