↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : CAT017-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:55:59 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.02s 0.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   27 (  16   ~;  11   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   5 sgn   7   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(existence_and_equality_implies_equivalence1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( equivalent(VAR_0,VAR_1)
      | VAR_0 != VAR_1
      | ~ there_exists(VAR_0) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',existence_and_equality_implies_equivalence1) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    ( equivalent(A,B)
    | A != B
    | ~ there_exists(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[existence_and_equality_implies_equivalence1]) ).

fof(equivalence_implies_existence3,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( there_exists(VAR_1)
      | ~ equivalent(VAR_0,VAR_1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',equivalence_implies_existence3) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    ( there_exists(B)
    | ~ equivalent(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[equivalence_implies_existence3]) ).

cnf(c_6,plain,
    ( B != A
    | ~ there_exists(B)
    | there_exists(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_1]) ).

fof(prove_codomain_of_a_exists,axiom,
    ~ there_exists(codomain(a)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_codomain_of_a_exists) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    ~ there_exists(codomain(a)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_codomain_of_a_exists]) ).

fof(assume_a_exists,axiom,
    there_exists(a),
    file('theBenchmark.p',assume_a_exists) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    there_exists(a),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[assume_a_exists]) ).

fof(composition_implies_codomain,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( there_exists(codomain(VAR_0))
      | ~ there_exists(compose(VAR_0,VAR_1)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',composition_implies_codomain) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    ( there_exists(codomain(A))
    | ~ there_exists(compose(A,B)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[composition_implies_codomain]) ).

fof(compose_domain,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : compose(VAR_0,domain(VAR_0)) = VAR_0,
    file('theBenchmark.p',compose_domain) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    compose(A,domain(A)) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[compose_domain]) ).

cnf(c_26,plain,
    ( a != A
    | there_exists(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_6]) ).

cnf(c_32,plain,
    ~ there_exists(compose(a,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_7]) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    a != compose(a,A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_26,c_32]) ).

cnf(c_48,plain,
    compose(a,A) != a,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_48,c_16]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : CAT017-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.55  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.55  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.55  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.55  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.55  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.55  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.55  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.55  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 22:52:09 UTC 2026
% 0.02/0.56  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.02/0.56  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.02/0.56  % Process 1621239 was started by sandbox on n018,
% 0.02/0.56  % Sat Sep 26 22:52:09 2026
% 0.02/0.56  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.02/0.56  
% 0.02/0.56  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.02/0.57  
% 0.02/0.57  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.02/0.57  
% 0.02/0.57  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.02/0.57  % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.02/0.57  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.02/0.57  % Maximum clause weight is 7.000.
% 0.02/0.57  % Given clauses 18.
% 0.02/0.57  
% 0.02/0.57  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------