↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : COL052-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:57:32 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   27 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   14 (   9   ~;   5   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0 sgn   7   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(composer_exists,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : response(compose(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_2) = response(VAR_0,response(VAR_1,VAR_2)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',composer_exists) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    response(compose(A,B),C) = response(A,response(B,C)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[composer_exists]) ).

fof(agreeable1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( response(VAR_0,common_bird(VAR_1)) = response(VAR_1,common_bird(VAR_1))
      | ~ agreeable(VAR_0) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',agreeable1) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    ( response(A,common_bird(B)) = response(B,common_bird(B))
    | ~ agreeable(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[agreeable1]) ).

fof(agreeable2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( agreeable(VAR_0)
      | response(VAR_0,VAR_1) != response(compatible(VAR_0),VAR_1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',agreeable2) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    ( agreeable(A)
    | response(A,B) != response(compatible(A),B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[agreeable2]) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    ( agreeable(A)
    | response(compatible(A),B) != response(A,B) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_3]) ).

fof(c_is_agreeable,axiom,
    agreeable(c),
    file('theBenchmark.p',c_is_agreeable) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    agreeable(c),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[c_is_agreeable]) ).

fof(prove_a_is_agreeable,axiom,
    ~ agreeable(a),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_a_is_agreeable) ).

cnf(c_6,plain,
    ~ agreeable(a),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_a_is_agreeable]) ).

fof(c_composes_a_with_b,axiom,
    c = compose(a,b),
    file('theBenchmark.p',c_composes_a_with_b) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    c = compose(a,b),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[c_composes_a_with_b]) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    compose(a,b) = c,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_7]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    response(c,common_bird(A)) = response(A,common_bird(A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    response(compatible(a),A) != response(a,A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_6]) ).

cnf(c_34,plain,
    response(c,A) = response(a,response(b,A)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_1]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    response(a,response(b,A)) = response(c,A),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_34]) ).

cnf(c_20,plain,
    response(c,common_bird(compose(A,B))) = response(A,response(B,common_bird(compose(A,B)))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_1]) ).

cnf(c_32,plain,
    response(compatible(a),response(b,A)) != response(c,A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_11]) ).

cnf(c_35,plain,
    response(A,response(B,common_bird(compose(A,B)))) = response(c,common_bird(compose(A,B))),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_20]) ).

cnf(c_33,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_35]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : COL052-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 23:09:20 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.38  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.38  % Process 2454503 was started by sandbox on n019,
% 0.09/0.38  % Sat Sep 26 23:09:20 2026
% 0.09/0.38  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.15/0.39  % Length of proof is 14.
% 0.15/0.39  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.15/0.39  % Maximum clause weight is 15.000.
% 0.15/0.39  % Given clauses 13.
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------