%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : COL011-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:09:18 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 151.29s 30.86s
% Output : CNFRefutation 151.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Derivation
% Derivation depth : 0
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 1 ( 1 unt; 0 nHn; 1 RR)
% Number of literals : 1 ( 0 equ; 0 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of predicates : 1 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-0 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_0,negated_conjecture,
$false,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : COL011-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:04:49 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 151.29/30.86 % Version: 3.5.1
% 151.29/30.86 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 151.29/30.86 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 151.29/30.86 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 151.29/30.86 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 151.29/30.86 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 151.29/30.86 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 151.29/30.86 % new_bool_1 with pid 3677455 completed with status 9
% 151.29/30.86 % new_bool_3 with pid 3677454 completed with status 9
% 151.29/30.86 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 3677453 completed with status 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 151.29/30.86 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 151.29/30.86 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 151.29/30.86 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 151.29/30.86 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 151.29/30.86 % No SInE strategy applied
% 151.29/30.86 % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 151.29/30.86 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 151.29/30.86 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 151.29/30.86 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 151.29/30.86 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y_ni with 136s (1) cores
% 151.29/30.86 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 151.29/30.86 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 151.29/30.86 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y_ni with pid 3677460 completed with status 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y_ni
% 151.29/30.86 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 151.29/30.86 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 151.29/30.86 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 151.29/30.86 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 151.29/30.86 % No SInE strategy applied
% 151.29/30.86 % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 151.29/30.86 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 151.29/30.86 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 151.29/30.86 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 151.29/30.86 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y_ni with 136s (1) cores
% 151.29/30.86 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 151.29/30.86 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 151.29/30.86
% 151.29/30.86 % Proof found!
% 151.29/30.86 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 151.29/30.86 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 151.29/30.86 % Parsed axioms : 3
% 151.29/30.86 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Initial clauses : 3
% 151.29/30.86 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 151.29/30.86 % Processed clauses : 5551
% 151.29/30.86 % ...of these trivial : 181
% 151.29/30.86 % ...subsumed : 4055
% 151.29/30.86 % ...remaining for further processing : 1315
% 151.29/30.86 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Backward-subsumed : 99
% 151.29/30.86 % Backward-rewritten : 84
% 151.29/30.86 % Generated clauses : 460981
% 151.29/30.86 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 455730
% 151.29/30.86 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Paramodulations : 460981
% 151.29/30.86 % Factorizations : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % NegExts : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Total rewrite steps : 295918
% 151.29/30.86 % ...of those cached : 241784
% 151.29/30.86 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Propositional check models : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 151.29/30.86 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 151.29/30.86 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 151.29/30.86 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 151.29/30.86 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 151.29/30.86 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 151.29/30.86 % Current number of processed clauses : 1129
% 151.29/30.86 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 189
% 151.29/30.86 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 84
% 151.29/30.86 % Negative unit clauses : 856
% 151.29/30.86 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 448623
% 151.29/30.86 % ...number of literals in the above : 448623
% 151.29/30.86 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Current number of archived clauses : 186
% 151.29/30.86 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 144944
% 151.29/30.86 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % BW rewrite match attempts : 952801
% 151.29/30.86 % BW rewrite match successes : 360
% 151.29/30.86 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Condensation successes : 0
% 151.29/30.86 % Termbank termtop insertions : 27527545
% 151.29/30.86 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 151.29/30.86
% 151.29/30.86 % -------------------------------------------------
% 151.29/30.86 % User time : 29.436 s
% 151.29/30.86 % System time : 0.648 s
% 151.29/30.86 % Total time : 30.083 s
% 151.29/30.86 % Maximum resident set size: 3576 pages
% 151.29/30.86
% 151.29/30.86 % -------------------------------------------------
% 151.29/30.86 % User time : 147.699 s
% 151.29/30.86 % System time : 3.453 s
% 151.29/30.86 % Total time : 151.152 s
% 151.29/30.86 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 151.29/30.86 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------