↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : CAT014-4 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.4WEpWdyLxF true

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:30:00 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.78s
% Output   : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : CAT014-4 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.4WEpWdyLxF true
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 10:43:53 EDT 2025
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.36  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.15/0.36  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.36  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.15/0.37  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.15/0.37  % Running in FO mode
% 0.53/0.67  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.53/0.67  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.53/0.67  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.56/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.78  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.56/0.78  % BCE start: 13
% 0.56/0.78  % BCE eliminated: 1
% 0.56/0.78  % PE start: 12
% 0.56/0.78  logic: eq
% 0.56/0.78  % PE eliminated: 2
% 0.56/0.78  % done 24 iterations in 0.014s
% 0.56/0.78  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.56/0.78  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.56/0.78  thf(compose_type, type, compose: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(domain_type, type, domain: $i > $i).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(there_exists_type, type, there_exists: $i > $o).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(codomain_type, type, codomain: $i > $i).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(compose_codomain, axiom, (( compose @ ( codomain @ X ) @ X ) = ( X ))).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 0.56/0.78      (![X0 : $i]: ((compose @ (codomain @ X0) @ X0) = (X0))),
% 0.56/0.78      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [compose_codomain])).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(domain_codomain_composition1, axiom,
% 0.56/0.78    (( ~( there_exists @ ( compose @ X @ Y ) ) ) | 
% 0.56/0.78     ( ( domain @ X ) = ( codomain @ Y ) ))).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.56/0.78      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.78         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.56/0.78          | ((domain @ X0) = (codomain @ X1)))),
% 0.56/0.78      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [domain_codomain_composition1])).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl49, plain,
% 0.56/0.78      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.78         (~ (there_exists @ X0)
% 0.56/0.78          | ((domain @ (codomain @ X0)) = (codomain @ X0)))),
% 0.56/0.78      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl49, plain,
% 0.56/0.78      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.78         (~ (there_exists @ X0)
% 0.56/0.78          | ((domain @ (codomain @ X0)) = (codomain @ X0)))),
% 0.56/0.78      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(compose_domain, axiom, (( compose @ X @ ( domain @ X ) ) = ( X ))).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 0.56/0.78      (![X0 : $i]: ((compose @ X0 @ (domain @ X0)) = (X0))),
% 0.56/0.78      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [compose_domain])).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.56/0.78      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.78         (~ (there_exists @ (compose @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.56/0.78          | ((domain @ X0) = (codomain @ X1)))),
% 0.56/0.78      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [domain_codomain_composition1])).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl48, plain,
% 0.56/0.78      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.78         (~ (there_exists @ X0) | ((domain @ X0) = (codomain @ (domain @ X0))))),
% 0.56/0.78      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl72, plain,
% 0.56/0.78      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.78         (((domain @ (codomain @ X0)) = (codomain @ (codomain @ X0)))
% 0.56/0.78          | ~ (there_exists @ X0)
% 0.56/0.78          | ~ (there_exists @ (codomain @ X0)))),
% 0.56/0.78      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl49, zip_derived_cl48])).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(codomain_has_elements, axiom,
% 0.56/0.78    (( ~( there_exists @ ( codomain @ X ) ) ) | ( there_exists @ X ))).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.56/0.78      (![X0 : $i]: (~ (there_exists @ (codomain @ X0)) |  (there_exists @ X0))),
% 0.56/0.78      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [codomain_has_elements])).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl94, plain,
% 0.56/0.78      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.78         (~ (there_exists @ (codomain @ X0))
% 0.56/0.78          | ((domain @ (codomain @ X0)) = (codomain @ (codomain @ X0))))),
% 0.56/0.78      inference('clc', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl72, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(prove_codomain_is_idempotent, conjecture,
% 0.56/0.78    (( codomain @ ( codomain @ a ) ) = ( codomain @ a ))).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.56/0.78    (( codomain @ ( codomain @ a ) ) != ( codomain @ a )),
% 0.56/0.78    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_codomain_is_idempotent])).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 0.56/0.78      (((codomain @ (codomain @ a)) != (codomain @ a))),
% 0.56/0.78      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl103, plain,
% 0.56/0.78      ((((domain @ (codomain @ a)) != (codomain @ a))
% 0.56/0.78        | ~ (there_exists @ (codomain @ a)))),
% 0.56/0.78      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl94, zip_derived_cl12])).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(assume_codomain_exists, axiom, (there_exists @ ( codomain @ a ))).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain, ( (there_exists @ (codomain @ a))),
% 0.56/0.78      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [assume_codomain_exists])).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl111, plain,
% 0.56/0.78      (((domain @ (codomain @ a)) != (codomain @ a))),
% 0.56/0.78      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl103, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl112, plain,
% 0.56/0.78      ((((codomain @ a) != (codomain @ a)) | ~ (there_exists @ a))),
% 0.56/0.78      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl49, zip_derived_cl111])).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.56/0.78      (![X0 : $i]: (~ (there_exists @ (codomain @ X0)) |  (there_exists @ X0))),
% 0.56/0.78      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [codomain_has_elements])).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain, ( (there_exists @ (codomain @ a))),
% 0.56/0.78      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [assume_codomain_exists])).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl44, plain, ( (there_exists @ a)),
% 0.56/0.78      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl113, plain, (((codomain @ a) != (codomain @ a))),
% 0.56/0.78      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl112, zip_derived_cl44])).
% 0.56/0.78  thf(zip_derived_cl114, plain, ($false),
% 0.56/0.78      inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl113])).
% 0.56/0.78  
% 0.56/0.78  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.56/0.78  
% 0.56/0.78  
% 0.56/0.78  % Terminating...
% 0.65/0.89  % Runner terminated.
% 0.65/0.91  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------