↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : CAT019-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.I0nEtvUdAi true

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:30:01 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.57s 0.77s
% Output   : Refutation 0.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.14  % Problem  : CAT019-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.15/0.15  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.I0nEtvUdAi true
% 0.16/0.37  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 10:44:53 EDT 2025
% 0.23/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/0.37  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.23/0.37  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.37  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.23/0.37  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.23/0.38  % Running in FO mode
% 0.53/0.65  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.53/0.65  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.53/0.65  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.56/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.57/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.57/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.57/0.77  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.57/0.77  % BCE start: 21
% 0.57/0.77  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.57/0.77  % PE start: 21
% 0.57/0.77  logic: eq
% 0.57/0.77  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.57/0.77  % done 1 iterations in 0.008s
% 0.57/0.77  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.57/0.77  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.57/0.77  thf(c1_type, type, c1: $i).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(c2_type, type, c2: $i).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(equality_to_c1_and_c2_2, axiom,
% 0.57/0.77    (( ( c2 ) = ( Z ) ) | ( ( c1 ) != ( Z ) ))).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (((c2) = (X0)) | ((c1) != (X0)))),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [equality_to_c1_and_c2_2])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl115, plain, (((c2) = (c1))),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl19])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(prove_c1_equals_c2, conjecture, (( c2 ) = ( c1 ))).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( c2 ) != ( c1 )),
% 0.57/0.77    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_c1_equals_c2])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain, (((c2) != (c1))),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.57/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl116, plain, ($false),
% 0.57/0.77      inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 0.57/0.77                [zip_derived_cl115, zip_derived_cl20])).
% 0.57/0.77  
% 0.57/0.77  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.57/0.77  
% 0.57/0.77  
% 0.57/0.77  % Terminating...
% 1.56/0.87  % Runner terminated.
% 1.56/0.88  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------