%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : COL003-14 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:09:15 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 8 ( 7 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(b_definition,axiom,
apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_definition) ).
cnf(prove_strong_fixed_point,negated_conjecture,
apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt) != apply(fixed_pt,apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_strong_fixed_point) ).
cnf(c_0_2,axiom,
apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
b_definition ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt) != apply(fixed_pt,apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_strong_fixed_point]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
apply(apply(w,w),apply(w,apply(b,apply(b,X1)))) = apply(strong_fixed_point,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt) != apply(fixed_pt,apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt)),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
apply(X1,apply(strong_fixed_point,X1)) = apply(strong_fixed_point,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : COL003-14 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.38 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:05:30 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.48 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.48 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.48 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2085292 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.12/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.48 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.48 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.48 % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.48 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.48 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y_ni with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.48 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y_ni with pid 2085299 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y_ni
% 0.12/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.48 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.48 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.48 % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.48 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.48 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y_ni with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.48 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.48 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.48
% 0.12/0.48 % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.48 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.48 % Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.12/0.48 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Initial clauses : 4
% 0.12/0.48 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.12/0.48 % Processed clauses : 163
% 0.12/0.48 % ...of these trivial : 49
% 0.12/0.48 % ...subsumed : 51
% 0.12/0.48 % ...remaining for further processing : 63
% 0.12/0.48 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.12/0.48 % Generated clauses : 3291
% 0.12/0.48 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3159
% 0.12/0.48 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Paramodulations : 3291
% 0.12/0.48 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % NegExts : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Total rewrite steps : 1022
% 0.12/0.48 % ...of those cached : 596
% 0.12/0.48 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.48 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.48 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.48 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.48 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.48 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.48 % Current number of processed clauses : 53
% 0.12/0.48 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 33
% 0.12/0.48 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 20
% 0.12/0.48 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3004
% 0.12/0.48 % ...number of literals in the above : 3004
% 0.12/0.48 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Current number of archived clauses : 10
% 0.12/0.48 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 132
% 0.12/0.48 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % BW rewrite match attempts : 8236
% 0.12/0.48 % BW rewrite match successes : 48
% 0.12/0.48 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/0.48 % Termbank termtop insertions : 85529
% 0.12/0.48 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.12/0.48
% 0.12/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.48 % User time : 0.034 s
% 0.12/0.48 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.12/0.48 % Total time : 0.039 s
% 0.12/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.12/0.48
% 0.12/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.48 % User time : 0.136 s
% 0.12/0.48 % System time : 0.022 s
% 0.12/0.48 % Total time : 0.158 s
% 0.12/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.12/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------