↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : COL027-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Ir5ogxwsFq true

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:30:12 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 5.82s 1.40s
% Output   : Refutation 5.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.10  % Problem  : COL027-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.10/0.11  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Ir5ogxwsFq true
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 10:56:38 EDT 2025
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.32  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.11/0.32  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.33  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.11/0.33  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.11/0.33  % Running in FO mode
% 0.18/0.58  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.18/0.58  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.18/0.58  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.85/0.65  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.85/0.66  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.85/0.67  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.85/0.68  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.85/0.68  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.85/0.69  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.85/0.69  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 5.82/1.40  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 5.82/1.40  % BCE start: 3
% 5.82/1.40  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 5.82/1.40  % PE start: 3
% 5.82/1.40  logic: eq
% 5.82/1.40  % PE eliminated: 0
% 5.82/1.40  % done 76 iterations in 0.730s
% 5.82/1.40  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 5.82/1.40  % SZS output start Refutation
% 5.82/1.40  thf(h_type, type, h: $i).
% 5.82/1.40  thf(combinator_type, type, combinator: $i).
% 5.82/1.40  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 5.82/1.40  thf(apply_type, type, apply: $i > $i > $i).
% 5.82/1.40  thf(b_definition, axiom,
% 5.82/1.40    (( apply @ ( apply @ ( apply @ b @ X ) @ Y ) @ Z ) =
% 5.82/1.40     ( apply @ X @ ( apply @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 5.82/1.40  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 5.82/1.40      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 5.82/1.40         ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X0) @ X1) @ X2)
% 5.82/1.40           = (apply @ X0 @ (apply @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 5.82/1.40      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [b_definition])).
% 5.82/1.40  thf(h_definition, axiom,
% 5.82/1.40    (( apply @ ( apply @ ( apply @ h @ X ) @ Y ) @ Z ) =
% 5.82/1.40     ( apply @ ( apply @ ( apply @ X @ Y ) @ Z ) @ Y ))).
% 5.82/1.40  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 5.82/1.40      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 5.82/1.40         ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ h @ X0) @ X1) @ X2)
% 5.82/1.40           = (apply @ (apply @ (apply @ X0 @ X1) @ X2) @ X1))),
% 5.82/1.41      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [h_definition])).
% 5.82/1.41  thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 5.82/1.41      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 5.82/1.41         ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ h @ (apply @ b @ X2)) @ X1) @ X0)
% 5.82/1.41           = (apply @ (apply @ X2 @ (apply @ X1 @ X0)) @ X1))),
% 5.82/1.41      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 5.82/1.41  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 5.82/1.41      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 5.82/1.41         ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X0) @ X1) @ X2)
% 5.82/1.41           = (apply @ X0 @ (apply @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 5.82/1.41      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [b_definition])).
% 5.82/1.41  thf(zip_derived_cl348, plain,
% 5.82/1.41      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 5.82/1.41         ((apply @ 
% 5.82/1.41           (apply @ (apply @ h @ (apply @ b @ (apply @ b @ X2))) @ X1) @ X0)
% 5.82/1.41           = (apply @ X2 @ (apply @ (apply @ X1 @ X0) @ X1)))),
% 5.82/1.41      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl12, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 5.82/1.41  thf(prove_fixed_point, conjecture, (( Y ) = ( apply @ combinator @ Y ))).
% 5.82/1.41  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (( Y ) != ( apply @ combinator @ Y )),
% 5.82/1.41    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_fixed_point])).
% 5.82/1.41  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 5.82/1.41      (![X0 : $i]: ((X0) != (apply @ combinator @ X0))),
% 5.82/1.41      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 5.82/1.41  thf(zip_derived_cl1501, plain,
% 5.82/1.41      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 5.82/1.41         ((apply @ (apply @ X1 @ X0) @ X1)
% 5.82/1.41           != (apply @ 
% 5.82/1.41               (apply @ (apply @ h @ (apply @ b @ (apply @ b @ combinator))) @ 
% 5.82/1.41                X1) @ 
% 5.82/1.41               X0))),
% 5.82/1.41      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl348, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 5.82/1.41  thf(zip_derived_cl1773, plain, ($false),
% 5.82/1.41      inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1501])).
% 5.82/1.41  
% 5.82/1.41  % SZS output end Refutation
% 5.82/1.41  
% 5.82/1.41  
% 5.82/1.41  % Terminating...
% 6.45/1.49  % Runner terminated.
% 6.45/1.50  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------