↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : COL066-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:41:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.56s 2.81s
% Output   : Refutation 2.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (  15 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   15 (  14 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(b_definition,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(b,X),Y),Z) = apply(X,apply(Y,Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_definition) ).

cnf(q_definition,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(q,X),Y),Z) = apply(Y,apply(X,Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',q_definition) ).

cnf(w_definition,axiom,
    apply(apply(w,X),Y) = apply(apply(X,Y),Y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',w_definition) ).

cnf(prove_p_combinator,negated_conjecture,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(q,q),apply(w,apply(q,apply(q,q)))),x),y),y),z) != apply(apply(x,y),apply(apply(x,y),z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_p_combinator) ).

cnf(5,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(w,apply(apply(apply(apply(q,w),apply(q,q)),apply(q,apply(q,q))),x)),y),z) != apply(apply(x,y),apply(apply(x,y),z)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[prove_p_combinator,w_definition,q_definition,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(10,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(w,b),X),Y) = apply(X,apply(X,Y)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[b_definition,w_definition,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(14,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(b,w),X),Y),Z) = apply(apply(apply(X,Y),Z),Z),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[w_definition,b_definition,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(21,plain,
    apply(apply(w,apply(q,X)),Y) = apply(Y,apply(X,Y)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[w_definition,q_definition,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(22,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(w,q),X),Y) = apply(X,apply(X,Y)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[q_definition,w_definition,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(30,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(q,X),apply(b,Y)),Z),U) = apply(Y,apply(apply(X,Z),U)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[b_definition,q_definition,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(33,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(q,X),apply(q,Y)),Z),U) = apply(apply(X,Z),apply(Y,U)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[q_definition,q_definition,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(34,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(b,w),apply(q,x)),apply(apply(q,q),apply(q,x))),y),z) != apply(apply(x,y),apply(apply(x,y),z)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[5,q_definition,30,21,33,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(136,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(w,b),X),Y) = apply(apply(apply(w,q),X),Y),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[10,22,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1003,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(b,w),apply(q,X)),Y),Z) = apply(apply(Y,apply(X,Z)),Z),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[14,q_definition,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1004,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[34,10,136,w_definition,33,1003,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : COL066-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue May 31 04:12:52 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  "."
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-31T04:12:52
% 0.18/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n022.cluster.edu at 2022-05-31T04:12:52
% 2.56/2.81  
% 2.56/2.81  
% 2.56/2.81  #||
% 2.56/2.81  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.56/2.81  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.56/2.81  ||#
% 2.56/2.81  
% 2.56/2.81  ; Summary of computation:
% 2.56/2.81  ;      3297 formulas have been input or derived (from 32 formulas).
% 2.56/2.81  ;      1004 (30%) were retained.  Of these,
% 2.56/2.81  ;           68 ( 7%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 2.56/2.81  ;          936 (93%) are still being kept.
% 2.56/2.81  ; 
% 2.56/2.81  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 2.56/2.81  ;     0.002   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 2.56/2.81  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (4 calls)
% 2.56/2.81  ;     0.111   5%   Process new row              (3,070 calls)
% 2.56/2.81  ;     0.000   0%   Resolution                   (62 calls)
% 2.56/2.81  ;     0.059   3%   Paramodulation               (31 calls)
% 2.56/2.81  ;     0.785  33%   Forward simplification       (2,958 calls)
% 2.56/2.81  ;     0.136   6%   Backward simplification      (1,003 calls)
% 2.56/2.81  ;     1.219  52%   Ordering                     (207,254 calls)
% 2.56/2.81  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 2.56/2.81  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 2.56/2.81  ;     0.032   1%   Other
% 2.56/2.81  ;     2.344        Total
% 2.56/2.81  ;     2.346        Real time
% 2.56/2.81  ; 
% 2.56/2.81  ; Term-hash-array has 3,418 terms in all.
% 2.56/2.81  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 0 entries (0 at peak, 0 added, 0 deleted).
% 2.56/2.81  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1 node (1 at peak, 1 added, 0 deleted).
% 2.56/2.81  ; Path-index has 3,250 entries (3,260 at peak, 3,453 added, 203 deleted).
% 2.56/2.81  ; Path-index has 750 nodes (774 at peak, 843 added, 93 deleted).
% 2.56/2.81  ; Trie-index has 3,250 entries (3,260 at peak, 3,453 added, 203 deleted).
% 2.56/2.81  ; Trie-index has 15,836 nodes (15,901 at peak, 16,897 added, 1,061 deleted).
% 2.56/2.81  ; Retrieved 478,139 generalization terms in 39,274 calls.
% 2.56/2.81  ; Retrieved 62,350 instance terms in 2,766 calls.
% 2.56/2.81  ; Retrieved 27,440 unifiable terms in 323 calls.
% 2.56/2.81  ; 
% 2.56/2.81  ; The agenda of rows to process has 214 entries:
% 2.56/2.81  ;     3 with value 26             16 with value 35               2 with value 46
% 2.56/2.81  ;     2 with value 27             29 with value 36               2 with value 47
% 2.56/2.81  ;    11 with value 28              9 with value 37               1 with value 48
% 2.56/2.81  ;    21 with value 29              1 with value 38               1 with value 49
% 2.56/2.81  ;     9 with value 30              4 with value 39               2 with value 51
% 2.56/2.81  ;    21 with value 31              5 with value 40               2 with value 54
% 2.56/2.81  ;    13 with value 32              2 with value 41               1 with value 59
% 2.56/2.81  ;    19 with value 33              1 with value 43               2 with value 60
% 2.56/2.81  ;    33 with value 34              1 with value 44               1 with value 66
% 2.56/2.81  ; The agenda of rows to give has 907 entries:
% 2.56/2.81  ;     8 with value (4 23)         98 with value (4 33)           4 with value (4 44)
% 2.56/2.81  ;    19 with value (4 24)         64 with value (4 34)           3 with value (4 46)
% 2.56/2.81  ;    30 with value (4 25)         86 with value (4 35)           2 with value (4 47)
% 2.56/2.81  ;    50 with value (4 26)         25 with value (4 36)           1 with value (4 48)
% 2.56/2.81  ;    37 with value (4 27)         37 with value (4 37)           1 with value (4 49)
% 2.56/2.81  ;    58 with value (4 28)         29 with value (4 38)           3 with value (4 52)
% 2.56/2.81  ;    66 with value (4 29)         12 with value (4 39)           1 with value (4 57)
% 2.56/2.81  ;    89 with value (4 30)          6 with value (4 40)           1 with value (4 61)
% 2.56/2.81  ;    95 with value (4 31)          5 with value (4 41)           1 with value (4 65)
% 2.56/2.81  ;    73 with value (4 32)          3 with value (4 42)
% 2.56/2.81  Evaluation took:
% 2.56/2.81    2.346 seconds of real time
% 2.56/2.81    2.101321 seconds of user run time
% 2.56/2.81    0.245167 seconds of system run time
% 2.56/2.81    [Run times include 0.085 seconds GC run time.]
% 2.56/2.81    0 calls to %EVAL
% 2.56/2.81    0 page faults and
% 2.56/2.81    167,337,248 bytes consed.
% 2.56/2.81  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.56/2.81  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-31T04:12:55
% 2.56/2.81  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.56/2.81  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------