↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : COL081-2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.74ToSIczEn true

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:30:22 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 1.01s
% Output   : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : COL081-2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.74ToSIczEn true
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 11:00:11 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.36  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36  % Running in FO mode
% 0.57/0.67  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.57/0.67  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.57/0.67  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.59/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.60/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.60/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.60/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.60/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.60/0.82  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.60/1.01  % Solved by fo/fo5.sh.
% 0.60/1.01  % done 110 iterations in 0.185s
% 0.60/1.01  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.60/1.01  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.60/1.01  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(k_type, type, k: $i > $i).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(apply_type, type, apply: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(n_type, type, n: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(abstraction_type, type, abstraction: $i).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(prove_TRC2c, conjecture,
% 0.60/1.01    (( k @ ( k @ b ) ) = ( apply @ abstraction @ ( k @ ( k @ b ) ) ))).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/1.01    (( k @ ( k @ b ) ) != ( apply @ abstraction @ ( k @ ( k @ b ) ) )),
% 0.60/1.01    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_TRC2c])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.60/1.01      (((k @ (k @ b)) != (apply @ abstraction @ (k @ (k @ b))))),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(abstraction, axiom,
% 0.60/1.01    (( apply @ ( apply @ ( apply @ abstraction @ X ) @ Y ) @ Z ) =
% 0.60/1.01     ( apply @ ( apply @ X @ ( k @ Z ) ) @ ( apply @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.60/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.60/1.01         ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ abstraction @ X0) @ X2) @ X1)
% 0.60/1.01           = (apply @ (apply @ X0 @ (k @ X1)) @ (apply @ X2 @ X1)))),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [abstraction])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.60/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.60/1.01         ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ abstraction @ X0) @ X2) @ X1)
% 0.60/1.01           = (apply @ (apply @ X0 @ (k @ X1)) @ (apply @ X2 @ X1)))),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [abstraction])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 0.60/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.60/1.01         ((apply @ 
% 0.60/1.01           (apply @ (apply @ (apply @ abstraction @ abstraction) @ X1) @ X0) @ 
% 0.60/1.01           X2)
% 0.60/1.01           = (apply @ (apply @ (k @ X0) @ (k @ X2)) @ 
% 0.60/1.01              (apply @ (apply @ X1 @ X0) @ X2)))),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(k_definition, axiom, (( apply @ ( k @ X ) @ Y ) = ( X ))).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.60/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((apply @ (k @ X0) @ X1) = (X0))),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [k_definition])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain,
% 0.60/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.60/1.01         ((apply @ 
% 0.60/1.01           (apply @ (apply @ (apply @ abstraction @ abstraction) @ X1) @ X0) @ 
% 0.60/1.01           X2) = (apply @ X0 @ (apply @ (apply @ X1 @ X0) @ X2)))),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl13, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.60/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((apply @ (k @ X0) @ X1) = (X0))),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [k_definition])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl901, plain,
% 0.60/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.60/1.01         ((apply @ 
% 0.60/1.01           (apply @ (apply @ (apply @ abstraction @ abstraction) @ X2) @ 
% 0.60/1.01            (k @ X1)) @ 
% 0.60/1.01           X0) = (X1))),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl20, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.60/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((apply @ (k @ X0) @ X1) = (X0))),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [k_definition])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(extensionality2, axiom,
% 0.60/1.01    (( ( X ) = ( Y ) ) | 
% 0.60/1.01     ( ( apply @ X @ ( n @ X @ Y ) ) != ( apply @ Y @ ( n @ X @ Y ) ) ))).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.60/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/1.01         (((X1) = (X0))
% 0.60/1.01          | ((apply @ X1 @ (n @ X1 @ X0)) != (apply @ X0 @ (n @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [extensionality2])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.60/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/1.01         (((X0) != (apply @ X1 @ (n @ (k @ X0) @ X1))) | ((k @ X0) = (X1)))),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl1022, plain,
% 0.60/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.60/1.01         (((X2) != (X0))
% 0.60/1.01          | ((k @ X2)
% 0.60/1.01              = (apply @ (apply @ (apply @ abstraction @ abstraction) @ X1) @ 
% 0.60/1.01                 (k @ X0))))),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl901, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl1040, plain,
% 0.60/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/1.01         ((k @ X0)
% 0.60/1.01           = (apply @ (apply @ (apply @ abstraction @ abstraction) @ X1) @ 
% 0.60/1.01              (k @ X0)))),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1022])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.60/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((apply @ (k @ X0) @ X1) = (X0))),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [k_definition])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.60/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.60/1.01         ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ abstraction @ X0) @ X2) @ X1)
% 0.60/1.01           = (apply @ (apply @ X0 @ (k @ X1)) @ (apply @ X2 @ X1)))),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [abstraction])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain,
% 0.60/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.60/1.01         ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ abstraction @ X2) @ (k @ X0)) @ X1)
% 0.60/1.01           = (apply @ (apply @ X2 @ (k @ X1)) @ X0))),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl1057, plain,
% 0.60/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/1.01         ((k @ X0) = (apply @ (apply @ abstraction @ (k @ (k @ X0))) @ X1))),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1040, zip_derived_cl16])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.60/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/1.01         (((X0) != (apply @ X1 @ (n @ (k @ X0) @ X1))) | ((k @ X0) = (X1)))),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl1081, plain,
% 0.60/1.01      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.60/1.01         (((X1) != (k @ X0))
% 0.60/1.01          | ((k @ X1) = (apply @ abstraction @ (k @ (k @ X0)))))),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1057, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl1118, plain,
% 0.60/1.01      (![X0 : $i]: ((k @ (k @ X0)) = (apply @ abstraction @ (k @ (k @ X0))))),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('eq_res', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1081])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl1119, plain, (((k @ (k @ b)) != (k @ (k @ b)))),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl1118])).
% 0.60/1.01  thf(zip_derived_cl1120, plain, ($false),
% 0.60/1.01      inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1119])).
% 0.60/1.01  
% 0.60/1.01  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.60/1.01  
% 0.60/1.01  
% 0.60/1.01  % Terminating...
% 0.88/1.09  % Runner terminated.
% 0.88/1.10  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------