↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : COL091-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:14:33 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.31s 0.58s
% Output   : Proof 0.31s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(k_s,axiom,
    combK != combS,
    file('theBenchmark.p',k_s) ).

cnf(k_app,axiom,
    combK != comb_app(P,Q),
    file('theBenchmark.p',k_app) ).

cnf(s_app,axiom,
    combS != comb_app(P,Q),
    file('theBenchmark.p',s_app) ).

cnf(app_app1,axiom,
    ( P1 = P2
    | comb_app(P1,Q1) != comb_app(P2,Q2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',app_app1) ).

cnf(app_app2,axiom,
    ( Q1 = Q2
    | comb_app(P1,Q1) != comb_app(P2,Q2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',app_app2) ).

cnf(app_app3,axiom,
    ( comb_app(P1,Q1) = comb_app(P2,Q2)
    | Q1 != Q2
    | P1 != P2 ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',app_app3) ).

cnf(ap_E1,axiom,
    ( member(P,comb)
    | ~ member(comb_app(P,Q),comb) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ap_E1) ).

cnf(ap_E2,axiom,
    ( member(Q,comb)
    | ~ member(comb_app(P,Q),comb) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ap_E2) ).

cnf(comb_intros1,axiom,
    member(combK,comb),
    file('theBenchmark.p',comb_intros1) ).

cnf(comb_intros2,axiom,
    member(combS,comb),
    file('theBenchmark.p',comb_intros2) ).

cnf(comb_intros3,axiom,
    ( member(comb_app(P,Q),comb)
    | ~ member(Q,comb)
    | ~ member(P,comb) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',comb_intros3) ).

cnf(reduction_refl,axiom,
    ( member(pair(A,A),rtrancl(contract))
    | ~ member(A,comb) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',reduction_refl) ).

cnf(contract_K,axiom,
    ( member(pair(comb_app(comb_app(combK,P),Q),P),contract)
    | ~ member(Q,comb)
    | ~ member(P,comb) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',contract_K) ).

cnf(contract_S,axiom,
    ( member(pair(comb_app(comb_app(comb_app(combS,P),Q),R),comb_app(comb_app(P,R),comb_app(Q,R))),contract)
    | ~ member(R,comb)
    | ~ member(Q,comb)
    | ~ member(P,comb) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',contract_S) ).

cnf(ap_contractE1,axiom,
    ( ap_contractE_c4(P,Q,R)
    | ap_contractE_c3(P,Q,R)
    | ap_contractE_c2(P,Q,R)
    | ap_contractE_c1(P,Q,R)
    | ~ member(pair(comb_app(P,Q),R),contract) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE1) ).

cnf(ap_contractE2,axiom,
    ( member(R,comb)
    | ~ ap_contractE_c1(P,Q,R) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE2) ).

cnf(ap_contractE3,axiom,
    ( member(Q,comb)
    | ~ ap_contractE_c1(P,Q,R) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE3) ).

cnf(ap_contractE4,axiom,
    ( P = comb_app(combK,R)
    | ~ ap_contractE_c1(P,Q,R) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE4) ).

cnf(ap_contractE5,axiom,
    ( member(ap_contractE_sk1p(P,Q,R),comb)
    | ~ ap_contractE_c2(P,Q,R) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE5) ).

cnf(ap_contractE6,axiom,
    ( member(ap_contractE_sk1q(P,Q,R),comb)
    | ~ ap_contractE_c2(P,Q,R) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE6) ).

cnf(ap_contractE7,axiom,
    ( member(Q,comb)
    | ~ ap_contractE_c2(P,Q,R) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE7) ).

cnf(ap_contractE8,axiom,
    ( R = comb_app(comb_app(ap_contractE_sk1p(P,Q,R),Q),comb_app(ap_contractE_sk1q(P,Q,R),Q))
    | ~ ap_contractE_c2(P,Q,R) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE8) ).

cnf(ap_contractE9,axiom,
    ( P = comb_app(comb_app(combS,ap_contractE_sk1p(P,Q,R)),ap_contractE_sk1q(P,Q,R))
    | ~ ap_contractE_c2(P,Q,R) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE9) ).

cnf(ap_contractE10,axiom,
    ( member(pair(P,ap_contractE_sk2q(P,Q,R)),contract)
    | ~ ap_contractE_c3(P,Q,R) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE10) ).

cnf(ap_contractE11,axiom,
    ( member(Q,comb)
    | ~ ap_contractE_c3(P,Q,R) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE11) ).

cnf(ap_contractE12,axiom,
    ( R = comb_app(ap_contractE_sk2q(P,Q,R),Q)
    | ~ ap_contractE_c3(P,Q,R) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE12) ).

cnf(ap_contractE13,axiom,
    ( member(pair(Q,ap_contractE_sk3q(P,Q,R)),contract)
    | ~ ap_contractE_c4(P,Q,R) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE13) ).

cnf(ap_contractE14,axiom,
    ( member(P,comb)
    | ~ ap_contractE_c4(P,Q,R) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE14) ).

cnf(ap_contractE15,axiom,
    ( R = comb_app(P,ap_contractE_sk3q(P,Q,R))
    | ~ ap_contractE_c4(P,Q,R) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ap_contractE15) ).

cnf(k_contractE,axiom,
    ~ member(pair(combK,R),contract),
    file('theBenchmark.p',k_contractE) ).

cnf(s_contractE,axiom,
    ~ member(pair(combS,R),contract),
    file('theBenchmark.p',s_contractE) ).

cnf(k1_contractD_h1,hypothesis,
    member(pair(comb_app(combK,p),r),contract),
    file('theBenchmark.p',k1_contractD_h1) ).

cnf(k1_contractD_c1,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(pair(p,Q),contract)
    | r != comb_app(combK,Q) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',k1_contractD_c1) ).

cnf(equality_1,axiom,
    Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_0,
    theory(equality,[reflexivity]) ).

cnf(equality_2,axiom,
    ( Eq_x_1 = Eq_x_0
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
    theory(equality,[symmetry]) ).

cnf(equality_3,axiom,
    ( Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
    theory(equality,[transitivity]) ).

cnf(equality_4,axiom,
    ( comb_app(Eq_x_0,Eq_x_1) = comb_app(Eq_y_0,Eq_y_1)
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_y_1
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_functions]) ).

cnf(equality_5,axiom,
    ( pair(Eq_x_0,Eq_x_1) = pair(Eq_y_0,Eq_y_1)
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_y_1
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_functions]) ).

cnf(equality_6,axiom,
    ( rtrancl(Eq_x_0) = rtrancl(Eq_y_0)
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_functions]) ).

cnf(equality_7,axiom,
    ( ap_contractE_sk1p(Eq_x_0,Eq_x_1,Eq_x_2) = ap_contractE_sk1p(Eq_y_0,Eq_y_1,Eq_y_2)
    | Eq_x_2 != Eq_y_2
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_y_1
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_functions]) ).

cnf(equality_8,axiom,
    ( ap_contractE_sk1q(Eq_x_0,Eq_x_1,Eq_x_2) = ap_contractE_sk1q(Eq_y_0,Eq_y_1,Eq_y_2)
    | Eq_x_2 != Eq_y_2
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_y_1
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_functions]) ).

cnf(equality_9,axiom,
    ( ap_contractE_sk2q(Eq_x_0,Eq_x_1,Eq_x_2) = ap_contractE_sk2q(Eq_y_0,Eq_y_1,Eq_y_2)
    | Eq_x_2 != Eq_y_2
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_y_1
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_functions]) ).

cnf(equality_10,axiom,
    ( ap_contractE_sk3q(Eq_x_0,Eq_x_1,Eq_x_2) = ap_contractE_sk3q(Eq_y_0,Eq_y_1,Eq_y_2)
    | Eq_x_2 != Eq_y_2
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_y_1
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_functions]) ).

cnf(equality_11,axiom,
    ( member(Eq_y_0,Eq_y_1)
    | ~ member(Eq_x_0,Eq_x_1)
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_y_1
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_predicates]) ).

cnf(equality_12,axiom,
    ( ap_contractE_c1(Eq_y_0,Eq_y_1,Eq_y_2)
    | ~ ap_contractE_c1(Eq_x_0,Eq_x_1,Eq_x_2)
    | Eq_x_2 != Eq_y_2
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_y_1
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_predicates]) ).

cnf(equality_13,axiom,
    ( ap_contractE_c2(Eq_y_0,Eq_y_1,Eq_y_2)
    | ~ ap_contractE_c2(Eq_x_0,Eq_x_1,Eq_x_2)
    | Eq_x_2 != Eq_y_2
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_y_1
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_predicates]) ).

cnf(equality_14,axiom,
    ( ap_contractE_c3(Eq_y_0,Eq_y_1,Eq_y_2)
    | ~ ap_contractE_c3(Eq_x_0,Eq_x_1,Eq_x_2)
    | Eq_x_2 != Eq_y_2
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_y_1
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_predicates]) ).

cnf(equality_15,axiom,
    ( ap_contractE_c4(Eq_y_0,Eq_y_1,Eq_y_2)
    | ~ ap_contractE_c4(Eq_x_0,Eq_x_1,Eq_x_2)
    | Eq_x_2 != Eq_y_2
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_y_1
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_predicates]) ).

cnf(sat_proved,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cadical,[status(thm)],[]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : COL091-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 14:53:31 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.31/0.58  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.31/0.58  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------