↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : COL088-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:42:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 25.94s 26.19s
% Output   : Refutation 25.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   21 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   44 (   0 equ;  30 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;  10 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(8,axiom,
    ( ~ member(comb_app(u,v),comb)
    | member(v,comb) ),
    file('COL088-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ member(u,comb)
    | ~ member(v,comb)
    | member(comb_app(v,u),comb) ),
    file('COL088-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( ~ member(u,comb)
    | member(pair(u,u),rtrancl(contract)) ),
    file('COL088-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(32,axiom,
    ( ~ trans(u)
    | ~ member(pair(v,w),u)
    | ~ member(pair(x,v),u)
    | member(pair(x,w),u) ),
    file('COL088-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(33,axiom,
    trans(rtrancl(u)),
    file('COL088-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(34,axiom,
    ( ~ member(pair(u,v),contract)
    | member(v,comb) ),
    file('COL088-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(37,axiom,
    ( ~ member(u,comb)
    | ~ member(pair(v,w),contract)
    | ~ member(pair(comb_app(w,u),x),rtrancl(contract))
    | member(pair(comb_app(v,u),x),rtrancl(contract)) ),
    file('COL088-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(39,axiom,
    member(r,comb),
    file('COL088-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(42,axiom,
    member(pair(y__dfg,z__dfg),contract),
    file('COL088-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(43,axiom,
    member(pair(comb_app(p,r),comb_app(y__dfg,r)),rtrancl(contract)),
    file('COL088-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(44,axiom,
    ~ member(pair(comb_app(p,r),comb_app(z__dfg,r)),rtrancl(contract)),
    file('COL088-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(47,plain,
    ( ~ trans(rtrancl(contract))
    | ~ member(pair(comb_app(p,r),u),rtrancl(contract))
    | ~ member(pair(u,comb_app(z__dfg,r)),rtrancl(contract)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[32,44]),
    [iquote('0:Res:32.3,44.0')] ).

cnf(50,plain,
    ( ~ member(pair(u,comb_app(z__dfg,r)),rtrancl(contract))
    | ~ member(pair(comb_app(p,r),u),rtrancl(contract)) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[47,33]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:47.0,33.0')] ).

cnf(51,plain,
    member(z__dfg,comb),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[42,34]),
    [iquote('0:Res:42.0,34.0')] ).

cnf(374,plain,
    ( ~ member(comb_app(u,v),comb)
    | ~ member(v,comb)
    | ~ member(pair(w,u),contract)
    | member(pair(comb_app(w,v),comb_app(u,v)),rtrancl(contract)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[12,37]),
    [iquote('0:Res:12.1,37.2')] ).

cnf(378,plain,
    ( ~ member(comb_app(u,v),comb)
    | ~ member(pair(w,u),contract)
    | member(pair(comb_app(w,v),comb_app(u,v)),rtrancl(contract)) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[374,8]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:374.1,8.1')] ).

cnf(1577,plain,
    ( ~ member(comb_app(z__dfg,r),comb)
    | ~ member(pair(u,z__dfg),contract)
    | ~ member(pair(comb_app(p,r),comb_app(u,r)),rtrancl(contract)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[378,50]),
    [iquote('0:Res:378.2,50.0')] ).

cnf(15018,plain,
    ( ~ member(comb_app(z__dfg,r),comb)
    | ~ member(pair(y__dfg,z__dfg),contract) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[43,1577]),
    [iquote('0:Res:43.0,1577.2')] ).

cnf(15037,plain,
    ~ member(comb_app(z__dfg,r),comb),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[15018,42]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:15018.1,42.0')] ).

cnf(15047,plain,
    ( ~ member(r,comb)
    | ~ member(z__dfg,comb) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[11,15037]),
    [iquote('0:Res:11.2,15037.0')] ).

cnf(15048,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[15047,39,51]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:15047.0,15047.1,39.0,51.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : COL088-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue May 31 13:47:28 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 25.94/26.19  
% 25.94/26.19  SPASS V 3.9 
% 25.94/26.19  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 25.94/26.19  % SZS status Theorem
% 25.94/26.19  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 25.94/26.19  SPASS derived 10628 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 6929 clauses.
% 25.94/26.19  SPASS allocated 97282 KBytes.
% 25.94/26.19  SPASS spent	0:0:25.51 on the problem.
% 25.94/26.19  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 25.94/26.19  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 25.94/26.19  		0:00:00.36 for inferences.
% 25.94/26.19  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 25.94/26.19  		0:0:24.96 for the reduction.
% 25.94/26.19  
% 25.94/26.19  
% 25.94/26.19  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 21 :
% 25.94/26.19  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 25.94/26.19  Formulae used in the proof : ap_E2 comb_intros3 reduction_refl transD trans_rtrancl contract_combD2 reduction_rls_3 ap_reduce1_2h1 ap_reduce1_2h4 ap_reduce1_2h5 ap_reduce1_2c1
% 25.94/26.19  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------