%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : COL042-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n023.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:24:39 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 4.79s 1.00s % Output : CNFRefutation 4.79s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : COL042-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0. % 0.03/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue May 31 14:31:41 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.20/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.20/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.20/0.36 # % 0.20/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.20/0.36 # Number of axioms: 4 Number of unprocessed: 4 % 0.20/0.36 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.20/0.36 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.20/0.36 # Hello from C++ % 0.20/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.20/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.20/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.20/0.37 # 4 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.20/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.20/0.37 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.20/0.37 # Found 3 unit axioms. % 0.20/0.37 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.20/0.37 # 1 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.20/0.37 # 3 unit axiom clauses % 0.20/0.37 % 0.20/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.20/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.20/0.37 # Creating equality axioms % 0.20/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 0.20/0.37 # Returning from population with 9 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.20/0.37 # We now have 9 tableaux to operate on % 4.79/1.00 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 4.79/1.00 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 4.79/1.00 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 4.79/1.00 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 4.79/1.00 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 4.79/1.00 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 4.79/1.00 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 4.79/1.00 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 4.79/1.00 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.79/1.00 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.79/1.00 # Begin clausification derivation % 4.79/1.00 % 4.79/1.00 # End clausification derivation % 4.79/1.00 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 4.79/1.00 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3)=apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)))). % 4.79/1.00 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (apply(apply(w1,X1),X2)=apply(apply(X2,X1),X1))). % 4.79/1.00 cnf(i_0_8, negated_conjecture, (~fixed_point(apply(apply(b,apply(apply(b,apply(apply(b,apply(w1,w1)),apply(b,w1))),b)),b)))). % 4.79/1.00 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (fixed_point(X1)|apply(fixed_pt,apply(X1,fixed_pt))!=apply(X1,fixed_pt))). % 4.79/1.00 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (X4=X4)). % 4.79/1.00 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 4.79/1.00 # Begin printing tableau % 4.79/1.00 # Found 5 steps % 4.79/1.00 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (apply(apply(w1,X10),X9)=apply(apply(X9,X10),X10)), inference(start_rule)). % 4.79/1.00 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (apply(apply(w1,X10),X9)=apply(apply(X9,X10),X10)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])). % 4.79/1.00 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (apply(apply(X9,X10),X10)=apply(apply(w1,X10),X9)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_17])). % 4.79/1.00 cnf(i_0_51, plain, (apply(apply(w1,X10),X9)!=apply(apply(X9,X10),X10)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])). % 4.79/1.00 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (apply(apply(X9,X10),X10)=apply(apply(X9,X10),X10)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_49, ...])). % 4.79/1.00 # End printing tableau % 4.79/1.00 # SZS output end % 4.79/1.00 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 4.79/1.00 # Child (8153) has found a proof. % 4.79/1.00 % 4.79/1.00 # Proof search is over... % 4.79/1.00 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------