↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : COL091-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:42:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.46s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   23 (   7 unt;   5 nHn;  23 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   47 (   0 equ;  22 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;   8 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    ~ equal(comb_app(u,v),combK),
    file('COL091-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    ( ~ member(pair(comb_app(u,v),w),contract)
    | ap_contractE_c4(u,v,w)
    | ap_contractE_c3(u,v,w)
    | ap_contractE_c2(u,v,w)
    | ap_contractE_c1(u,v,w) ),
    file('COL091-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(18,axiom,
    ( ~ ap_contractE_c1(u,v,w)
    | equal(u,comb_app(combK,w)) ),
    file('COL091-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(23,axiom,
    ( ~ ap_contractE_c2(u,v,w)
    | equal(comb_app(comb_app(combS,ap_contractE_sk1p(u,v,w)),ap_contractE_sk1q(u,v,w)),u) ),
    file('COL091-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(24,axiom,
    ( ~ ap_contractE_c3(u,v,w)
    | member(pair(u,ap_contractE_sk2q(u,v,w)),contract) ),
    file('COL091-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(27,axiom,
    ( ~ ap_contractE_c4(u,v,w)
    | member(pair(v,ap_contractE_sk3q(u,v,w)),contract) ),
    file('COL091-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(29,axiom,
    ( ~ ap_contractE_c4(u,v,w)
    | equal(comb_app(u,ap_contractE_sk3q(u,v,w)),w) ),
    file('COL091-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(30,axiom,
    ~ member(pair(combK,u),contract),
    file('COL091-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(32,axiom,
    member(pair(comb_app(combK,p),r),contract),
    file('COL091-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(33,axiom,
    ( ~ member(pair(p,u),contract)
    | ~ equal(comb_app(combK,u),r) ),
    file('COL091-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(40,plain,
    ( ~ ap_contractE_c4(u,p,v)
    | ~ equal(comb_app(combK,ap_contractE_sk3q(u,p,v)),r) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[27,33]),
    [iquote('0:Res:27.1,33.0')] ).

cnf(42,plain,
    ~ ap_contractE_c3(combK,u,v),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[24,30]),
    [iquote('0:Res:24.1,30.0')] ).

cnf(156,plain,
    ( ~ ap_contractE_c2(u,v,w)
    | ~ equal(u,combK) ),
    inference(spl,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[23,2]),
    [iquote('0:SpL:23.1,2.0')] ).

cnf(168,plain,
    ( ~ ap_contractE_c4(combK,p,u)
    | ~ ap_contractE_c4(combK,p,u)
    | ~ equal(u,r) ),
    inference(spl,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[29,40]),
    [iquote('0:SpL:29.1,40.1')] ).

cnf(169,plain,
    ( ~ ap_contractE_c4(combK,p,u)
    | ~ equal(u,r) ),
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[168]),
    [iquote('0:Obv:168.0')] ).

cnf(205,plain,
    ( ap_contractE_c4(combK,p,r)
    | ap_contractE_c3(combK,p,r)
    | ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r)
    | ap_contractE_c1(combK,p,r) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[32,15]),
    [iquote('0:Res:32.0,15.0')] ).

cnf(209,plain,
    ( ap_contractE_c4(combK,p,r)
    | ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r)
    | ap_contractE_c1(combK,p,r) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[205,42]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:205.1,42.0')] ).

cnf(221,plain,
    ( ~ equal(r,r)
    | ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r)
    | ap_contractE_c1(combK,p,r) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[209,169]),
    [iquote('0:Res:209.0,169.0')] ).

cnf(224,plain,
    ( ap_contractE_c2(combK,p,r)
    | ap_contractE_c1(combK,p,r) ),
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[221]),
    [iquote('0:Obv:221.0')] ).

cnf(270,plain,
    ( ~ equal(combK,combK)
    | ap_contractE_c1(combK,p,r) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[224,156]),
    [iquote('0:Res:224.0,156.0')] ).

cnf(274,plain,
    ap_contractE_c1(combK,p,r),
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[270]),
    [iquote('0:Obv:270.0')] ).

cnf(283,plain,
    equal(comb_app(combK,r),combK),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[274,18]),
    [iquote('0:Res:274.0,18.0')] ).

cnf(286,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[283,2]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:283.0,2.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : COL091-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue May 31 06:39:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.18/0.46  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.46  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.46  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.18/0.46  SPASS derived 205 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 159 clauses.
% 0.18/0.46  SPASS allocated 63537 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.46  SPASS spent	0:00:00.11 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.46  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.18/0.46  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.46  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.46  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.46  		0:00:00.04 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  Here is a proof with depth 5, length 23 :
% 0.18/0.46  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.46  Formulae used in the proof : k_app ap_contractE1 ap_contractE4 ap_contractE9 ap_contractE10 ap_contractE13 ap_contractE15 k_contractE k1_contractD_h1 k1_contractD_c1
% 0.18/0.46  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------