↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : COL090-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:41:50 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.38s 0.59s
% Output   : Refutation 0.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   24 (  16 unt;   3 nHn;  24 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   36 (   8 equ;  19 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (  27 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(k_s,axiom,
    combK != combS,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_s) ).

cnf(s_app,axiom,
    combS != comb_app(X,Y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s_app) ).

cnf(app_app1,axiom,
    ( comb_app(X,Y) != comb_app(Z,U)
    | X = Z ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',app_app1) ).

cnf(ap_contractE1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(pair(comb_app(X,Y),Z),contract)
    | ap_contractE_c1(X,Y,Z)
    | ap_contractE_c2(X,Y,Z)
    | ap_contractE_c3(X,Y,Z)
    | ap_contractE_c4(X,Y,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE1) ).

cnf(ap_contractE4,axiom,
    ( ~ ap_contractE_c1(X,Y,Z)
    | X = comb_app(combK,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE4) ).

cnf(ap_contractE9,axiom,
    ( ~ ap_contractE_c2(X,Y,Z)
    | X = comb_app(comb_app(combS,ap_contractE_sk1p(X,Y,Z)),ap_contractE_sk1q(X,Y,Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE9) ).

cnf(ap_contractE10,axiom,
    ( ~ ap_contractE_c3(X,Y,Z)
    | member(pair(X,ap_contractE_sk2q(X,Y,Z)),contract) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE10) ).

cnf(ap_contractE13,axiom,
    ( ~ ap_contractE_c4(X,Y,Z)
    | member(pair(Y,ap_contractE_sk3q(X,Y,Z)),contract) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE13) ).

cnf(k_contractE,axiom,
    ~ member(pair(combK,X),contract),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_contractE) ).

cnf(s_contractE,axiom,
    ~ member(pair(combS,X),contract),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s_contractE) ).

cnf(i_contract_E,negated_conjecture,
    member(pair(comb_app(comb_app(combS,combK),combK),r),contract),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i_contract_E) ).

cnf(36,plain,
    ~ ap_contractE_c1(combS,X,Y),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[ap_contractE4,s_app]) ).

cnf(37,plain,
    comb_app(combK,X) != comb_app(combS,Y),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[app_app1,k_s]) ).

cnf(38,plain,
    comb_app(combS,X) != comb_app(comb_app(Y,Z),U),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[app_app1,s_app]) ).

cnf(48,plain,
    ~ ap_contractE_c3(combS,X,Y),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[ap_contractE10,s_contractE]) ).

cnf(51,plain,
    ~ ap_contractE_c4(X,combK,Y),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[ap_contractE13,k_contractE]) ).

cnf(60,plain,
    ~ ap_contractE_c2(combS,X,Y),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[ap_contractE9,s_app]) ).

cnf(63,plain,
    ( ap_contractE_c1(comb_app(combS,combK),combK,r)
    | ap_contractE_c2(comb_app(combS,combK),combK,r)
    | ap_contractE_c3(comb_app(combS,combK),combK,r) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[ap_contractE1,i_contract_E]),51]) ).

cnf(76,plain,
    ~ member(pair(comb_app(combS,combK),X),contract),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[ap_contractE1,60,36,48,51]) ).

cnf(358,plain,
    ~ ap_contractE_c1(comb_app(combS,X),Y,Z),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[ap_contractE4,37]) ).

cnf(359,plain,
    ( ap_contractE_c2(comb_app(combS,combK),combK,r)
    | ap_contractE_c3(comb_app(combS,combK),combK,r) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[63,358]) ).

cnf(382,plain,
    ~ ap_contractE_c3(comb_app(combS,combK),X,Y),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[ap_contractE10,76]) ).

cnf(383,plain,
    ap_contractE_c2(comb_app(combS,combK),combK,r),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[359,382]) ).

cnf(387,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[ap_contractE9,383]),38]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : COL090-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Tue May 31 08:49:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  "."
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-31T08:49:08
% 0.19/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n020.cluster.edu at 2022-05-31T08:49:08
% 0.38/0.59  
% 0.38/0.59  
% 0.38/0.59  #||
% 0.38/0.59  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/0.59  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.38/0.59  ||#
% 0.38/0.59  
% 0.38/0.59  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.38/0.59  ;       948 formulas have been input or derived (from 72 formulas).
% 0.38/0.59  ;       387 (41%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.38/0.59  ;            2 ( 1%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.38/0.59  ;          385 (99%) are still being kept.
% 0.38/0.59  ; 
% 0.38/0.59  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.38/0.59  ;     0.006   5%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.38/0.59  ;     0.001   1%   Assert                       (32 calls)
% 0.38/0.59  ;     0.047  40%   Process new row              (902 calls)
% 0.38/0.59  ;     0.020  17%   Resolution                   (142 calls)
% 0.38/0.59  ;     0.001   1%   Paramodulation               (71 calls)
% 0.38/0.59  ;     0.001   1%   Condensing                   (26 calls)
% 0.38/0.59  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (26 calls)
% 0.38/0.59  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (26 calls)
% 0.38/0.59  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (8 calls)
% 0.38/0.59  ;     0.010   9%   Forward simplification       (902 calls)
% 0.38/0.59  ;     0.002   2%   Backward simplification      (387 calls)
% 0.38/0.59  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering                     (8 calls)
% 0.38/0.59  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.38/0.59  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.38/0.59  ;     0.029  25%   Other
% 0.38/0.59  ;     0.117        Total
% 0.38/0.59  ;     0.118        Real time
% 0.38/0.59  ; 
% 0.38/0.59  ; Term-hash-array has 1,220 terms in all.
% 0.38/0.59  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 24 entries (25 at peak, 26 added, 2 deleted).
% 0.38/0.59  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 91 nodes (105 at peak, 118 added, 27 deleted).
% 0.38/0.59  ;  Retrieved 3 possibly forward subsuming rows in 26 calls.
% 0.38/0.59  ;  Retrieved 5 possibly backward subsumed rows in 26 calls.
% 0.38/0.59  ; Path-index has 1,223 entries (1,223 at peak, 1,228 added, 5 deleted).
% 0.38/0.59  ; Path-index has 647 nodes (647 at peak, 663 added, 16 deleted).
% 0.38/0.59  ; Trie-index has 1,223 entries (1,223 at peak, 1,228 added, 5 deleted).
% 0.38/0.59  ; Trie-index has 8,675 nodes (8,675 at peak, 8,695 added, 20 deleted).
% 0.38/0.59  ; Retrieved 514 generalization terms in 957 calls.
% 0.38/0.59  ; Retrieved 362 instance terms in 360 calls.
% 0.38/0.59  ; Retrieved 6,483 unifiable terms in 1,275 calls.
% 0.38/0.59  ; 
% 0.38/0.59  ; The agenda of rows to process has 3 entries:
% 0.38/0.59  ;     3 with value 26
% 0.38/0.59  ; The agenda of rows to give has 313 entries:
% 0.38/0.59  ;     2 with value (4 11)         12 with value (4 17)          16 with value (4 30)
% 0.38/0.59  ;    19 with value (4 12)          8 with value (4 20)          32 with value (4 33)
% 0.38/0.59  ;     6 with value (4 13)         16 with value (4 22)          32 with value (4 34)
% 0.38/0.59  ;    20 with value (4 14)          8 with value (4 23)          32 with value (4 35)
% 0.38/0.59  ;     6 with value (4 15)         16 with value (4 28)          64 with value (4 39)
% 0.38/0.59  ;     8 with value (4 16)         16 with value (4 29)
% 0.38/0.59  Evaluation took:
% 0.38/0.59    0.119 seconds of real time
% 0.38/0.59    0.104482 seconds of user run time
% 0.38/0.59    0.014551 seconds of system run time
% 0.38/0.59    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.38/0.59    0 page faults and
% 0.38/0.59    8,991,208 bytes consed.
% 0.38/0.59  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.38/0.59  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-31T08:49:09
% 0.38/0.59  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.38/0.59  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------