↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : COL063-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:09:28 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.03s 0.84s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.03s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (  15 unt;   0 nHn;  11 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   15 (  14 equ;  10 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_f_combinator,negated_conjecture,
    apply(apply(apply(X1,f(X1)),g(X1)),h(X1)) != apply(apply(h(X1),g(X1)),f(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_f_combinator) ).

cnf(b_definition,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_definition) ).

cnf(t_definition,axiom,
    apply(apply(t,X1),X2) = apply(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t_definition) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    apply(apply(apply(X1,f(X1)),g(X1)),h(X1)) != apply(apply(h(X1),g(X1)),f(X1)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_f_combinator]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    apply(apply(apply(X1,f(X1)),g(X1)),h(X1)) != apply(apply(h(X1),g(X1)),f(X1)),
    c_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
    b_definition ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    apply(apply(apply(X1,apply(X2,f(apply(apply(b,X1),X2)))),g(apply(apply(b,X1),X2))),h(apply(apply(b,X1),X2))) != apply(apply(h(apply(apply(b,X1),X2)),g(apply(apply(b,X1),X2))),f(apply(apply(b,X1),X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    apply(apply(t,X1),X2) = apply(X2,X1),
    t_definition ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(X1,f(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X2)),X1))),X2),g(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X2)),X1))),h(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X2)),X1))) != apply(apply(h(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X2)),X1)),g(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X2)),X1))),f(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X2)),X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(X1,apply(X2,f(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X3)),apply(apply(b,X1),X2))))),X3),g(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X3)),apply(apply(b,X1),X2)))),h(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X3)),apply(apply(b,X1),X2)))) != apply(apply(h(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X3)),apply(apply(b,X1),X2))),g(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X3)),apply(apply(b,X1),X2)))),f(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X3)),apply(apply(b,X1),X2)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    apply(apply(apply(X1,f(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X2)),apply(apply(b,b),X1)))),apply(X2,g(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X2)),apply(apply(b,b),X1))))),h(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X2)),apply(apply(b,b),X1)))) != apply(apply(h(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X2)),apply(apply(b,b),X1))),g(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X2)),apply(apply(b,b),X1)))),f(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X2)),apply(apply(b,b),X1)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    apply(apply(apply(X1,apply(X2,f(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X3)),apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(b,X1),X2)))))),apply(X3,g(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X3)),apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(b,X1),X2)))))),h(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X3)),apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(b,X1),X2))))) != apply(apply(h(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X3)),apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(b,X1),X2)))),g(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X3)),apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(b,X1),X2))))),f(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X3)),apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(b,X1),X2))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    apply(apply(X1,f(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X2)),apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(b,b),X1))))),apply(apply(X2,g(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X2)),apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(b,b),X1))))),h(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X2)),apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(b,b),X1)))))) != apply(apply(h(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X2)),apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(b,b),X1)))),g(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X2)),apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(b,b),X1))))),f(apply(apply(b,apply(t,X2)),apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(b,b),X1))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    apply(apply(X1,f(apply(apply(b,apply(t,t)),apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(b,b),X1))))),apply(h(apply(apply(b,apply(t,t)),apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(b,b),X1)))),g(apply(apply(b,apply(t,t)),apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(b,b),X1)))))) != apply(apply(h(apply(apply(b,apply(t,t)),apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(b,b),X1)))),g(apply(apply(b,apply(t,t)),apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(b,b),X1))))),f(apply(apply(b,apply(t,t)),apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(b,b),X1))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_7]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : COL063-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:09:59 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.03/0.84  % Version: 3.5.1
% 2.03/0.84  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 2.03/0.84  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.03/0.84  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.03/0.84  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.03/0.84  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.03/0.84  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.03/0.84  % new_bool_1 with pid 2095120 completed with status 9
% 2.03/0.84  % new_bool_3 with pid 2095118 completed with status 9
% 2.03/0.84  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2095117 completed with status 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 2.03/0.84  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 2.03/0.84  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.03/0.84  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.03/0.84  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.03/0.84  % No SInE strategy applied
% 2.03/0.84  % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 2.03/0.84  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.03/0.84  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 2.03/0.84  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 2.03/0.84  % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 2.03/0.84  % Starting U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 2.03/0.84  % Starting U----_206d_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 2.03/0.84  % U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2095125 completed with status 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Result found by U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 2.03/0.84  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 2.03/0.84  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.03/0.84  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.03/0.84  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.03/0.84  % No SInE strategy applied
% 2.03/0.84  % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 2.03/0.84  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.03/0.84  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 2.03/0.84  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 2.03/0.84  % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 2.03/0.84  % Starting U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 2.03/0.84  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 2.03/0.84  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 2.03/0.84  
% 2.03/0.84  % Proof found!
% 2.03/0.84  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.03/0.84  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.03/0.84  % Parsed axioms                        : 3
% 2.03/0.84  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Initial clauses                      : 3
% 2.03/0.84  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
% 2.03/0.84  % Processed clauses                    : 1543
% 2.03/0.84  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % ...subsumed                          : 312
% 2.03/0.84  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1231
% 2.03/0.84  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Generated clauses                    : 3773
% 2.03/0.84  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3771
% 2.03/0.84  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Paramodulations                      : 3773
% 2.03/0.84  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % NegExts                              : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 2.03/0.84  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 2.03/0.84  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.03/0.84  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 2.03/0.84  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.03/0.84  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 2.03/0.84  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 2.03/0.84  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 2.03/0.84  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 2.03/0.84  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 2.03/0.84  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 2.03/0.84  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 2.03/0.84  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1228
% 2.03/0.84  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 2.03/0.84  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.03/0.84  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1226
% 2.03/0.84  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2232
% 2.03/0.84  % ...number of literals in the above   : 2232
% 2.03/0.84  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 2.03/0.84  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 204728
% 2.03/0.84  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 2.03/0.84  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 2.03/0.84  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 511685
% 2.03/0.84  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 2.03/0.84  
% 2.03/0.84  % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.03/0.84  % User time                : 0.310 s
% 2.03/0.84  % System time              : 0.055 s
% 2.03/0.84  % Total time               : 0.365 s
% 2.03/0.84  % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 2.03/0.84  
% 2.03/0.84  % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.03/0.84  % User time                : 1.660 s
% 2.03/0.84  % System time              : 0.326 s
% 2.03/0.84  % Total time               : 1.987 s
% 2.03/0.84  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 2.03/0.84  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------