%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CAT033+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 14 23:59:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 9.33s 6.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.33s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 11 unt; 5 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 54 ( 5 equ; 31 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_904,plain,
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
| m2_cat_1(k24_ens_1(X1,X2,X3),X2,k12_ens_1(X1))
| ~ l1_cat_1(X2)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_cat_1(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nn5pzan7/lgb.p',i_0_904) ).
cnf(i_0_3535,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk635_0,u1_cat_1(esk634_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nn5pzan7/lgb.p',i_0_3535) ).
cnf(i_0_3537,negated_conjecture,
v2_cat_1(esk634_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nn5pzan7/lgb.p',i_0_3537) ).
cnf(i_0_3536,negated_conjecture,
l1_cat_1(esk634_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nn5pzan7/lgb.p',i_0_3536) ).
cnf(i_0_355,plain,
( k12_ens_1(k17_ens_1(X1)) = k1_yoneda_1(X1)
| ~ l1_cat_1(X1)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nn5pzan7/lgb.p',i_0_355) ).
cnf(i_0_1300,plain,
( ~ l1_cat_1(X1)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X1)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(k17_ens_1(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nn5pzan7/lgb.p',i_0_1300) ).
cnf(i_0_399,plain,
( k24_ens_1(X1,X2,X3) = k20_ens_1(X2,X3)
| v1_xboole_0(X1)
| ~ l1_cat_1(X2)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_cat_1(X2))
| ~ r1_tarski(k17_ens_1(X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nn5pzan7/lgb.p',i_0_399) ).
cnf(i_0_1642,plain,
r1_tarski(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nn5pzan7/lgb.p',i_0_1642) ).
cnf(i_0_3534,negated_conjecture,
~ m2_cat_1(k20_ens_1(esk634_0,esk635_0),esk634_0,k1_yoneda_1(esk634_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nn5pzan7/lgb.p',i_0_3534) ).
cnf(c_0_3547,plain,
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
| m2_cat_1(k24_ens_1(X1,X2,X3),X2,k12_ens_1(X1))
| ~ l1_cat_1(X2)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_cat_1(X2)) ),
i_0_904 ).
cnf(c_0_3548,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk635_0,u1_cat_1(esk634_0)),
i_0_3535 ).
cnf(c_0_3549,negated_conjecture,
v2_cat_1(esk634_0),
i_0_3537 ).
cnf(c_0_3550,negated_conjecture,
l1_cat_1(esk634_0),
i_0_3536 ).
cnf(c_0_3551,negated_conjecture,
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
| m2_cat_1(k24_ens_1(X1,esk634_0,esk635_0),esk634_0,k12_ens_1(X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3547,c_0_3548]),c_0_3549]),c_0_3550])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3552,plain,
( k12_ens_1(k17_ens_1(X1)) = k1_yoneda_1(X1)
| ~ l1_cat_1(X1)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X1) ),
i_0_355 ).
cnf(c_0_3553,plain,
( ~ l1_cat_1(X1)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X1)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(k17_ens_1(X1)) ),
i_0_1300 ).
cnf(c_0_3554,plain,
( k24_ens_1(X1,X2,X3) = k20_ens_1(X2,X3)
| v1_xboole_0(X1)
| ~ l1_cat_1(X2)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_cat_1(X2))
| ~ r1_tarski(k17_ens_1(X2),X1) ),
i_0_399 ).
cnf(c_0_3555,plain,
r1_tarski(X1,X1),
i_0_1642 ).
cnf(c_0_3556,plain,
( m2_cat_1(k24_ens_1(k17_ens_1(X1),esk634_0,esk635_0),esk634_0,k1_yoneda_1(X1))
| ~ v2_cat_1(X1)
| ~ l1_cat_1(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3551,c_0_3552]),c_0_3553]) ).
cnf(c_0_3557,plain,
( k24_ens_1(k17_ens_1(X1),X1,X2) = k20_ens_1(X1,X2)
| ~ v2_cat_1(X1)
| ~ l1_cat_1(X1)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_cat_1(X1)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3554,c_0_3555]),c_0_3553]) ).
cnf(c_0_3558,negated_conjecture,
~ m2_cat_1(k20_ens_1(esk634_0,esk635_0),esk634_0,k1_yoneda_1(esk634_0)),
i_0_3534 ).
cnf(c_0_3559,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3556,c_0_3557]),c_0_3549]),c_0_3550]),c_0_3548])]),c_0_3558]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CAT033+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 29 15:48:47 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 1.73/1.98 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.73/1.98 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 1.73/1.98 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 1.73/1.98 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 9.33/6.38 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 9.33/6.38 # No SInE strategy applied
% 9.33/6.38 # Trying AutoSched0 for 148 seconds
% 9.33/6.38 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 9.33/6.38 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 9.33/6.38 #
% 9.33/6.38 # Preprocessing time : 0.025 s
% 9.33/6.38 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 9.33/6.38
% 9.33/6.38 # Proof found!
% 9.33/6.38 # SZS status Theorem
% 9.33/6.38 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.33/6.38 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.33/6.38
% 9.33/6.38 # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.33/6.38 # User time : 0.036 s
% 9.33/6.38 # System time : 0.006 s
% 9.33/6.38 # Total time : 0.042 s
% 9.33/6.38 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 9.33/6.38
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------