↑ Up

Metis---2.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : COL050-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:36:18 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.34s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   21 (  14 unt;   0 nHn;  13 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   31 (  30 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(mocking_bird_exists,axiom,
    response(mocking_bird,Y) = response(Y,Y) ).

cnf(composer_exists,hypothesis,
    response(compose(X,Y),W) = response(X,response(Y,W)) ).

cnf(prove_all_fond_of_another,negated_conjecture,
    response(a,Y) != Y ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    response(a,response(X_6,compose(a,X_6))) != response(X_6,compose(a,X_6)),
    inference(subst,[],[prove_all_fond_of_another:[bind(Y,$fot(response(X_6,compose(a,X_6))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    response(mocking_bird,compose(X_3,X_4)) = response(compose(X_3,X_4),compose(X_3,X_4)),
    inference(subst,[],[mocking_bird_exists:[bind(Y,$fot(compose(X_3,X_4)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    response(compose(X_3,X_4),compose(X_3,X_4)) = response(X_3,response(X_4,compose(X_3,X_4))),
    inference(subst,[],[composer_exists:[bind(W,$fot(compose(X_3,X_4))),bind(X,$fot(X_3)),bind(Y,$fot(X_4))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    ( response(compose(X_3,X_4),compose(X_3,X_4)) != response(X_3,response(X_4,compose(X_3,X_4)))
    | response(mocking_bird,compose(X_3,X_4)) != response(compose(X_3,X_4),compose(X_3,X_4))
    | response(mocking_bird,compose(X_3,X_4)) = response(X_3,response(X_4,compose(X_3,X_4))) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(response(mocking_bird,compose(X_3,X_4)),response(compose(X_3,X_4),compose(X_3,X_4))) ),[1],$fot(response(X_3,response(X_4,compose(X_3,X_4))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    ( response(mocking_bird,compose(X_3,X_4)) != response(compose(X_3,X_4),compose(X_3,X_4))
    | response(mocking_bird,compose(X_3,X_4)) = response(X_3,response(X_4,compose(X_3,X_4))) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(response(compose(X_3,X_4),compose(X_3,X_4)),response(X_3,response(X_4,compose(X_3,X_4)))) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    response(mocking_bird,compose(X_3,X_4)) = response(X_3,response(X_4,compose(X_3,X_4))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(response(mocking_bird,compose(X_3,X_4)),response(compose(X_3,X_4),compose(X_3,X_4))) )],[refute_0_1,refute_0_4]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    response(mocking_bird,compose(a,X_6)) = response(a,response(X_6,compose(a,X_6))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_5:[bind(X_3,$fot(a)),bind(X_4,$fot(X_6))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    X0 = X0,
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(X0)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    ( X0 != X0
    | X0 != Y0
    | Y0 = X0 ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(X0,X0) ),[0],$fot(Y0)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    ( X0 != Y0
    | Y0 = X0 ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(X0,X0) )],[refute_0_7,refute_0_8]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    ( response(mocking_bird,compose(a,X_6)) != response(a,response(X_6,compose(a,X_6)))
    | response(a,response(X_6,compose(a,X_6))) = response(mocking_bird,compose(a,X_6)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_9:[bind(X0,$fot(response(mocking_bird,compose(a,X_6)))),bind(Y0,$fot(response(a,response(X_6,compose(a,X_6)))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    response(a,response(X_6,compose(a,X_6))) = response(mocking_bird,compose(a,X_6)),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(response(mocking_bird,compose(a,X_6)),response(a,response(X_6,compose(a,X_6)))) )],[refute_0_6,refute_0_10]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    ( response(a,response(X_6,compose(a,X_6))) != response(mocking_bird,compose(a,X_6))
    | response(mocking_bird,compose(a,X_6)) != response(X_6,compose(a,X_6))
    | response(a,response(X_6,compose(a,X_6))) = response(X_6,compose(a,X_6)) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( ~ $equal(response(a,response(X_6,compose(a,X_6))),response(X_6,compose(a,X_6))) ),[0],$fot(response(mocking_bird,compose(a,X_6)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    ( response(mocking_bird,compose(a,X_6)) != response(X_6,compose(a,X_6))
    | response(a,response(X_6,compose(a,X_6))) = response(X_6,compose(a,X_6)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(response(a,response(X_6,compose(a,X_6))),response(mocking_bird,compose(a,X_6))) )],[refute_0_11,refute_0_12]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    response(mocking_bird,compose(a,X_6)) != response(X_6,compose(a,X_6)),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(response(a,response(X_6,compose(a,X_6))),response(X_6,compose(a,X_6))) )],[refute_0_13,refute_0_0]) ).

cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
    response(mocking_bird,compose(a,mocking_bird)) != response(mocking_bird,compose(a,mocking_bird)),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_14:[bind(X_6,$fot(mocking_bird))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
    response(mocking_bird,compose(a,mocking_bird)) = response(mocking_bird,compose(a,mocking_bird)),
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(response(mocking_bird,compose(a,mocking_bird)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(response(mocking_bird,compose(a,mocking_bird)),response(mocking_bird,compose(a,mocking_bird))) )],[refute_0_16,refute_0_15]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : COL050-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue May 31 07:27:28 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.34  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------