%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : COL052-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:24:42 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.36s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : COL052-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.11/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue May 31 06:20:47 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.12/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.12/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic C12_02_nc_SAT001_MinMin_rr % 0.12/0.36 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred. % 0.12/0.36 # % 0.12/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.12/0.36 # Number of axioms: 4 Number of unprocessed: 4 % 0.12/0.36 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.12/0.36 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.12/0.36 # Hello from C++ % 0.12/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.12/0.36 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.12/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.12/0.36 # 4 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.12/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.12/0.36 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.12/0.36 # Found 4 unit axioms. % 0.12/0.36 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.12/0.36 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.12/0.36 # 4 unit axiom clauses % 0.12/0.36 % 0.12/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.12/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.12/0.36 # Creating equality axioms % 0.12/0.36 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 0.12/0.36 # Returning from population with 11 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.12/0.36 # We now have 11 tableaux to operate on % 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.12/0.36 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.12/0.36 % 0.12/0.36 # End clausification derivation % 0.12/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_8, hypothesis, (compose(a,b)=c)). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)=response(X1,response(X2,X3)))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_6, hypothesis, (response(c,common_bird(X1))=response(X1,common_bird(X1)))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (response(odd_bird,X1)!=response(a,X1))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.12/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.12/0.36 # Begin printing tableau % 0.12/0.36 # Found 5 steps % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_8, hypothesis, (compose(a,b)=c), inference(start_rule)). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (compose(a,b)=c), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_16])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (common_bird(compose(a,b))=common_bird(c)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_14])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_99, plain, (compose(a,b)!=c), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_97, plain, (compose(common_bird(compose(a,b)),compose(a,b))=compose(common_bird(c),c)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_97, ...])). % 0.12/0.36 # End printing tableau % 0.12/0.36 # SZS output end % 0.12/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.12/0.36 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.12/0.36 % 0.12/0.36 # End clausification derivation % 0.12/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_8, hypothesis, (compose(a,b)=c)). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)=response(X1,response(X2,X3)))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_6, hypothesis, (response(c,common_bird(X1))=response(X1,common_bird(X1)))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (response(odd_bird,X1)!=response(a,X1))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.12/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.12/0.36 # Begin printing tableau % 0.12/0.36 # Found 6 steps % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_8, hypothesis, (compose(a,b)=c), inference(start_rule)). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (compose(a,b)=c), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (compose(a,b)!=c), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (response(compose(a,b),compose(a,b))=response(c,c)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_14])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_96, plain, (compose(a,b)!=c), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_94, plain, (compose(response(compose(a,b),compose(a,b)),compose(a,b))=compose(response(c,c),c)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_94, ...])). % 0.12/0.36 # End printing tableau % 0.12/0.36 # SZS output end % 0.12/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.12/0.36 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.12/0.36 % 0.12/0.36 # End clausification derivation % 0.12/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_8, hypothesis, (compose(a,b)=c)). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)=response(X1,response(X2,X3)))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_6, hypothesis, (response(c,common_bird(X1))=response(X1,common_bird(X1)))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (response(odd_bird,X1)!=response(a,X1))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.12/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.12/0.36 # Begin printing tableau % 0.12/0.36 # Found 6 steps % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_8, hypothesis, (compose(a,b)=c), inference(start_rule)). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (compose(a,b)=c), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (compose(a,b)!=c), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (response(compose(a,b),compose(a,b))=response(c,c)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_14])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_96, plain, (compose(a,b)!=c), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_94, plain, (compose(response(compose(a,b),compose(a,b)),compose(a,b))=compose(response(c,c),c)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_94, ...])). % 0.12/0.36 # End printing tableau % 0.12/0.36 # SZS output end % 0.12/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.12/0.36 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.12/0.36 % 0.12/0.36 # End clausification derivation % 0.12/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_8, hypothesis, (compose(a,b)=c)). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)=response(X1,response(X2,X3)))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_6, hypothesis, (response(c,common_bird(X1))=response(X1,common_bird(X1)))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (response(odd_bird,X1)!=response(a,X1))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.12/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.12/0.36 # Begin printing tableau % 0.12/0.36 # Found 6 steps % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_8, hypothesis, (compose(a,b)=c), inference(start_rule)). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (compose(a,b)=c), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_14])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (compose(a,b)!=c), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (compose(compose(a,b),compose(a,b))=compose(c,c)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_93, plain, (compose(a,b)!=c), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_91, plain, (response(compose(compose(a,b),compose(a,b)),compose(a,b))=response(compose(c,c),c)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_91, ...])). % 0.12/0.36 # End printing tableau % 0.12/0.36 # SZS output end % 0.12/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.12/0.36 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.12/0.36 % 0.12/0.36 # End clausification derivation % 0.12/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_8, hypothesis, (compose(a,b)=c)). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)=response(X1,response(X2,X3)))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_6, hypothesis, (response(c,common_bird(X1))=response(X1,common_bird(X1)))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (response(odd_bird,X1)!=response(a,X1))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.12/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.12/0.36 # Begin printing tableau % 0.12/0.36 # Found 6 steps % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_8, hypothesis, (compose(a,b)=c), inference(start_rule)). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (compose(a,b)=c), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_14])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (compose(a,b)!=c), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (compose(compose(a,b),compose(a,b))=compose(c,c)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_93, plain, (compose(a,b)!=c), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_91, plain, (response(compose(compose(a,b),compose(a,b)),compose(a,b))=response(compose(c,c),c)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_91, ...])). % 0.12/0.36 # End printing tableau % 0.12/0.36 # SZS output end % 0.12/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.12/0.36 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.12/0.36 % 0.12/0.36 # End clausification derivation % 0.12/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_8, hypothesis, (compose(a,b)=c)). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)=response(X1,response(X2,X3)))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_6, hypothesis, (response(c,common_bird(X1))=response(X1,common_bird(X1)))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (response(odd_bird,X1)!=response(a,X1))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.12/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.12/0.36 # Begin printing tableau % 0.12/0.36 # Found 6 steps % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_8, hypothesis, (compose(a,b)=c), inference(start_rule)). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (compose(a,b)=c), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_13])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (compose(a,b)!=c), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (c=c), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_14])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_93, plain, (compose(a,b)!=c), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_91, plain, (compose(c,compose(a,b))=compose(c,c)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_91, ...])). % 0.12/0.36 # End printing tableau % 0.12/0.36 # SZS output end % 0.12/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.12/0.36 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.12/0.36 # Child (15566) has found a proof. % 0.12/0.36 % 0.12/0.36 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.12/0.36 % 0.12/0.36 # End clausification derivation % 0.12/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_8, hypothesis, (compose(a,b)=c)). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)=response(X1,response(X2,X3)))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_6, hypothesis, (response(c,common_bird(X1))=response(X1,common_bird(X1)))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (response(odd_bird,X1)!=response(a,X1))). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (X4=X4)). % 0.12/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.12/0.36 # Begin printing tableau % 0.12/0.36 # Found 6 steps % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)=response(X1,response(X2,X3))), inference(start_rule)). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)=response(X1,response(X2,X3))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_13])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)!=response(X1,response(X2,X3))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (response(compose(X1,X2),X3)=response(compose(X1,X2),X3)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_14])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (compose(a,b)!=c), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.12/0.36 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (compose(response(compose(X1,X2),X3),compose(a,b))=compose(response(compose(X1,X2),X3),c)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_48, ...])). % 0.12/0.36 # End printing tableau % 0.12/0.36 # SZS output end % 0.12/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.12/0.36 # Proof search is over... % 0.12/0.36 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------