↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : COL023-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WkbZhQmtvM true

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:30:11 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.00s 1.27s
% Output   : Refutation 4.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.16  % Problem  : COL023-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.17  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WkbZhQmtvM true
% 0.14/0.40  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.40  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.40  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.40  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 10:55:53 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.40  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.40  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.40  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.40  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.41  % Running in FO mode
% 0.38/0.74  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.38/0.74  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.38/0.74  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.38/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.38/0.81  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.38/0.83  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.38/0.83  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.38/0.84  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.38/0.85  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.38/0.87  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 4.00/1.27  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 4.00/1.27  % BCE start: 3
% 4.00/1.27  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 4.00/1.27  % PE start: 3
% 4.00/1.27  logic: eq
% 4.00/1.27  % PE eliminated: 0
% 4.00/1.27  % done 43 iterations in 0.458s
% 4.00/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 4.00/1.27  % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.00/1.27  thf(n_type, type, n: $i).
% 4.00/1.27  thf(combinator_type, type, combinator: $i).
% 4.00/1.27  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 4.00/1.27  thf(apply_type, type, apply: $i > $i > $i).
% 4.00/1.27  thf(b_definition, axiom,
% 4.00/1.27    (( apply @ ( apply @ ( apply @ b @ X ) @ Y ) @ Z ) =
% 4.00/1.27     ( apply @ X @ ( apply @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 4.00/1.27  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 4.00/1.27      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 4.00/1.27         ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X0) @ X1) @ X2)
% 4.00/1.27           = (apply @ X0 @ (apply @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 4.00/1.27      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [b_definition])).
% 4.00/1.27  thf(n_definition, axiom,
% 4.00/1.27    (( apply @ ( apply @ ( apply @ n @ X ) @ Y ) @ Z ) =
% 4.00/1.27     ( apply @ ( apply @ ( apply @ X @ Z ) @ Y ) @ Z ))).
% 4.00/1.27  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 4.00/1.27      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 4.00/1.27         ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ n @ X0) @ X2) @ X1)
% 4.00/1.27           = (apply @ (apply @ (apply @ X0 @ X1) @ X2) @ X1))),
% 4.00/1.27      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [n_definition])).
% 4.00/1.27  thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 4.00/1.27      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 4.00/1.27         ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ n @ (apply @ b @ X2)) @ X0) @ X1)
% 4.00/1.27           = (apply @ (apply @ X2 @ (apply @ X1 @ X0)) @ X1))),
% 4.00/1.27      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 4.00/1.27  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 4.00/1.27      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 4.00/1.27         ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X0) @ X1) @ X2)
% 4.00/1.27           = (apply @ X0 @ (apply @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 4.00/1.27      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [b_definition])).
% 4.00/1.27  thf(zip_derived_cl196, plain,
% 4.00/1.27      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 4.00/1.27         ((apply @ 
% 4.00/1.27           (apply @ (apply @ n @ (apply @ b @ (apply @ b @ X2))) @ X1) @ X0)
% 4.00/1.27           = (apply @ X2 @ (apply @ (apply @ X0 @ X1) @ X0)))),
% 4.00/1.27      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl12, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 4.00/1.27  thf(prove_fixed_point, conjecture, (( Y ) = ( apply @ combinator @ Y ))).
% 4.00/1.27  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( Y ) != ( apply @ combinator @ Y )),
% 4.00/1.27    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_fixed_point])).
% 4.00/1.27  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 4.00/1.27      (![X0 : $i]: ((X0) != (apply @ combinator @ X0))),
% 4.00/1.27      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 4.00/1.27  thf(zip_derived_cl1142, plain,
% 4.00/1.27      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 4.00/1.27         ((apply @ (apply @ X0 @ X1) @ X0)
% 4.00/1.27           != (apply @ 
% 4.00/1.27               (apply @ (apply @ n @ (apply @ b @ (apply @ b @ combinator))) @ 
% 4.00/1.27                X1) @ 
% 4.00/1.27               X0))),
% 4.00/1.27      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl196, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 4.00/1.27  thf(zip_derived_cl1290, plain, ($false),
% 4.00/1.27      inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1142])).
% 4.00/1.27  
% 4.00/1.27  % SZS output end Refutation
% 4.00/1.27  
% 4.00/1.27  
% 4.00/1.27  % Terminating...
% 4.00/1.34  % Runner terminated.
% 4.00/1.35  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------