↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : COL003-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:02:30 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.79s 1.32s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  27 unt;   6 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   65 (  28 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   13 (  10   ~;   3   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   7 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn  24   !;   0   ?;  18   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : apply(apply(apply(b,X0),X1),X2) = apply(X0,apply(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_definition) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : apply(apply(w,X0),X1) = apply(apply(X0,X1),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',w_definition) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( fixed_point(X0)
      | apply(X0,fixed_pt) != apply(fixed_pt,apply(X0,fixed_pt)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',strong_fixed_point) ).

fof(f4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ fixed_point(apply(apply(b,apply(w,w)),apply(apply(b,apply(apply(b,w),b)),b))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_strong_fixed_point) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : apply(apply(apply(b,X0),X1),X2) = apply(X0,apply(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : apply(apply(X0,X1),X1) = apply(apply(w,X0),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( fixed_point(X0)
      | ( apply(fixed_pt,apply(X0,fixed_pt)) != apply(X0,fixed_pt) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
    ~ fixed_point(apply(apply(b,apply(w,w)),apply(apply(b,apply(apply(b,w),b)),b))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_77,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( apply(fixed_pt,apply(X0,fixed_pt)) != apply(X0,fixed_pt) )
      | ( apply(apply(b,apply(w,w)),apply(apply(b,apply(apply(b,w),b)),b)) != X0 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_78,plain,
    apply(fixed_pt,apply(apply(apply(b,apply(w,w)),apply(apply(b,apply(apply(b,w),b)),b)),fixed_pt)) != apply(apply(apply(b,apply(w,w)),apply(apply(b,apply(apply(b,w),b)),b)),fixed_pt),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_77]) ).

tcf(c_89,plain,
    apply(fixed_pt,apply(apply(w,w),apply(w,apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt))))) != apply(apply(w,w),apply(w,apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt)))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_93,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = apply(w,w),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_94,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = apply(b,fixed_pt),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_95,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = apply(b,iPr_def_11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_96,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = apply(w,iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_97,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = apply(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_98,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = apply(fixed_pt,iPr_def_14),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_99,plain,
    iPr_def_15 != iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_89,c_94,c_95,c_96,c_93,c_97,c_98]) ).

tcf(c_143,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : apply(apply(iPr_def_12,X0),X0) = apply(iPr_def_13,X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_147,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : apply(apply(X0,X0),X0) = apply(apply(w,w),X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_148,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : apply(apply(X0,X0),X0) = apply(iPr_def_10,X0),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_147,c_93]) ).

tcf(c_151,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : apply(apply(iPr_def_11,X0),X1) = apply(fixed_pt,apply(X0,X1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_94,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_152,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : apply(apply(iPr_def_12,X0),X1) = apply(iPr_def_11,apply(X0,X1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_95,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_165,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : apply(iPr_def_11,apply(X0,X0)) = apply(iPr_def_13,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_143,c_152]) ).

tcf(c_180,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : apply(fixed_pt,apply(apply(X0,X0),X1)) = apply(apply(iPr_def_13,X0),X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_165,c_151]) ).

tcf(c_400,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : apply(apply(iPr_def_13,X0),X0) = apply(fixed_pt,apply(iPr_def_10,X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_148,c_180]) ).

tcf(c_443,plain,
    apply(fixed_pt,apply(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_13)) = apply(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_13),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_400,c_148]) ).

tcf(c_446,plain,
    iPr_def_14 = iPr_def_15,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_443,c_97,c_98]) ).

tcf(c_451,plain,
    iPr_def_14 != iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_446]) ).

tcf(c_452,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_451]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : COL003-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.38  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 07:07:09 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.39  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.44  
% 0.12/0.44  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.12/0.44  
% 0.12/0.44  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.12/0.45  % Proving...
% 3.79/1.32  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.79/1.32  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.79/1.32  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.79/1.32  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  % ------ Preprocessing...% ------  preprocesses with Option_UEQ
% 3.79/1.32   gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.79/1.32  % ------ Proving...
% 3.79/1.32  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  % 
% 3.79/1.32  % clauses                               9
% 3.79/1.32  % conjectures                           0
% 3.79/1.32  % EPR                                   1
% 3.79/1.32  % Horn                                  9
% 3.79/1.32  % unary                                 9
% 3.79/1.32  % binary                                0
% 3.79/1.32  % lits                                  9
% 3.79/1.32  % lits eq                               9
% 3.79/1.32  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.79/1.32  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.79/1.32  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.79/1.32  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 3.79/1.32  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  % ------ Schedule UEQ
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  % ------ Option_UEQ Time Limit: 10.
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  % ------ 
% 3.79/1.32  % Current options:
% 3.79/1.32  % ------ 
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  % 
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  % ------ Proving...
% 3.79/1.32  % 
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.79/1.32  
% 3.79/1.32  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------