↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : COL019-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.M9VjwzxkiR true

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:30:11 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.91s
% Output   : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : COL019-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.M9VjwzxkiR true
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 10:53:53 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36  % Running in FO mode
% 0.57/0.71  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.57/0.71  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.57/0.71  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.59/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.59/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.59/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.59/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.60/0.91  % Solved by fo/fo13.sh.
% 0.60/0.91  % done 22 iterations in 0.068s
% 0.60/0.91  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.60/0.91  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.60/0.91  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.60/0.91  thf(combinator_type, type, combinator: $i).
% 0.60/0.91  thf(t_type, type, t: $i).
% 0.60/0.91  thf(s_type, type, s: $i).
% 0.60/0.91  thf(apply_type, type, apply: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.60/0.91  thf(t_definition, axiom,
% 0.60/0.91    (( apply @ ( apply @ t @ X ) @ Y ) = ( apply @ Y @ X ))).
% 0.60/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.60/0.91      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.91         ((apply @ (apply @ t @ X1) @ X0) = (apply @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.60/0.91      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [t_definition])).
% 0.60/0.91  thf(s_definition, axiom,
% 0.60/0.91    (( apply @ ( apply @ ( apply @ s @ X ) @ Y ) @ Z ) =
% 0.60/0.91     ( apply @ ( apply @ X @ Z ) @ ( apply @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 0.60/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.60/0.91      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.91         ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ s @ X0) @ X2) @ X1)
% 0.60/0.91           = (apply @ (apply @ X0 @ X1) @ (apply @ X2 @ X1)))),
% 0.60/0.91      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [s_definition])).
% 0.60/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain,
% 0.60/0.91      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.91         ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ s @ t) @ X1) @ X0)
% 0.60/0.91           = (apply @ (apply @ X1 @ X0) @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.91      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.60/0.91  thf(b_definition, axiom,
% 0.60/0.91    (( apply @ ( apply @ ( apply @ b @ X ) @ Y ) @ Z ) =
% 0.60/0.91     ( apply @ X @ ( apply @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 0.60/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.60/0.91      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.91         ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X0) @ X1) @ X2)
% 0.60/0.91           = (apply @ X0 @ (apply @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 0.60/0.91      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [b_definition])).
% 0.60/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain,
% 0.60/0.91      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.91         ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ s @ t) @ (apply @ b @ X1)) @ X0)
% 0.60/0.91           = (apply @ X1 @ (apply @ X0 @ X0)))),
% 0.60/0.91      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl16, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 0.60/0.91  thf(prove_fixed_point, conjecture, (( Y ) = ( apply @ combinator @ Y ))).
% 0.60/0.91  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( Y ) != ( apply @ combinator @ Y )),
% 0.60/0.91    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_fixed_point])).
% 0.60/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.60/0.91      (![X0 : $i]: ((X0) != (apply @ combinator @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.91      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.60/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl171, plain,
% 0.60/0.91      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.91         ((apply @ X0 @ X0)
% 0.60/0.91           != (apply @ (apply @ (apply @ s @ t) @ (apply @ b @ combinator)) @ 
% 0.60/0.91               X0))),
% 0.60/0.91      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl25, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.60/0.91  thf(zip_derived_cl215, plain, ($false),
% 0.60/0.91      inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl171])).
% 0.60/0.91  
% 0.60/0.91  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.60/0.91  
% 0.60/0.91  
% 0.60/0.91  % Terminating...
% 0.63/1.00  % Runner terminated.
% 0.63/1.01  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------