%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.7
% Problem : COL052-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:37:17 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 0.24s
% Output : Proof 0.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : COL052-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.16 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.16 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.16 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.16 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.16 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.16 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.16 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.16 % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 21:37:03 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.16 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.16 Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.24 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --complete-subsets --ground-joining-incomplete-limit 15 --flatten-every 2
% 0.10/0.24
% 0.10/0.24 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.10/0.24
% 0.10/0.24 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.10/0.24 Axiom 1 (c_is_agreeable): agreeable(c) = true.
% 0.10/0.24 Axiom 2 (c_composes_a_with_b): c = compose(a, b).
% 0.10/0.24 Axiom 3 (composer_exists): response(compose(X, Y), Z) = response(X, response(Y, Z)).
% 0.10/0.24 Axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.10/0.24 Axiom 5 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq2(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.10/0.24 Axiom 6 (agreeable2): ifeq2(response(X, Y), response(compatible(X), Y), agreeable(X), true) = true.
% 0.10/0.24 Axiom 7 (agreeable1): ifeq(agreeable(X), true, response(X, common_bird(Y)), response(Y, common_bird(Y))) = response(Y, common_bird(Y)).
% 0.10/0.24
% 0.10/0.24 Goal 1 (prove_a_is_agreeable): agreeable(a) = true.
% 0.10/0.24 Proof:
% 0.10/0.24 agreeable(a)
% 0.10/0.24 = { by axiom 5 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.10/0.24 ifeq2(response(c, common_bird(compose(compatible(a), b))), response(c, common_bird(compose(compatible(a), b))), agreeable(a), true)
% 0.10/0.24 = { by axiom 4 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.10/0.24 ifeq2(response(c, common_bird(compose(compatible(a), b))), ifeq(true, true, response(c, common_bird(compose(compatible(a), b))), response(compose(compatible(a), b), common_bird(compose(compatible(a), b)))), agreeable(a), true)
% 0.10/0.24 = { by axiom 1 (c_is_agreeable) R->L }
% 0.10/0.24 ifeq2(response(c, common_bird(compose(compatible(a), b))), ifeq(agreeable(c), true, response(c, common_bird(compose(compatible(a), b))), response(compose(compatible(a), b), common_bird(compose(compatible(a), b)))), agreeable(a), true)
% 0.10/0.24 = { by axiom 7 (agreeable1) }
% 0.10/0.24 ifeq2(response(c, common_bird(compose(compatible(a), b))), response(compose(compatible(a), b), common_bird(compose(compatible(a), b))), agreeable(a), true)
% 0.10/0.24 = { by axiom 3 (composer_exists) }
% 0.10/0.24 ifeq2(response(c, common_bird(compose(compatible(a), b))), response(compatible(a), response(b, common_bird(compose(compatible(a), b)))), agreeable(a), true)
% 0.10/0.24 = { by axiom 2 (c_composes_a_with_b) }
% 0.10/0.24 ifeq2(response(compose(a, b), common_bird(compose(compatible(a), b))), response(compatible(a), response(b, common_bird(compose(compatible(a), b)))), agreeable(a), true)
% 0.10/0.24 = { by axiom 3 (composer_exists) }
% 0.10/0.24 ifeq2(response(a, response(b, common_bird(compose(compatible(a), b)))), response(compatible(a), response(b, common_bird(compose(compatible(a), b)))), agreeable(a), true)
% 0.10/0.24 = { by axiom 6 (agreeable2) }
% 0.10/0.24 true
% 0.10/0.24 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.10/0.24
% 0.10/0.24 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------