%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : COL001-2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YMXTytYgww true
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:30:06 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.89s
% Output : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14 % Problem : COL001-2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.15 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YMXTytYgww true
% 0.16/0.36 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 10:59:23 EDT 2025
% 0.16/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.37 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.16/0.37 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.37 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.16/0.37 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.16/0.37 % Running in FO mode
% 0.57/0.65 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.57/0.65 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.57/0.65 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.59/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.60/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.60/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.60/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.60/0.81 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.60/0.89 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.60/0.89 % BCE start: 6
% 0.60/0.89 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.60/0.89 % PE start: 6
% 0.60/0.89 logic: eq
% 0.60/0.89 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.60/0.89 % done 23 iterations in 0.130s
% 0.60/0.89 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.60/0.89 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.60/0.89 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.60/0.89 thf(s_type, type, s: $i).
% 0.60/0.89 thf(apply_type, type, apply: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.60/0.89 thf(combinator_type, type, combinator: $i).
% 0.60/0.89 thf(i_type, type, i: $i).
% 0.60/0.89 thf(i_definition, axiom, (( apply @ i @ X ) = ( X ))).
% 0.60/0.89 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ((apply @ i @ X0) = (X0))),
% 0.60/0.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [i_definition])).
% 0.60/0.89 thf(s_definition, axiom,
% 0.60/0.89 (( apply @ ( apply @ ( apply @ s @ X ) @ Y ) @ Z ) =
% 0.60/0.89 ( apply @ ( apply @ X @ Z ) @ ( apply @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 0.60/0.89 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.60/0.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.89 ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ s @ X0) @ X2) @ X1)
% 0.60/0.89 = (apply @ (apply @ X0 @ X1) @ (apply @ X2 @ X1)))),
% 0.60/0.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [s_definition])).
% 0.60/0.89 thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain,
% 0.60/0.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.89 ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ s @ X1) @ i) @ X0)
% 0.60/0.89 = (apply @ (apply @ X1 @ X0) @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.89 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.60/0.89 thf(b_definition, axiom,
% 0.60/0.89 (( apply @ ( apply @ ( apply @ b @ X ) @ Y ) @ Z ) =
% 0.60/0.89 ( apply @ X @ ( apply @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 0.60/0.89 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.60/0.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.89 ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X0) @ X1) @ X2)
% 0.60/0.89 = (apply @ X0 @ (apply @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 0.60/0.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [b_definition])).
% 0.60/0.89 thf(zip_derived_cl49, plain,
% 0.60/0.89 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.89 ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ s @ (apply @ b @ X1)) @ i) @ X0)
% 0.60/0.89 = (apply @ X1 @ (apply @ X0 @ X0)))),
% 0.60/0.89 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl16, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.60/0.89 thf(prove_fixed_point, conjecture, (( Y ) = ( apply @ combinator @ Y ))).
% 0.60/0.89 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( Y ) != ( apply @ combinator @ Y )),
% 0.60/0.89 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_fixed_point])).
% 0.60/0.89 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.60/0.89 (![X0 : $i]: ((X0) != (apply @ combinator @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.89 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.60/0.89 thf(zip_derived_cl376, plain,
% 0.60/0.89 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.89 ((apply @ X0 @ X0)
% 0.60/0.89 != (apply @ (apply @ (apply @ s @ (apply @ b @ combinator)) @ i) @
% 0.60/0.89 X0))),
% 0.60/0.89 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl49, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.60/0.89 thf(zip_derived_cl421, plain, ($false),
% 0.60/0.89 inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl376])).
% 0.60/0.89
% 0.60/0.89 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.60/0.89
% 0.60/0.89
% 0.60/0.89 % Terminating...
% 0.65/0.98 % Runner terminated.
% 0.65/0.99 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------