%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : COL050-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:24:42 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.37s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : COL050-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.11/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Tue May 31 07:26:53 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.13/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.13/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04AN % 0.13/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.13/0.36 # % 0.13/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.13/0.36 # Number of axioms: 3 Number of unprocessed: 3 % 0.13/0.36 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.13/0.36 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.13/0.36 # Hello from C++ % 0.13/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.13/0.36 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.13/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.13/0.36 # 3 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.13/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.13/0.36 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.13/0.36 # Found 3 unit axioms. % 0.13/0.36 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.13/0.36 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.13/0.36 # 3 unit axiom clauses % 0.13/0.36 % 0.13/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.13/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.13/0.36 # Creating equality axioms % 0.13/0.36 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 0.13/0.36 # Returning from population with 9 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.13/0.36 # We now have 9 tableaux to operate on % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.13/0.37 % 0.13/0.37 # End clausification derivation % 0.13/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_5, hypothesis, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)=response(X1,response(X2,X3)))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (response(mocking_bird,X1)=response(X1,X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (response(a,X1)!=X1)). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.13/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.13/0.37 # Begin printing tableau % 0.13/0.37 # Found 6 steps % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_5, hypothesis, (response(compose(X15,X14),compose(X15,X14))=response(X15,response(X14,compose(X15,X14)))), inference(start_rule)). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (response(compose(X15,X14),compose(X15,X14))=response(X15,response(X14,compose(X15,X14)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (response(a,response(X15,response(X14,compose(X15,X14))))=response(X15,response(X14,compose(X15,X14)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (response(a,response(X15,response(X14,compose(X15,X14))))!=response(compose(X15,X14),compose(X15,X14))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (response(mocking_bird,compose(X15,X14))!=response(compose(X15,X14),compose(X15,X14))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (response(a,response(X15,response(X14,compose(X15,X14))))!=response(mocking_bird,compose(X15,X14))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_36, ...])). % 0.13/0.37 # End printing tableau % 0.13/0.37 # SZS output end % 0.13/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.13/0.37 % 0.13/0.37 # End clausification derivation % 0.13/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_5, hypothesis, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)=response(X1,response(X2,X3)))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (response(mocking_bird,X1)=response(X1,X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (response(a,X1)!=X1)). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.13/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.13/0.37 # Begin printing tableau % 0.13/0.37 # Found 6 steps % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_5, hypothesis, (response(compose(mocking_bird,X11),X10)=response(mocking_bird,response(X11,X10))), inference(start_rule)). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (response(compose(mocking_bird,X11),X10)=response(mocking_bird,response(X11,X10))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (response(a,response(compose(mocking_bird,X11),X10))=response(compose(mocking_bird,X11),X10)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (response(mocking_bird,response(X11,X10))!=response(a,response(compose(mocking_bird,X11),X10))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (response(mocking_bird,response(X11,X10))!=response(response(X11,X10),response(X11,X10))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (response(response(X11,X10),response(X11,X10))!=response(a,response(compose(mocking_bird,X11),X10))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_37, ...])). % 0.13/0.37 # End printing tableau % 0.13/0.37 # SZS output end % 0.13/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.13/0.37 % 0.13/0.37 # End clausification derivation % 0.13/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_5, hypothesis, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)=response(X1,response(X2,X3)))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (response(mocking_bird,X1)=response(X1,X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (response(a,X1)!=X1)). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.13/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.13/0.37 # Begin printing tableau % 0.13/0.37 # Found 6 steps % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (response(a,response(a,response(a,X8)))!=response(a,response(a,X8))), inference(start_rule)). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (response(a,response(a,response(a,X8)))!=response(a,response(a,X8))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_39, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (response(a,response(a,X8))!=response(a,X8)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_52, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_53, plain, (response(a,X8)!=X8), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_53, ...])). % 0.13/0.37 # End printing tableau % 0.13/0.37 # SZS output end % 0.13/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.13/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.13/0.37 % 0.13/0.37 # End clausification derivation % 0.13/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_5, hypothesis, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)=response(X1,response(X2,X3)))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (response(mocking_bird,X1)=response(X1,X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (response(a,X1)!=X1)). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.13/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.13/0.37 # Begin printing tableau % 0.13/0.37 # Found 5 steps % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (response(mocking_bird,a)=response(a,a)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (response(mocking_bird,a)=response(a,a)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (response(a,a)=response(mocking_bird,a)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (response(a,a)=a), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (response(mocking_bird,a)!=a), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_37, ...])). % 0.13/0.37 # End printing tableau % 0.13/0.37 # SZS output end % 0.13/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.13/0.37 % 0.13/0.37 # End clausification derivation % 0.13/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_5, hypothesis, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)=response(X1,response(X2,X3)))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (response(mocking_bird,X1)=response(X1,X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (response(a,X1)!=X1)). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.13/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.13/0.37 # Begin printing tableau % 0.13/0.37 # Found 6 steps % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_5, hypothesis, (response(compose(X12,X13),X14)=response(X12,response(X13,X14))), inference(start_rule)). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (response(compose(X12,X13),X14)=response(X12,response(X13,X14))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (response(compose(X20,X19),X18)!=response(X20,response(X19,X18))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (response(response(compose(X20,X19),X18),response(compose(X12,X13),X14))=response(response(X20,response(X19,X18)),response(X12,response(X13,X14)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_13])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_81, plain, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)!=response(X1,response(X2,X3))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_79, plain, (compose(response(response(compose(X20,X19),X18),response(compose(X12,X13),X14)),response(compose(X1,X2),X3))=compose(response(response(X20,response(X19,X18)),response(X12,response(X13,X14))),response(X1,response(X2,X3)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_79, ...])). % 0.13/0.37 # End printing tableau % 0.13/0.37 # SZS output end % 0.13/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.13/0.37 % 0.13/0.37 # End clausification derivation % 0.13/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_5, hypothesis, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)=response(X1,response(X2,X3)))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (response(mocking_bird,X1)=response(X1,X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (response(a,X1)!=X1)). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.13/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.13/0.37 # Begin printing tableau % 0.13/0.37 # Found 6 steps % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_5, hypothesis, (response(compose(X20,X19),X18)=response(X20,response(X19,X18))), inference(start_rule)). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (response(compose(X20,X19),X18)=response(X20,response(X19,X18))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (response(compose(X15,X16),X17)!=response(X15,response(X16,X17))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (response(response(compose(X20,X19),X18),response(compose(X15,X16),X17))=response(response(X20,response(X19,X18)),response(X15,response(X16,X17)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_13])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_81, plain, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)!=response(X1,response(X2,X3))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_79, plain, (compose(response(response(compose(X20,X19),X18),response(compose(X15,X16),X17)),response(compose(X1,X2),X3))=compose(response(response(X20,response(X19,X18)),response(X15,response(X16,X17))),response(X1,response(X2,X3)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_79, ...])). % 0.13/0.37 # End printing tableau % 0.13/0.37 # SZS output end % 0.13/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.13/0.37 # Child (28830) has found a proof. % 0.13/0.37 % 0.13/0.37 # Proof search is over... % 0.13/0.37 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------