↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : COL044-9 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:09:25 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 110.79s 16.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 110.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   24 (  24 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   24 (  23 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(n_definition,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(n,X1),X2),X3) = apply(apply(apply(X1,X3),X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_definition) ).

cnf(b_definition,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_definition) ).

cnf(strong_fixed_point,axiom,
    strong_fixed_point = apply(apply(b,apply(apply(b,apply(apply(n,apply(n,apply(apply(b,apply(b,b)),apply(n,apply(n,apply(b,b)))))),n)),b)),b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',strong_fixed_point) ).

cnf(prove_strong_fixed_point,negated_conjecture,
    apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt) != apply(fixed_pt,apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_strong_fixed_point) ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(n,X1),X2),X3) = apply(apply(apply(X1,X3),X2),X3),
    n_definition ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
    b_definition ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    strong_fixed_point = apply(apply(b,apply(apply(b,apply(apply(n,apply(n,apply(apply(b,apply(b,b)),apply(n,apply(n,apply(b,b)))))),n)),b)),b),
    strong_fixed_point ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(n,apply(X1,X2)),X2),X3) = apply(apply(apply(n,apply(n,X1)),X2),X3),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_4]),c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(n,apply(apply(b,X1),X2)),X3),X4) = apply(apply(apply(X1,apply(X2,X4)),X3),X4),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(n,apply(n,apply(apply(b,apply(b,b)),apply(n,apply(n,apply(b,b)))))),n),apply(b,apply(b,X1))) = apply(strong_fixed_point,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(n,apply(X1,apply(X2,X3))),X3),X4) = apply(apply(apply(n,apply(n,apply(apply(b,X1),X2))),X3),X4),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(n,apply(b,X1)),X2),X3) = apply(apply(X1,apply(X3,X2)),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(n,apply(apply(b,b),X1)),X2),X3) = apply(apply(X1,X3),apply(X2,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(n,apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(n,apply(n,apply(b,b))),n))),n),apply(b,apply(b,X1))) = apply(strong_fixed_point,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(n,apply(b,b)),X1),X2),X3) = apply(apply(X2,X1),apply(X2,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(n,apply(n,apply(b,b))),n),apply(b,apply(b,X1))),apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,X1)))) = apply(strong_fixed_point,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(n,apply(n,apply(b,b))),X1),X2) = apply(apply(X1,X2),apply(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,X1))),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(apply(X3,X2),X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,X1))),apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,X1)))),apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,X1)))) = apply(strong_fixed_point,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt) != apply(fixed_pt,apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_strong_fixed_point]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,X1))),apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,X2)))),apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,X2)))) = apply(X1,apply(strong_fixed_point,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt) != apply(fixed_pt,apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt)),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    apply(X1,apply(strong_fixed_point,X1)) = apply(strong_fixed_point,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : COL044-9 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.04/0.30  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.04/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.04/0.30  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.04/0.30  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.04/0.30  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:07:06 UTC 2026
% 0.04/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.04/0.30  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.04/0.35  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.04/0.35  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 110.79/16.48  % Version: 3.5.1
% 110.79/16.48  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 110.79/16.48  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 110.79/16.48  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 110.79/16.48  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 110.79/16.48  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 110.79/16.48  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 110.79/16.48  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2533839 completed with status 0
% 110.79/16.48  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 110.79/16.48  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 110.79/16.48  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 110.79/16.48  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 110.79/16.48  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 110.79/16.48  % No SInE strategy applied
% 110.79/16.48  % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-DFFFFFNN
% 110.79/16.48  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 110.79/16.48  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 110.79/16.48  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 110.79/16.48  % Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 110.79/16.48  % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 110.79/16.48  % Starting U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 110.79/16.48  % U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2533847 completed with status 0
% 110.79/16.48  % Result found by U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 110.79/16.48  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 110.79/16.48  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 110.79/16.48  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 110.79/16.48  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 110.79/16.48  % No SInE strategy applied
% 110.79/16.48  % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-DFFFFFNN
% 110.79/16.48  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 110.79/16.48  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 110.79/16.48  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 110.79/16.48  % Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 110.79/16.48  % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 110.79/16.48  % Starting U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 110.79/16.48  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 110.79/16.48  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 110.79/16.48  
% 110.79/16.48  % Proof found!
% 110.79/16.48  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 110.79/16.48  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 110.79/16.48  % Parsed axioms                        : 4
% 110.79/16.48  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 110.79/16.48  % Initial clauses                      : 4
% 110.79/16.48  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 110.79/16.48  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
% 110.79/16.48  % Processed clauses                    : 2939
% 110.79/16.48  % ...of these trivial                  : 754
% 110.79/16.48  % ...subsumed                          : 1000
% 110.79/16.48  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1185
% 110.79/16.48  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 110.79/16.48  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 110.79/16.48  % Backward-subsumed                    : 14
% 110.79/16.48  % Backward-rewritten                   : 161
% 110.79/16.48  % Generated clauses                    : 593216
% 110.79/16.48  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 590166
% 110.79/16.48  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 110.79/16.48  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 110.79/16.48  % Paramodulations                      : 593216
% 110.79/16.48  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 110.79/16.48  % NegExts                              : 0
% 110.79/16.48  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 110.79/16.48  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 110.79/16.48  % Total rewrite steps                  : 139227
% 110.79/16.48  % ...of those cached                   : 102644
% 110.79/16.48  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 110.79/16.48  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 110.79/16.48  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 110.79/16.48  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 110.79/16.48  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 110.79/16.48  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 110.79/16.48  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 110.79/16.48  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 110.79/16.48  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 110.79/16.48  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 110.79/16.48  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 110.79/16.48  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 110.79/16.48  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1006
% 110.79/16.48  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 696
% 110.79/16.48  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 310
% 110.79/16.48  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 110.79/16.48  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 110.79/16.48  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 586823
% 110.79/16.48  % ...number of literals in the above   : 586823
% 110.79/16.48  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 110.79/16.48  % Current number of archived clauses   : 179
% 110.79/16.48  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 110.79/16.48  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 110.79/16.48  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 110.79/16.48  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 77017
% 110.79/16.48  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 110.79/16.48  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 430325
% 110.79/16.48  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1459
% 110.79/16.48  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 110.79/16.48  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 110.79/16.48  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 32899029
% 110.79/16.48  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 110.79/16.48  
% 110.79/16.48  % -------------------------------------------------
% 110.79/16.48  % User time                : 15.407 s
% 110.79/16.48  % System time              : 0.423 s
% 110.79/16.48  % Total time               : 15.829 s
% 110.79/16.48  % Maximum resident set size: 3588 pages
% 110.79/16.48  
% 110.79/16.48  % -------------------------------------------------
% 110.79/16.48  % User time                : 76.553 s
% 110.79/16.48  % System time              : 2.278 s
% 110.79/16.48  % Total time               : 78.832 s
% 110.79/16.48  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 110.79/16.48  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------