%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : COL079-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:09:32 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 7.81s 6.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.81s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 23 ( 22 equ; 8 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 33 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(abstraction,axiom,
apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X1),X2),X3) = apply(apply(X1,k(X3)),apply(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',abstraction) ).
cnf(k_definition,axiom,
apply(k(X1),X2) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_definition) ).
cnf(extensionality2,axiom,
( apply(X1,n(X1,X2)) != apply(X2,n(X1,X2))
| X1 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',extensionality2) ).
cnf(prove_TRC2a,negated_conjecture,
apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,b))) != apply(abstraction,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_TRC2a) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X1),X2),X3) = apply(apply(X1,k(X3)),apply(X2,X3)),
abstraction ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
apply(k(X1),X2) = X1,
k_definition ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X1),k(X2)),X3) = apply(apply(X1,k(X3)),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( apply(X1,n(X1,X2)) != apply(X2,n(X1,X2))
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[extensionality2]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
apply(apply(X1,k(apply(X2,X3))),X3) = apply(apply(apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X1)),X2),X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( apply(X1,n(X1,X2)) != apply(X2,n(X1,X2))
| X1 = X2 ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
apply(apply(apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X1))),X2),X3) = apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X1),X2),X3),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_8]),c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X1),X2),n(apply(apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X1))),X2),X3)) != apply(X3,n(apply(apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X1))),X2),X3))
| apply(apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X1))),X2) = X3 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
apply(apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X1))),X2) = apply(apply(abstraction,X1),X2),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,b))) != apply(abstraction,b),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_TRC2a]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( apply(apply(abstraction,X1),n(apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X1))),X2)) != apply(X2,n(apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X1))),X2))
| apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X1))) = X2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,b))) != apply(abstraction,b),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,X1))) = apply(abstraction,X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : COL079-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/5.37 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/5.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:14:51 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/5.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/5.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.81/6.46 % Version: 3.5.1
% 7.81/6.46 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 7.81/6.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 7.81/6.46 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 7.81/6.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 7.81/6.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 7.81/6.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 7.81/6.46 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 3331108 completed with status 0
% 7.81/6.46 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 7.81/6.46 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 7.81/6.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 7.81/6.46 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 7.81/6.46 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 7.81/6.46 % No SInE strategy applied
% 7.81/6.46 % Search class: FHUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 7.81/6.46 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 7.81/6.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 7.81/6.46 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 7.81/6.46 % Starting U----_211g_00_C10_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 7.81/6.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 7.81/6.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 7.81/6.46 % U----_211g_00_C10_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3331116 completed with status 0
% 7.81/6.46 % Result found by U----_211g_00_C10_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.81/6.46 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 7.81/6.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 7.81/6.46 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 7.81/6.46 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 7.81/6.46 % No SInE strategy applied
% 7.81/6.46 % Search class: FHUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 7.81/6.46 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 7.81/6.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 7.81/6.46 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 7.81/6.46 % Starting U----_211g_00_C10_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 7.81/6.46 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 7.81/6.46 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.81/6.46
% 7.81/6.46 % Proof found!
% 7.81/6.46 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 7.81/6.46 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.81/6.46 % Parsed axioms : 4
% 7.81/6.46 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.81/6.46 % Initial clauses : 4
% 7.81/6.46 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.81/6.46 % Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 7.81/6.46 % Processed clauses : 1825
% 7.81/6.46 % ...of these trivial : 229
% 7.81/6.46 % ...subsumed : 1019
% 7.81/6.46 % ...remaining for further processing : 577
% 7.81/6.46 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2098
% 7.81/6.46 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.81/6.46 % Backward-subsumed : 8
% 7.81/6.46 % Backward-rewritten : 146
% 7.81/6.46 % Generated clauses : 35272
% 7.81/6.46 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 28440
% 7.81/6.46 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 7.81/6.46 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 7.81/6.46 % Paramodulations : 33165
% 7.81/6.46 % Factorizations : 0
% 7.81/6.46 % NegExts : 0
% 7.81/6.46 % Equation resolutions : 2107
% 7.81/6.46 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 7.81/6.46 % Total rewrite steps : 50654
% 7.81/6.46 % ...of those cached : 42480
% 7.81/6.46 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.81/6.46 % Propositional check models : 0
% 7.81/6.46 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 7.81/6.46 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 7.81/6.46 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 7.81/6.46 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 7.81/6.46 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 7.81/6.46 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 7.81/6.46 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 7.81/6.46 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 7.81/6.46 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 7.81/6.46 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 7.81/6.46 % Current number of processed clauses : 324
% 7.81/6.46 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 230
% 7.81/6.46 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 26
% 7.81/6.46 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 7.81/6.46 % Non-unit-clauses : 68
% 7.81/6.46 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 25965
% 7.81/6.46 % ...number of literals in the above : 32339
% 7.81/6.46 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.81/6.46 % Current number of archived clauses : 158
% 7.81/6.46 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3600
% 7.81/6.46 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3508
% 7.81/6.46 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 819
% 7.81/6.46 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 605
% 7.81/6.46 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.81/6.46 % BW rewrite match attempts : 14830
% 7.81/6.46 % BW rewrite match successes : 173
% 7.81/6.46 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.81/6.46 % Condensation successes : 0
% 7.81/6.46 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1389604
% 7.81/6.46 % Search garbage collected termcells : 5
% 7.81/6.46
% 7.81/6.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 7.81/6.46 % User time : 0.925 s
% 7.81/6.46 % System time : 0.029 s
% 7.81/6.46 % Total time : 0.955 s
% 7.81/6.46 % Maximum resident set size: 3376 pages
% 7.81/6.46
% 7.81/6.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 7.81/6.46 % User time : 4.768 s
% 7.81/6.46 % System time : 0.208 s
% 7.81/6.46 % Total time : 4.976 s
% 7.81/6.46 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 7.81/6.46 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------