↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : COL089-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:02:49 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 57.96s 20.35s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 57.96s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   83 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   99 (  51   ~;  48   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   50 (   0 sgn  50   !;   0   ?;  36   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f167,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( member(comb_app(X0,X1),comb)
      | ~ member(X1,comb)
      | ~ member(X0,comb) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',comb_intros3) ).

fof(f168,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( member(pair(X0,X0),rtrancl(contract))
      | ~ member(X0,comb) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reduction_refl) ).

fof(f196,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( member(pair(comb_app(X2,X0),X3),rtrancl(contract))
      | ~ member(pair(comb_app(X2,X1),X3),rtrancl(contract))
      | ~ member(X2,comb)
      | ~ member(pair(X0,X1),contract) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reduction_rls_4) ).

fof(f197,axiom,
    ! [X0] : trans(rtrancl(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',trans_rtrancl) ).

fof(f198,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( member(pair(X1,X3),X0)
      | ~ member(pair(X2,X3),X0)
      | ~ member(pair(X1,X2),X0)
      | ~ trans(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transD) ).

fof(f199,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( member(X1,comb)
      | ~ member(pair(X0,X1),contract) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',contract_combD2) ).

fof(f200,axiom,
    member(r,comb),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_reduce2_2h1) ).

fof(f203,axiom,
    member(pair(y,z),contract),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_reduce2_2h4) ).

fof(f204,axiom,
    member(pair(comb_app(r,p),comb_app(r,y)),rtrancl(contract)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_reduce2_2h5) ).

fof(f205,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(pair(comb_app(r,p),comb_app(r,z)),rtrancl(contract)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_reduce2_2c1) ).

tcf(c_379,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( member(comb_app(X1,X0),comb)
      | ~ member(X1,comb)
      | ~ member(X0,comb) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f167]) ).

tcf(c_380,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( member(pair(X0,X0),rtrancl(contract))
      | ~ member(X0,comb) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f168]) ).

tcf(c_403,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( member(pair(comb_app(X0,X3),X2),rtrancl(contract))
      | ~ member(X0,comb)
      | ~ member(pair(X3,X1),contract)
      | ~ member(pair(comb_app(X0,X1),X2),rtrancl(contract)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f196]) ).

tcf(c_404,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : trans(rtrancl(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f197]) ).

tcf(c_405,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( member(pair(X0,X3),X2)
      | ~ trans(X2)
      | ~ member(pair(X1,X3),X2)
      | ~ member(pair(X0,X1),X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f198]) ).

tcf(c_406,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( member(X1,comb)
      | ~ member(pair(X0,X1),contract) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f199]) ).

tcf(c_407,plain,
    member(r,comb),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f200]) ).

tcf(c_410,plain,
    member(pair(y,z),contract),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f203]) ).

tcf(c_411,plain,
    member(pair(comb_app(r,p),comb_app(r,y)),rtrancl(contract)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f204]) ).

tcf(c_412,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(pair(comb_app(r,p),comb_app(r,z)),rtrancl(contract)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f205]) ).

tcf(c_1927,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( member(pair(X2,X4),X1)
      | ~ member(pair(X3,X4),X1)
      | ~ member(pair(X2,X3),X1)
      | ( rtrancl(X0) != X1 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_404,c_405]) ).

tcf(c_1928,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( member(pair(X0,X3),rtrancl(X2))
      | ~ member(pair(X1,X3),rtrancl(X2))
      | ~ member(pair(X0,X1),rtrancl(X2)) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_1927]) ).

tcf(c_6576,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( member(pair(comb_app(r,p),X0),rtrancl(contract))
      | ~ member(pair(comb_app(r,y),X0),rtrancl(contract)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_411,c_1928]) ).

tcf(c_6609,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( member(pair(comb_app(X2,X0),comb_app(X2,X1)),rtrancl(contract))
      | ~ member(X2,comb)
      | ~ member(comb_app(X2,X1),comb)
      | ~ member(pair(X0,X1),contract) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_380,c_403]) ).

tcf(c_6714,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( member(pair(comb_app(r,p),comb_app(r,X0)),rtrancl(contract))
      | ~ member(r,comb)
      | ~ member(comb_app(r,X0),comb)
      | ~ member(pair(y,X0),contract) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6609,c_6576]) ).

tcf(c_6943,plain,
    member(z,comb),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_410,c_406]) ).

tcf(c_6956,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( member(pair(comb_app(r,p),X0),rtrancl(contract))
      | ~ member(pair(comb_app(r,y),X0),rtrancl(contract)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_411,c_1928]) ).

tcf(c_6969,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( member(pair(comb_app(X2,X0),comb_app(X2,X1)),rtrancl(contract))
      | ~ member(X2,comb)
      | ~ member(comb_app(X2,X1),comb)
      | ~ member(pair(X0,X1),contract) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_380,c_403]) ).

tcf(c_6971,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( member(comb_app(r,X0),comb)
      | ~ member(r,comb)
      | ~ member(X0,comb) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_379]) ).

tcf(c_6997,plain,
    ( member(comb_app(r,z),comb)
    | ~ member(z,comb)
    | ~ member(r,comb) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_6971]) ).

tcf(c_7068,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( member(pair(comb_app(r,p),comb_app(r,X0)),rtrancl(contract))
      | ~ member(r,comb)
      | ~ member(comb_app(r,X0),comb)
      | ~ member(pair(y,X0),contract) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6969,c_6956]) ).

tcf(c_7416,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( member(pair(comb_app(r,p),comb_app(r,X0)),rtrancl(contract))
      | ~ member(pair(y,X0),contract)
      | ~ member(comb_app(r,X0),comb) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_7068,c_407,c_6714]) ).

tcf(c_7417,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( member(pair(comb_app(r,p),comb_app(r,X0)),rtrancl(contract))
      | ~ member(comb_app(r,X0),comb)
      | ~ member(pair(y,X0),contract) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_7416]) ).

tcf(c_7421,plain,
    ( ~ member(comb_app(r,z),comb)
    | ~ member(pair(y,z),contract) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_7417,c_412]) ).

tcf(c_7423,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_7421,c_6997,c_6943,c_410,c_407]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : COL089-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 07:31:21 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.41  
% 0.08/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.08/0.41  
% 0.08/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.08/0.43  % Proving...
% 57.96/20.35  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 57.96/20.35  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 57.96/20.35  
% 57.96/20.35  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 57.96/20.35  
% 57.96/20.35  % ------  iProver source info
% 57.96/20.35  
% 57.96/20.35  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 57.96/20.35  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 57.96/20.35  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 57.96/20.35  
% 57.96/20.35  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 57.96/20.35  
% 57.96/20.35  
% 57.96/20.35  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 57.96/20.35  
% 57.96/20.35  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 11 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 4 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 57.96/20.35  
% 57.96/20.35  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 57.96/20.35  
% 57.96/20.35  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 57.96/20.35  % ------ Proving...
% 57.96/20.35  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 57.96/20.35  
% 57.96/20.35  % 
% 57.96/20.35  % clauses                               155
% 57.96/20.35  % conjectures                           1
% 57.96/20.35  % EPR                                   14
% 57.96/20.35  % Horn                                  129
% 57.96/20.35  % unary                                 24
% 57.96/20.35  % binary                                86
% 57.96/20.36  % lits                                  341
% 57.96/20.36  % lits eq                               55
% 57.96/20.36  % fd_pure                               0
% 57.96/20.36  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 57.96/20.36  % fd_cond                               0
% 57.96/20.36  % fd_pseudo_cond                        19
% 57.96/20.36  % AC symbols                            0
% 57.96/20.36  
% 57.96/20.36  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 57.96/20.36  
% 57.96/20.36  
% 57.96/20.36  % ------ 
% 57.96/20.36  % Current options:
% 57.96/20.36  % ------ 
% 57.96/20.36  
% 57.96/20.36  
% 57.96/20.36  % 
% 57.96/20.36  
% 57.96/20.36  % ------ Proving...
% 57.96/20.36  % 
% 57.96/20.36  
% 57.96/20.36  % ------ Proving...
% 57.96/20.36  % 
% 57.96/20.36  
% 57.96/20.36  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 57.96/20.36  
% 57.96/20.36  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 57.96/20.36  
% 57.96/20.36  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------