%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : COL003-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:09:15 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 157.46s 32.24s
% Output : CNFRefutation 157.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 17 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 17 ( 16 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 11 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_strong_fixed_point,negated_conjecture,
apply(X1,f(X1)) != apply(f(X1),apply(X1,f(X1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_strong_fixed_point) ).
cnf(w_definition,axiom,
apply(apply(w,X1),X2) = apply(apply(X1,X2),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',w_definition) ).
cnf(b_definition,axiom,
apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_definition) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
apply(X1,f(X1)) != apply(f(X1),apply(X1,f(X1))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_strong_fixed_point]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
apply(apply(w,X1),X2) = apply(apply(X1,X2),X2),
w_definition ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
b_definition ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
apply(X1,f(X1)) != apply(f(X1),apply(X1,f(X1))),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
apply(apply(w,apply(b,X1)),X2) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
apply(f(apply(apply(b,X1),X2)),apply(X1,apply(X2,f(apply(apply(b,X1),X2))))) != apply(X1,apply(X2,f(apply(apply(b,X1),X2)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
apply(apply(w,w),X1) = apply(apply(X1,X1),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
apply(apply(apply(w,apply(b,apply(b,X1))),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(apply(X2,X2),X3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
apply(f(apply(apply(b,X1),apply(apply(b,X2),X3))),apply(X1,apply(X2,apply(X3,f(apply(apply(b,X1),apply(apply(b,X2),X3))))))) != apply(X1,apply(X2,apply(X3,f(apply(apply(b,X1),apply(apply(b,X2),X3)))))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
apply(apply(apply(w,w),b),X1) = apply(b,apply(b,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
apply(apply(w,apply(w,apply(b,apply(b,X1)))),X2) = apply(X1,apply(apply(w,w),X2)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]),c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
apply(f(apply(apply(b,X1),apply(apply(b,X2),apply(apply(w,w),b)))),apply(X1,apply(X2,apply(b,apply(b,f(apply(apply(b,X1),apply(apply(b,X2),apply(apply(w,w),b))))))))) != apply(X1,apply(X2,apply(b,apply(b,f(apply(apply(b,X1),apply(apply(b,X2),apply(apply(w,w),b)))))))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
apply(X1,apply(apply(w,w),apply(w,apply(b,apply(b,X1))))) = apply(apply(w,w),apply(w,apply(b,apply(b,X1)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : COL003-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.45 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.45 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:05:44 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.28/0.54 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.28/0.54 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 157.46/32.24 % Version: 3.5.1
% 157.46/32.24 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 157.46/32.24 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 157.46/32.24 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 157.46/32.24 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 157.46/32.24 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 157.46/32.24 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 157.46/32.24 % new_bool_3 with pid 2085720 completed with status 9
% 157.46/32.24 % new_bool_1 with pid 2085721 completed with status 9
% 157.46/32.24 % sh5l with pid 2085728 completed with status 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Result found by sh5l
% 157.46/32.24 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 157.46/32.24 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 157.46/32.24 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 157.46/32.24 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 157.46/32.24 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 157.46/32.24 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 157.46/32.24 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 157.46/32.24 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 157.46/32.24 % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 157.46/32.24 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 157.46/32.24 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 157.46/32.24 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2085730 completed with status 8
% 157.46/32.24 % Starting sh5l with 31s (1) cores
% 157.46/32.24 % sh5l with pid 2085909 completed with status 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Result found by sh5l
% 157.46/32.24 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 157.46/32.24 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 157.46/32.24 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 157.46/32.24 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 157.46/32.24 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 157.46/32.24 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 157.46/32.24 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 157.46/32.24 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 157.46/32.24 % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 157.46/32.24 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 157.46/32.24 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 157.46/32.24 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2085730 completed with status 8
% 157.46/32.24 % Starting sh5l with 31s (1) cores
% 157.46/32.24 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 157.46/32.24 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 157.46/32.24
% 157.46/32.24 % Proof found!
% 157.46/32.24 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 157.46/32.24 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 157.46/32.24 % Parsed axioms : 3
% 157.46/32.24 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Initial clauses : 3
% 157.46/32.24 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 157.46/32.24 % Processed clauses : 1422
% 157.46/32.24 % ...of these trivial : 118
% 157.46/32.24 % ...subsumed : 976
% 157.46/32.24 % ...remaining for further processing : 328
% 157.46/32.24 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 157.46/32.24 % Backward-rewritten : 23
% 157.46/32.24 % Generated clauses : 64836
% 157.46/32.24 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 63158
% 157.46/32.24 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Paramodulations : 64836
% 157.46/32.24 % Factorizations : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % NegExts : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Total rewrite steps : 112691
% 157.46/32.24 % ...of those cached : 90530
% 157.46/32.24 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Propositional check models : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 157.46/32.24 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 157.46/32.24 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 157.46/32.24 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 157.46/32.24 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 157.46/32.24 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 157.46/32.24 % Current number of processed clauses : 301
% 157.46/32.24 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 105
% 157.46/32.24 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 67
% 157.46/32.24 % Negative unit clauses : 129
% 157.46/32.24 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 61636
% 157.46/32.24 % ...number of literals in the above : 61636
% 157.46/32.24 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Current number of archived clauses : 27
% 157.46/32.24 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4852
% 157.46/32.24 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % BW rewrite match attempts : 15554
% 157.46/32.24 % BW rewrite match successes : 367
% 157.46/32.24 % Condensation attempts : 1422
% 157.46/32.24 % Condensation successes : 0
% 157.46/32.24 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3373647
% 157.46/32.24 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 157.46/32.24
% 157.46/32.24 % -------------------------------------------------
% 157.46/32.24 % User time : 30.376 s
% 157.46/32.24 % System time : 0.827 s
% 157.46/32.24 % Total time : 31.203 s
% 157.46/32.24 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 157.46/32.24
% 157.46/32.24 % -------------------------------------------------
% 157.46/32.24 % User time : 30.423 s
% 157.46/32.24 % System time : 0.876 s
% 157.46/32.24 % Total time : 31.299 s
% 157.46/32.24 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 157.46/32.24 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------