↑ Up

lazyCoP---0.1.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem  : CAT019-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:03:29 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 131.66s 17.15s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : CAT019-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun May 29 19:52:56 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 131.66/17.15  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 131.66/17.15  % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c0, axiom,
% 131.66/17.15  	a != b).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c1, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	a != b,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 131.66/17.15  
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c2, axiom,
% 131.66/17.15  	X0 = X1 | there_exists(f1(X0,X1))).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(a0, assumption,
% 131.66/17.15  	b = X1).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c3, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	$false,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(variable_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c4, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	there_exists(f1(X0,X1)),
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(variable_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c5, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	X0 != X2 | a != X2,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(variable_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 131.66/17.15  
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(a1, assumption,
% 131.66/17.15  	X0 = X2).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c6, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	a != X2,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a1])], [c5])).
% 131.66/17.15  
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(a2, assumption,
% 131.66/17.15  	a = X2).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c7, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	$false,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a2])], [c6])).
% 131.66/17.15  
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c8, axiom,
% 131.66/17.15  	X3 = X4 | f1(X3,X4) = X4 | f1(X3,X4) = X3).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(a3, assumption,
% 131.66/17.15  	f1(X0,X1) = f1(X3,X4)).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c9, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	$false,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c4, c8])).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c10, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	X3 = X4 | f1(X3,X4) = X4,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c4, c8])).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c11, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	X5 != X3 | there_exists(X5),
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c4, c8])).
% 131.66/17.15  
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(a4, assumption,
% 131.66/17.15  	X5 = X3).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c12, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	there_exists(X5),
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a4])], [c11])).
% 131.66/17.15  
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c13, axiom,
% 131.66/17.15  	a = b | ~there_exists(a)).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(a5, assumption,
% 131.66/17.15  	X5 = a).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c14, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	$false,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a5])], [c12, c13])).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c15, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	a = b,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a5])], [c12, c13])).
% 131.66/17.15  
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c16, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	a != b).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(a6, assumption,
% 131.66/17.15  	b = b).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(a7, assumption,
% 131.66/17.15  	a = X6).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c17, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	$false,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(subterm_reduction, [assumptions([a6, a7])], [c15, c16])).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c18, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	a != X6,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(subterm_reduction, [assumptions([a6, a7])], [c15, c16])).
% 131.66/17.15  
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(a8, assumption,
% 131.66/17.15  	a = X6).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c19, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	$false,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a8])], [c18])).
% 131.66/17.15  
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c20, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	a != b).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(a9, assumption,
% 131.66/17.15  	b = X4).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c21, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	f1(X3,X4) = X4,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(subterm_reduction, [assumptions([a9])], [c10, c20])).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c22, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	a != X3,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(subterm_reduction, [assumptions([a9])], [c10, c20])).
% 131.66/17.15  
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(a10, assumption,
% 131.66/17.15  	a = X3).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c23, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	$false,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a10])], [c22])).
% 131.66/17.15  
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c24, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	there_exists(f1(X0,X1))).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(a11, assumption,
% 131.66/17.15  	f1(X0,X1) = f1(X3,X4)).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c25, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	$false,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(subterm_reduction, [assumptions([a11])], [c21, c24])).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c26, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	there_exists(X4),
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(subterm_reduction, [assumptions([a11])], [c21, c24])).
% 131.66/17.15  
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c27, axiom,
% 131.66/17.15  	a = b | ~there_exists(b)).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(a12, assumption,
% 131.66/17.15  	X4 = b).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c28, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	$false,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a12])], [c26, c27])).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c29, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	a = b,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a12])], [c26, c27])).
% 131.66/17.15  
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c30, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	a != b).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(a13, assumption,
% 131.66/17.15  	b = b).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(a14, assumption,
% 131.66/17.15  	a = X7).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c31, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	$false,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(subterm_reduction, [assumptions([a13, a14])], [c29, c30])).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c32, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	a != X7,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(subterm_reduction, [assumptions([a13, a14])], [c29, c30])).
% 131.66/17.15  
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(a15, assumption,
% 131.66/17.15  	a = X7).
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c33, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	$false,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a15])], [c32])).
% 131.66/17.15  
% 131.66/17.15  cnf(c34, plain,
% 131.66/17.15  	$false,
% 131.66/17.15  	inference(constraint_solving, [
% 131.66/17.15  		bind(X0, a),
% 131.66/17.15  		bind(X1, b),
% 131.66/17.15  		bind(X2, a),
% 131.66/17.15  		bind(X3, a),
% 131.66/17.15  		bind(X4, b),
% 131.66/17.15  		bind(X5, a),
% 131.66/17.15  		bind(X6, a),
% 131.66/17.15  		bind(X7, a)
% 131.66/17.15  	],
% 131.66/17.15  	[a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10, a11, a12, a13, a14, a15])).
% 131.66/17.15  
% 131.66/17.15  % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------