↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : COL089-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:38:25 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.25s 0.33s
% Output   : Refutation 0.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  16 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   87 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   73 (  29   ~;  43   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   0 sgn  37   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(X0,comb)
      | ~ member(X1,comb)
      | member(comb_app(X0,X1),comb) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',comb_intros3) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ member(X0,comb)
      | member(pair(X0,X0),rtrancl(contract)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reduction_refl) ).

fof(f40,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(pair(X0,X1),contract)
      | ~ member(X2,comb)
      | ~ member(pair(comb_app(X2,X1),X3),rtrancl(contract))
      | member(pair(comb_app(X2,X0),X3),rtrancl(contract)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reduction_rls_4) ).

fof(f41,axiom,
    ! [X0] : trans(rtrancl(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',trans_rtrancl) ).

fof(f42,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ trans(X0)
      | ~ member(pair(X1,X2),X0)
      | ~ member(pair(X2,X3),X0)
      | member(pair(X1,X3),X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transD) ).

fof(f43,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(pair(X0,X1),contract)
      | member(X1,comb) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',contract_combD2) ).

fof(f44,axiom,
    member(r,comb),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_reduce2_2h1) ).

fof(f47,axiom,
    member(pair(y,z),contract),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_reduce2_2h4) ).

fof(f48,axiom,
    member(pair(comb_app(r,p),comb_app(r,y)),rtrancl(contract)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_reduce2_2h5) ).

fof(f49,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(pair(comb_app(r,p),comb_app(r,z)),rtrancl(contract)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_reduce2_2c1) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(comb_app(X0,X1),comb)
      | member(X1,comb)
      | member(X0,comb) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ member(pair(X0,X0),rtrancl(contract))
      | member(X0,comb) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f76,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(pair(comb_app(X2,X0),X3),rtrancl(contract))
      | member(X2,comb)
      | member(pair(comb_app(X2,X1),X3),rtrancl(contract))
      | member(pair(X0,X1),contract) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ trans(X0)
      | member(pair(X1,X2),X0)
      | member(pair(X2,X3),X0)
      | ~ member(pair(X1,X3),X0) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( member(pair(X0,X1),contract)
      | ~ member(X1,comb) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f43]) ).

fof(f79,plain,
    ~ member(r,comb),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f44]) ).

fof(f82,plain,
    ~ member(pair(y,z),contract),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f47]) ).

fof(f83,plain,
    ~ member(pair(comb_app(r,p),comb_app(r,y)),rtrancl(contract)),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f48]) ).

fof(f84,plain,
    member(pair(comb_app(r,p),comb_app(r,z)),rtrancl(contract)),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f49]) ).

fof(f85,plain,
    ~ member(z,comb),
    inference(resolution,[],[f78,f82]) ).

fof(f94,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(pair(X0,X3),rtrancl(X2))
      | member(pair(X1,X3),rtrancl(X2))
      | member(pair(X0,X1),rtrancl(X2)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f77,f41]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( member(pair(X0,comb_app(r,z)),rtrancl(contract))
      | member(pair(comb_app(r,p),X0),rtrancl(contract)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f94,f84]) ).

fof(f98,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( member(pair(comb_app(r,p),X0),rtrancl(contract))
      | member(pair(X1,comb_app(r,z)),rtrancl(contract))
      | member(pair(X0,X1),rtrancl(contract)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f95,f94]) ).

fof(f102,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( member(pair(X0,comb_app(r,z)),rtrancl(contract))
      | member(pair(comb_app(r,y),X0),rtrancl(contract)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f98,f83]) ).

fof(f144,definition,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> member(comb_app(r,z),comb) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl0_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f145,plain,
    ( ~ member(comb_app(r,z),comb)
    | spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f144]) ).

fof(f146,plain,
    ( member(comb_app(r,z),comb)
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f144]) ).

fof(f193,plain,
    ( member(z,comb)
    | member(r,comb)
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f146,f56]) ).

fof(f194,plain,
    ( member(r,comb)
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f193,f85]) ).

fof(f195,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f194,f79]) ).

fof(f196,plain,
    ~ spl0_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f195]) ).

fof(f199,plain,
    ( member(pair(comb_app(r,y),comb_app(r,z)),rtrancl(contract))
    | member(comb_app(r,z),comb) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f102,f57]) ).

fof(f217,plain,
    ( member(pair(comb_app(r,y),comb_app(r,z)),rtrancl(contract))
    | spl0_1 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f199,f145]) ).

fof(f218,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( member(r,comb)
        | member(pair(comb_app(r,X0),comb_app(r,z)),rtrancl(contract))
        | member(pair(y,X0),contract) )
    | spl0_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f217,f76]) ).

fof(f225,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( member(pair(comb_app(r,X0),comb_app(r,z)),rtrancl(contract))
        | member(pair(y,X0),contract) )
    | spl0_1 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f218,f79]) ).

fof(f240,plain,
    ( member(pair(y,z),contract)
    | member(comb_app(r,z),comb)
    | spl0_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f225,f57]) ).

fof(f242,plain,
    ( member(comb_app(r,z),comb)
    | spl0_1 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f240,f82]) ).

fof(f245,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl0_1 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f242,f145]) ).

fof(f246,plain,
    spl0_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f245]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ~ spl0_1,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f196]) ).

cnf(s6,plain,
    spl0_1,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f246]) ).

cnf(s7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s3,s6]) ).

fof(f247,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s7]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : COL089-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.24  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.24  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.24  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.24  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.24  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.24  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.24  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.24  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 21:35:15 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.25  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.25  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.25/0.29  Running first-order model finding
% 0.25/0.29  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.33  % (3515430)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.25/0.33  % (3515436)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.25/0.33  % (3515436)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=2360123375:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/135531Mi)
% 0.25/0.33  % (3515439)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=770755724:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.25/0.33  % (3515436) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3515430-3515436"...
% 0.25/0.33  % (3515436)...printing done.
% 0.25/0.33  % (3515436)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.25/0.33  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.25/0.33  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.25/0.33  % (3515436)------------------------------
% 0.25/0.33  % (3515436)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.25/0.33  % (3515436)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.25/0.33  % (3515436)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.25/0.33  % (3515436)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.25/0.33  % (3515436)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 0.25/0.33  % (3515436)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.25/0.33  % (3515436)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 0.25/0.33  % (3515430)Success in time 0.031 s
% 0.25/0.33  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------