↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : COL053-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.MTqRhTeJPg true

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:30:16 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.57s 0.74s
% Output   : Refutation 0.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : COL053-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.MTqRhTeJPg true
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 10:58:38 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.34  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.57/0.64  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.57/0.64  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.57/0.64  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.57/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.57/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.57/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.57/0.74  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.57/0.74  % BCE start: 2
% 0.57/0.74  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.57/0.74  % PE start: 2
% 0.57/0.74  logic: eq
% 0.57/0.74  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.57/0.74  % done 3 iterations in 0.011s
% 0.57/0.74  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.57/0.74  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.57/0.74  thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.57/0.74  thf(f_type, type, f: $i > $i).
% 0.57/0.74  thf(compose_type, type, compose: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.57/0.74  thf(response_type, type, response: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.57/0.74  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.57/0.74  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.57/0.74  thf(composer_exists, axiom,
% 0.57/0.74    (( response @ ( compose @ X @ Y ) @ W ) =
% 0.57/0.74     ( response @ X @ ( response @ Y @ W ) ))).
% 0.57/0.74  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.57/0.74      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.74         ((response @ (compose @ X0 @ X1) @ X2)
% 0.57/0.74           = (response @ X0 @ (response @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 0.57/0.74      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [composer_exists])).
% 0.57/0.74  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.57/0.74      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.74         ((response @ (compose @ X0 @ X1) @ X2)
% 0.57/0.74           = (response @ X0 @ (response @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 0.57/0.74      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [composer_exists])).
% 0.57/0.74  thf(prove_bird_exists, conjecture,
% 0.57/0.74    (( response @ U @ ( f @ U ) ) =
% 0.57/0.74     ( response @ a @ ( response @ b @ ( response @ c @ ( f @ U ) ) ) ))).
% 0.57/0.74  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.57/0.74    (( response @ U @ ( f @ U ) ) !=
% 0.57/0.74     ( response @ a @ ( response @ b @ ( response @ c @ ( f @ U ) ) ) )),
% 0.57/0.74    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_bird_exists])).
% 0.57/0.74  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.57/0.74      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.74         ((response @ X0 @ (f @ X0))
% 0.57/0.74           != (response @ a @ (response @ b @ (response @ c @ (f @ X0)))))),
% 0.57/0.74      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.57/0.74  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.57/0.74      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.74         ((response @ X1 @ (response @ X0 @ (f @ (compose @ X1 @ X0))))
% 0.57/0.74           != (response @ a @ 
% 0.57/0.74               (response @ b @ (response @ c @ (f @ (compose @ X1 @ X0))))))),
% 0.57/0.74      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 0.57/0.74  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.57/0.74      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.57/0.74         ((response @ X2 @ 
% 0.57/0.74           (response @ X1 @ 
% 0.57/0.74            (response @ X0 @ (f @ (compose @ (compose @ X2 @ X1) @ X0)))))
% 0.57/0.74           != (response @ a @ 
% 0.57/0.74               (response @ b @ 
% 0.57/0.74                (response @ c @ (f @ (compose @ (compose @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))))))),
% 0.57/0.74      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.57/0.74  thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain, ($false),
% 0.57/0.74      inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.57/0.74  
% 0.57/0.74  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.57/0.74  
% 0.57/0.74  
% 0.57/0.74  % Terminating...
% 1.53/0.85  % Runner terminated.
% 1.53/0.86  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------