↑ Up

Moca---0.1.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Moca---0.1
% Problem  : COL084-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : moca.sh %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:37:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.38s
% Output   : Proof 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : COL084-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : moca.sh %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue May 31 11:21:17 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.13/0.38  The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  	response(mocking_bird, A) = response(A, A)
% 0.13/0.38  	response(compose(A, B), C) = response(A, response(B, C))
% 0.13/0.38  	response(b, B) = A ==> \bottom
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  This holds because
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  E:
% 0.13/0.38  	f1(A, A) = false__
% 0.13/0.38  	f1(response(b, B), A) = true__
% 0.13/0.38  	response(compose(A, B), C) = response(A, response(B, C))
% 0.13/0.38  	response(mocking_bird, A) = response(A, A)
% 0.13/0.38  G:
% 0.13/0.38  	true__ = false__
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  This holds because
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  	response(mocking_bird, A) = response(A, A)
% 0.13/0.38  	response(mocking_bird, compose(Y0, Y1)) = response(Y0, response(Y1, compose(Y0, Y1)))
% 0.13/0.38  	f1(A, A) -> false__
% 0.13/0.38  	f1(response(b, B), A) -> true__
% 0.13/0.38  	response(compose(A, B), C) -> response(A, response(B, C))
% 0.13/0.38  	true__ -> false__
% 0.13/0.38  with the LPO induced by
% 0.13/0.38  	mocking_bird > f1 > response > compose > b > true__ > false__
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.13/0.38  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------