↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : CAT017-4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 04:40:17 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.68s 0.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : CAT017-4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Jun 18 12:06:54 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.58  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.59/0.72  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.72  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.59/0.72  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.59/0.72  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.59/0.72  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.59/0.72  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.59/0.72  
% 0.59/0.72  % Result      :Theorem 0.110000s
% 0.59/0.72  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.110000s
% 0.59/0.72  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.72  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.59/0.72  % File     : CAT017-4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.59/0.72  % Domain   : Category Theory
% 0.68/0.72  % Problem  : If x exists, then codomain(x) exists
% 0.68/0.72  % Version  : [Sco79] axioms : Reduced > Complete.
% 0.68/0.72  % English  :
% 0.68/0.72  
% 0.68/0.72  % Refs     : [Sco79] Scott (1979), Identity and Existence in Intuitionist L
% 0.68/0.72  % Source   : [TPTP]
% 0.68/0.72  % Names    :
% 0.68/0.72  
% 0.68/0.72  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.68/0.72  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.06 v5.4.0, 0.07 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.68/0.72  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;  10 RR)
% 0.68/0.72  %            Number of literals    :   23 (   7 equ;  11 neg)
% 0.68/0.72  %            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.68/0.72  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.68/0.72  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.68/0.72  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.68/0.72  %            Number of variables   :   19 (   2 sgn)
% 0.68/0.72  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN
% 0.68/0.72  
% 0.68/0.72  % Comments : The dependent axioms have been removed.
% 0.68/0.72  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.68/0.72  %----Include Scott's axioms for category theory
% 0.68/0.72  include('Axioms/CAT004-0.ax').
% 0.68/0.72  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.68/0.72  cnf(assume_a_exists,hypothesis,
% 0.68/0.72      there_exists(a) ).
% 0.68/0.72  
% 0.68/0.72  cnf(prove_codomain_of_a_exists,negated_conjecture,
% 0.68/0.72      ~ there_exists(codomain(a)) ).
% 0.68/0.72  
% 0.68/0.72  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.68/0.72  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.68/0.72  % Proof found
% 0.68/0.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.68/0.72  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.68/0.72  %ClaNum:23(EqnAxiom:10)
% 0.68/0.72  %VarNum:40(SingletonVarNum:19)
% 0.68/0.72  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.68/0.73  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.68/0.73  %SharedTerms:4
% 0.68/0.73  %goalClause: 15
% 0.68/0.73  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.68/0.73  [11]P1(a1)
% 0.68/0.73  [15]~P1(f4(a1))
% 0.68/0.73  [12]E(f3(x121,f2(x121)),x121)
% 0.68/0.73  [13]E(f3(f4(x131),x131),x131)
% 0.68/0.73  [14]E(f3(f3(x141,x142),x143),f3(x141,f3(x142,x143)))
% 0.68/0.73  [16]P1(x161)+~P1(f2(x161))
% 0.68/0.73  [17]P1(x171)+~P1(f4(x171))
% 0.68/0.73  [18]~P2(x181,x182)+E(x181,x182)
% 0.68/0.73  [20]P1(x201)+~P2(x201,x202)
% 0.68/0.73  [21]E(f4(x211),f2(x212))+~P1(f3(x212,x211))
% 0.68/0.73  [22]P1(f2(x221))+~P1(f3(x221,x222))
% 0.68/0.73  [19]~E(x191,x192)+~P1(x191)+P2(x191,x192)
% 0.68/0.73  [23]~E(f4(x232),f2(x231))+~P1(f2(x231))+P1(f3(x231,x232))
% 0.68/0.73  %EqnAxiom
% 0.68/0.73  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.68/0.73  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.68/0.73  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.68/0.73  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41),f2(x42))
% 0.68/0.73  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f3(x51,x53),f3(x52,x53))
% 0.68/0.73  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f3(x63,x61),f3(x63,x62))
% 0.68/0.73  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f4(x71),f4(x72))
% 0.68/0.73  [8]~P1(x81)+P1(x82)+~E(x81,x82)
% 0.68/0.73  [9]P2(x92,x93)+~E(x91,x92)+~P2(x91,x93)
% 0.68/0.73  [10]P2(x103,x102)+~E(x101,x102)+~P2(x103,x101)
% 0.68/0.73  
% 0.68/0.73  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.68/0.73  cnf(27,plain,
% 0.68/0.73     (E(x271,f3(x271,f2(x271)))),
% 0.68/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,12,20,2])).
% 0.68/0.73  cnf(28,plain,
% 0.68/0.73     (~P1(f3(f4(a1),f2(f4(a1))))),
% 0.68/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,12,20,2,8])).
% 0.68/0.73  cnf(29,plain,
% 0.68/0.73     (E(f3(x291,f2(x291)),x291)),
% 0.68/0.73     inference(rename_variables,[],[12])).
% 0.68/0.73  cnf(30,plain,
% 0.68/0.73     (P2(a1,x301)+~E(a1,x301)),
% 0.68/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,11,12,20,2,8,19])).
% 0.68/0.73  cnf(35,plain,
% 0.68/0.73     (~E(a1,f3(f4(a1),f2(f4(a1))))),
% 0.68/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,11,12,29,20,2,8,19,9,10,18,23,3])).
% 0.68/0.73  cnf(46,plain,
% 0.68/0.73     (E(x461,f3(f4(x461),x461))),
% 0.68/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[28,27,35,13,30,20,18,2])).
% 0.68/0.73  cnf(102,plain,
% 0.68/0.73     (P1(f3(f4(a1),a1))),
% 0.68/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[11,46,8])).
% 0.68/0.73  cnf(106,plain,
% 0.68/0.73     (E(f2(f4(a1)),f4(a1))),
% 0.68/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[11,46,8,21,2])).
% 0.68/0.73  cnf(112,plain,
% 0.68/0.73     ($false),
% 0.68/0.73     inference(scs_inference,[],[15,102,106,8,22]),
% 0.68/0.73     ['proof']).
% 0.68/0.73  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.68/0.73  % Total time :0.110000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------