%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : COL003-15 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:09:15 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.76s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.76s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 16 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 16 ( 15 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(w_definition,axiom,
apply(apply(w,X1),X2) = apply(apply(X1,X2),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',w_definition) ).
cnf(b_definition,axiom,
apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_definition) ).
cnf(strong_fixed_point,axiom,
strong_fixed_point = apply(apply(b,apply(apply(b,apply(w,w)),w)),apply(apply(b,b),b)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',strong_fixed_point) ).
cnf(prove_strong_fixed_point,negated_conjecture,
apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt) != apply(fixed_pt,apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_strong_fixed_point) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
apply(apply(w,X1),X2) = apply(apply(X1,X2),X2),
w_definition ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
b_definition ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
apply(apply(w,apply(b,X1)),X2) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
apply(apply(apply(w,apply(b,apply(b,X1))),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(apply(X2,X2),X3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
apply(apply(w,w),X1) = apply(apply(X1,X1),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
strong_fixed_point = apply(apply(b,apply(apply(b,apply(w,w)),w)),apply(apply(b,b),b)),
strong_fixed_point ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt) != apply(fixed_pt,apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_strong_fixed_point]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
apply(apply(w,apply(w,apply(b,apply(b,X1)))),X2) = apply(X1,apply(apply(w,w),X2)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
apply(apply(w,w),apply(w,apply(b,apply(b,X1)))) = apply(strong_fixed_point,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_9]),c_0_5]),c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt) != apply(fixed_pt,apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt)),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
apply(X1,apply(strong_fixed_point,X1)) = apply(strong_fixed_point,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : COL003-15 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.43 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.43 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.43 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.43 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:03:42 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.44 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.76/0.63 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.76/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.76/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.76/0.63 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.76/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.63 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.63 % sh5l with pid 1050417 completed with status 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.76/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.76/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.76/0.63 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.76/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.63 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.76/0.63 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.76/0.63 % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.76/0.63 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.76/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.63 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1050423 completed with status 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.76/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.76/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.76/0.63 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.76/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.63 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.76/0.63 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.76/0.63 % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.76/0.63 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.76/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.76/0.63 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.76/0.63
% 0.76/0.63 % Proof found!
% 0.76/0.63 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.76/0.63 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.76/0.63 % Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.76/0.63 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Initial clauses : 4
% 0.76/0.63 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.76/0.63 % Processed clauses : 145
% 0.76/0.63 % ...of these trivial : 25
% 0.76/0.63 % ...subsumed : 67
% 0.76/0.63 % ...remaining for further processing : 53
% 0.76/0.63 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Backward-rewritten : 7
% 0.76/0.63 % Generated clauses : 4737
% 0.76/0.63 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4624
% 0.76/0.63 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Paramodulations : 4737
% 0.76/0.63 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % NegExts : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Total rewrite steps : 904
% 0.76/0.63 % ...of those cached : 505
% 0.76/0.63 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.76/0.63 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.76/0.63 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.76/0.63 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.76/0.63 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.76/0.63 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.76/0.63 % Current number of processed clauses : 46
% 0.76/0.63 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 16
% 0.76/0.63 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 30
% 0.76/0.63 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4470
% 0.76/0.63 % ...number of literals in the above : 4470
% 0.76/0.63 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Current number of archived clauses : 7
% 0.76/0.63 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 85
% 0.76/0.63 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % BW rewrite match attempts : 837
% 0.76/0.63 % BW rewrite match successes : 41
% 0.76/0.63 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.76/0.63 % Termbank termtop insertions : 113966
% 0.76/0.63 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.76/0.63
% 0.76/0.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.76/0.63 % User time : 0.113 s
% 0.76/0.63 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.76/0.63 % Total time : 0.123 s
% 0.76/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.76/0.63
% 0.76/0.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.76/0.63 % User time : 0.114 s
% 0.76/0.63 % System time : 0.014 s
% 0.76/0.63 % Total time : 0.128 s
% 0.76/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.76/0.63 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------