%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : COL052-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:17:21 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 14.83s 14.99s
% Output : Refutation 14.83s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 24 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_a_is_agreeable,negated_conjecture,
response(a,X9) != response(odd_bird,X9),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_a_is_agreeable) ).
cnf(composer_exists,axiom,
response(compose(X7,X6),X8) = response(X7,response(X6,X8)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',composer_exists) ).
cnf(transitivity,axiom,
( X12 != X10
| X10 != X11
| X12 = X11 ),
theory(equality) ).
cnf(c11,plain,
( X51 != response(compose(X52,X49),X50)
| X51 = response(X52,response(X49,X50)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[transitivity,composer_exists]) ).
cnf(agreeable1,plain,
response(c,common_bird(X16)) = response(X16,common_bird(X16)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',agreeable1) ).
cnf(c13,plain,
( X61 != response(c,common_bird(X60))
| X61 = response(X60,common_bird(X60)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[agreeable1,transitivity]) ).
cnf(symmetry,axiom,
( X4 != X3
| X3 = X4 ),
theory(equality) ).
cnf(c_composes_a_with_b,plain,
c = compose(a,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_composes_a_with_b) ).
cnf(reflexivity,axiom,
X2 = X2,
theory(equality) ).
cnf(c0,axiom,
( X25 != X23
| X24 != X22
| response(X25,X24) = response(X23,X22) ),
theory(equality) ).
cnf(c27,plain,
( X35 != X34
| response(X35,X33) = response(X34,X33) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c0,reflexivity]) ).
cnf(c55,plain,
response(c,X55) = response(compose(a,b),X55),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c27,c_composes_a_with_b]) ).
cnf(c102,plain,
response(c,X73) = response(a,response(b,X73)),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c55,c11]) ).
cnf(c152,plain,
response(a,response(b,X81)) = response(c,X81),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c102,symmetry]) ).
cnf(c163,plain,
response(a,response(b,common_bird(X110))) = response(X110,common_bird(X110)),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c152,c13]) ).
cnf(c360,plain,
response(a,response(b,common_bird(compose(X2058,X2059)))) = response(X2058,response(X2059,common_bird(compose(X2058,X2059)))),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c163,c11]) ).
cnf(c31039,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c360,prove_a_is_agreeable]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : COL052-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.14/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33 % DateTime : Wed May 8 21:38:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 14.83/14.99 % Version: 1.5
% 14.83/14.99 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 14.83/14.99 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 14.83/14.99
% 14.83/14.99 % Initial clauses : 10
% 14.83/14.99 % Processed clauses : 604
% 14.83/14.99 % Factors computed : 3
% 14.83/14.99 % Resolvents computed: 31037
% 14.83/14.99 % Tautologies deleted: 2
% 14.83/14.99 % Forward subsumed : 708
% 14.83/14.99 % Backward subsumed : 2
% 14.83/14.99 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 14.83/14.99 % User time : 14.525 s
% 14.83/14.99 % System time : 0.120 s
% 14.83/14.99 % Total time : 14.645 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------