↑ Up

Bliksem---1.12.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem  : COL053-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : bliksem %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 0s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:12:30 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.94s
% Output   : Refutation 0.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem  : COL053-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.11  % Command  : bliksem %s
% 0.11/0.30  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.30  % DateTime : Tue May 31 04:33:13 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.54/0.94  *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.54/0.94  *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 0.54/0.94  *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 0.54/0.94  Bliksem 1.12
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  Automatic Strategy Selection
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  Clauses:
% 0.54/0.94  [
% 0.54/0.94     [ =( response( compose( X, Y ), Z ), response( X, response( Y, Z ) ) ) ]
% 0.54/0.94    ,
% 0.54/0.94     [ ~( =( response( X, f( X ) ), response( a, response( b, response( c, f( 
% 0.54/0.94    X ) ) ) ) ) ) ]
% 0.54/0.94  ] .
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  percentage equality = 1.000000, percentage horn = 1.000000
% 0.54/0.94  This is a pure equality problem
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  Options Used:
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  useres =            1
% 0.54/0.94  useparamod =        1
% 0.54/0.94  useeqrefl =         1
% 0.54/0.94  useeqfact =         1
% 0.54/0.94  usefactor =         1
% 0.54/0.94  usesimpsplitting =  0
% 0.54/0.94  usesimpdemod =      5
% 0.54/0.94  usesimpres =        3
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  resimpinuse      =  1000
% 0.54/0.94  resimpclauses =     20000
% 0.54/0.94  substype =          eqrewr
% 0.54/0.94  backwardsubs =      1
% 0.54/0.94  selectoldest =      5
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  litorderings [0] =  split
% 0.54/0.94  litorderings [1] =  extend the termordering, first sorting on arguments
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  termordering =      kbo
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  litapriori =        0
% 0.54/0.94  termapriori =       1
% 0.54/0.94  litaposteriori =    0
% 0.54/0.94  termaposteriori =   0
% 0.54/0.94  demodaposteriori =  0
% 0.54/0.94  ordereqreflfact =   0
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  litselect =         negord
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  maxweight =         15
% 0.54/0.94  maxdepth =          30000
% 0.54/0.94  maxlength =         115
% 0.54/0.94  maxnrvars =         195
% 0.54/0.94  excuselevel =       1
% 0.54/0.94  increasemaxweight = 1
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  maxselected =       10000000
% 0.54/0.94  maxnrclauses =      10000000
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  showgenerated =    0
% 0.54/0.94  showkept =         0
% 0.54/0.94  showselected =     0
% 0.54/0.94  showdeleted =      0
% 0.54/0.94  showresimp =       1
% 0.54/0.94  showstatus =       2000
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  prologoutput =     1
% 0.54/0.94  nrgoals =          5000000
% 0.54/0.94  totalproof =       1
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  {}  [0, 0]      (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.54/0.94  .  [1, 2]      (w:1, o:22, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.54/0.94  !  [4, 1]      (w:0, o:16, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.54/0.94  =  [13, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.54/0.94  ==>  [14, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.54/0.94  compose  [41, 2]      (w:1, o:47, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.54/0.94  response  [43, 2]      (w:1, o:48, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.54/0.94  f  [45, 1]      (w:1, o:21, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.54/0.94  a  [46, 0]      (w:1, o:13, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.54/0.94  b  [47, 0]      (w:1, o:14, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.54/0.94  c  [48, 0]      (w:1, o:15, a:1, s:1, b:0).
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  Starting Search:
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  Bliksems!, er is een bewijs:
% 0.54/0.94  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.54/0.94  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  clause( 0, [ =( response( X, response( Y, Z ) ), response( compose( X, Y )
% 0.54/0.94    , Z ) ) ] )
% 0.54/0.94  .
% 0.54/0.94  clause( 1, [ ~( =( response( X, f( X ) ), response( compose( compose( a, b
% 0.54/0.94     ), c ), f( X ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.54/0.94  .
% 0.54/0.94  clause( 2, [] )
% 0.54/0.94  .
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.54/0.94  found a proof!
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  % ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  initialclauses(
% 0.54/0.94  [ clause( 4, [ =( response( compose( X, Y ), Z ), response( X, response( Y
% 0.54/0.94    , Z ) ) ) ] )
% 0.54/0.94  , clause( 5, [ ~( =( response( X, f( X ) ), response( a, response( b, 
% 0.54/0.94    response( c, f( X ) ) ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.54/0.94  ] ).
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  eqswap(
% 0.54/0.94  clause( 6, [ =( response( X, response( Y, Z ) ), response( compose( X, Y )
% 0.54/0.94    , Z ) ) ] )
% 0.54/0.94  , clause( 4, [ =( response( compose( X, Y ), Z ), response( X, response( Y
% 0.54/0.94    , Z ) ) ) ] )
% 0.54/0.94  , 0, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y ), :=( Z, Z )] )).
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  subsumption(
% 0.54/0.94  clause( 0, [ =( response( X, response( Y, Z ) ), response( compose( X, Y )
% 0.54/0.94    , Z ) ) ] )
% 0.54/0.94  , clause( 6, [ =( response( X, response( Y, Z ) ), response( compose( X, Y
% 0.54/0.94     ), Z ) ) ] )
% 0.54/0.94  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y ), :=( Z, Z )] ), 
% 0.54/0.94    permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0 )] ) ).
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  paramod(
% 0.54/0.94  clause( 15, [ ~( =( response( X, f( X ) ), response( compose( a, b ), 
% 0.54/0.94    response( c, f( X ) ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.54/0.94  , clause( 0, [ =( response( X, response( Y, Z ) ), response( compose( X, Y
% 0.54/0.94     ), Z ) ) ] )
% 0.54/0.94  , 0, clause( 5, [ ~( =( response( X, f( X ) ), response( a, response( b, 
% 0.54/0.94    response( c, f( X ) ) ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.54/0.94  , 0, 6, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, a ), :=( Y, b ), :=( Z, response( c, f( X
% 0.54/0.94     ) ) )] ), substitution( 1, [ :=( X, X )] )).
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  paramod(
% 0.54/0.94  clause( 21, [ ~( =( response( X, f( X ) ), response( compose( compose( a, b
% 0.54/0.94     ), c ), f( X ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.54/0.94  , clause( 0, [ =( response( X, response( Y, Z ) ), response( compose( X, Y
% 0.54/0.94     ), Z ) ) ] )
% 0.54/0.94  , 0, clause( 15, [ ~( =( response( X, f( X ) ), response( compose( a, b ), 
% 0.54/0.94    response( c, f( X ) ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.54/0.94  , 0, 6, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, compose( a, b ) ), :=( Y, c ), :=( Z, f( 
% 0.54/0.94    X ) )] ), substitution( 1, [ :=( X, X )] )).
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  subsumption(
% 0.54/0.94  clause( 1, [ ~( =( response( X, f( X ) ), response( compose( compose( a, b
% 0.54/0.94     ), c ), f( X ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.54/0.94  , clause( 21, [ ~( =( response( X, f( X ) ), response( compose( compose( a
% 0.54/0.94    , b ), c ), f( X ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.54/0.94  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0 )] ) ).
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  eqswap(
% 0.54/0.94  clause( 23, [ ~( =( response( compose( compose( a, b ), c ), f( X ) ), 
% 0.54/0.94    response( X, f( X ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.54/0.94  , clause( 1, [ ~( =( response( X, f( X ) ), response( compose( compose( a, 
% 0.54/0.94    b ), c ), f( X ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.54/0.94  , 0, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X )] )).
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  eqrefl(
% 0.54/0.94  clause( 24, [] )
% 0.54/0.94  , clause( 23, [ ~( =( response( compose( compose( a, b ), c ), f( X ) ), 
% 0.54/0.94    response( X, f( X ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.54/0.94  , 0, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, compose( compose( a, b ), c ) )] )).
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  subsumption(
% 0.54/0.94  clause( 2, [] )
% 0.54/0.94  , clause( 24, [] )
% 0.54/0.94  , substitution( 0, [] ), permutation( 0, [] ) ).
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  end.
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  % ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  Memory use:
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  space for terms:        90
% 0.54/0.94  space for clauses:      319
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  clauses generated:      3
% 0.54/0.94  clauses kept:           3
% 0.54/0.94  clauses selected:       0
% 0.54/0.94  clauses deleted:        0
% 0.54/0.94  clauses inuse deleted:  0
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  subsentry:          39
% 0.54/0.94  literals s-matched: 12
% 0.54/0.94  literals matched:   12
% 0.54/0.94  full subsumption:   0
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  checksum:           -1712529571
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  
% 0.54/0.94  Bliksem ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------