%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : COL009-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:09:18 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 13.69s 3.28s
% Output : CNFRefutation 13.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 1
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 2 ( 2 unt; 0 nHn; 2 RR)
% Number of literals : 2 ( 1 equ; 1 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_0,negated_conjecture,
apply(apply(l2,apply(apply(b,apply(b,combinator)),X1)),apply(l2,X2)) != apply(apply(X1,apply(apply(b,apply(b,combinator)),X1)),apply(X2,X2)) ).
cnf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_0]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : COL009-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.41 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.41 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.41 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.41 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.41 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.41 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:06:17 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.42 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.42 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 13.69/3.28 % Version: 3.5.1
% 13.69/3.28 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 13.69/3.28 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 13.69/3.28 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 13.69/3.28 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 13.69/3.28 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 13.69/3.28 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 13.69/3.28 % new_bool_3 with pid 298198 completed with status 9
% 13.69/3.28 % new_bool_1 with pid 298199 completed with status 9
% 13.69/3.28 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 298197 completed with status 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 13.69/3.28 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 13.69/3.28 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 13.69/3.28 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 13.69/3.28 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 13.69/3.28 % No SInE strategy applied
% 13.69/3.28 % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 13.69/3.28 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 13.69/3.28 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 13.69/3.28 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 13.69/3.28 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y_ni with 136s (1) cores
% 13.69/3.28 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 13.69/3.28 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 13.69/3.28 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y_ni with pid 298203 completed with status 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y_ni
% 13.69/3.28 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 13.69/3.28 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 13.69/3.28 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 13.69/3.28 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 13.69/3.28 % No SInE strategy applied
% 13.69/3.28 % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 13.69/3.28 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 13.69/3.28 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 13.69/3.28 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 13.69/3.28 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y_ni with 136s (1) cores
% 13.69/3.28 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 13.69/3.28 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 13.69/3.28
% 13.69/3.28 % Proof found!
% 13.69/3.28 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 13.69/3.28 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 13.69/3.28 % Parsed axioms : 3
% 13.69/3.28 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Initial clauses : 3
% 13.69/3.28 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 13.69/3.28 % Processed clauses : 2976
% 13.69/3.28 % ...of these trivial : 124
% 13.69/3.28 % ...subsumed : 2557
% 13.69/3.28 % ...remaining for further processing : 295
% 13.69/3.28 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Backward-subsumed : 14
% 13.69/3.28 % Backward-rewritten : 58
% 13.69/3.28 % Generated clauses : 57046
% 13.69/3.28 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 54340
% 13.69/3.28 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Paramodulations : 57045
% 13.69/3.28 % Factorizations : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % NegExts : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 13.69/3.28 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Total rewrite steps : 78923
% 13.69/3.28 % ...of those cached : 64748
% 13.69/3.28 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Propositional check models : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 13.69/3.28 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 13.69/3.28 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 13.69/3.28 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 13.69/3.28 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 13.69/3.28 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 13.69/3.28 % Current number of processed clauses : 220
% 13.69/3.28 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 51
% 13.69/3.28 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 31
% 13.69/3.28 % Negative unit clauses : 138
% 13.69/3.28 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 51370
% 13.69/3.28 % ...number of literals in the above : 51370
% 13.69/3.28 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Current number of archived clauses : 75
% 13.69/3.28 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5912
% 13.69/3.28 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % BW rewrite match attempts : 48345
% 13.69/3.28 % BW rewrite match successes : 189
% 13.69/3.28 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Condensation successes : 0
% 13.69/3.28 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1914114
% 13.69/3.28 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 13.69/3.28
% 13.69/3.28 % -------------------------------------------------
% 13.69/3.28 % User time : 2.613 s
% 13.69/3.28 % System time : 0.079 s
% 13.69/3.28 % Total time : 2.693 s
% 13.69/3.28 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 13.69/3.28
% 13.69/3.28 % -------------------------------------------------
% 13.69/3.28 % User time : 13.141 s
% 13.69/3.28 % System time : 0.502 s
% 13.69/3.28 % Total time : 13.643 s
% 13.69/3.28 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 13.69/3.28 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------